Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elections System Switches Could Cost Taxpayers $40M (Cleveland)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:59 PM
Original message
Elections System Switches Could Cost Taxpayers $40M (Cleveland)
POSTED: 5:35 pm EST February 27, 2008
UPDATED: 6:25 pm EST February 27, 2008

CLEVELAND -- After years of miscues and mistakes, Cuyahoga County election officials are confident they will pull off a clean election this time.

But to fix the mistakes, taxpayers are going to pay tens of millions of dollars, reported chief investigator Duane Pohlman.

The mistakes were made years ago when Cuyahoga County rushed to buy electronic voting machines, and the county never got a warranty, reported Pohlman.

Taxpayers are now paying not only for the old electronic machines, but possibly two new systems.

Two years of fiascos and frustrations forced the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections and Ohio's secretary of state to scrap the Diebold TSX machines now sitting in boxes, which cost $22 million.

Diebold reports that the county hasn't requested a refund.

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/15429715/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Better that than a rigged election!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cheap at any price, how much did Bush cost us? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. The officials who did it should be charged with fiduciary failure and sued
to recover the costs. It's not as though it would have been hard to do their job correctly. They had the entire power of the state at their disposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've noticed that whenever a venue decides to change out these POS
there is a lot of negative PR -- warnings of expense and delay. That happened here, too, when Debra decertified some of the worst systems.

It never seems to work the other way around. You don't read stories warning you about these machines before they are installed. I bet that the vendors seed this stuff in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC