Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aussie Paper: "Iraq war 'caused (economic) slowdown in the US'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:44 AM
Original message
Aussie Paper: "Iraq war 'caused (economic) slowdown in the US'"





http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23286149-2703,00.html



Iraq war 'caused slowdown in the US'

Peter Wilson, Europe correspondent | February 28, 2008

THE Iraq war has cost the US 50-60 times more than the Bush administration predicted and was a central cause of the sub-prime banking crisis threatening the world economy, according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.

The former World Bank vice-president yesterday said the war had, so far, cost the US something like $US3trillion ($3.3 trillion) compared with the $US50-$US60-billion predicted in 2003.

Australia also faced a real bill much greater than the $2.2billion in military spending reported last week by Australian Defence Force chief Angus Houston, Professor Stiglitz said, pointing to higher oil prices and other indirect costs of the wars.

Professor Stiglitz told the Chatham House think tank in London that the Bush White House was currently estimating the cost of the war at about $US500 billion, but that figure massively understated things such as the medical and welfare costs of US military servicemen.

The war was now the second-most expensive in US history after World War II and the second-longest after Vietnam, he said. The spending on Iraq was a hidden cause of the current credit crunch because the US central bank responded to the massive financial drain of the war by flooding the American economy with cheap credit.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't get the connection between the war and the housing bubble.
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 10:51 AM by Mountainman
I always thought the housing bubble was caused by deregulation of the financial markets. Lenders did not follow rules that prevented, in the past, the huge risks taken this time.


If you can really prove to the American people there is a connection between the bad economy and the war then McCain's plan to stay in the war means the bad economy will last longer and he will have a harder sell. People would rather have a job and eat even though they feel less safe. What good is safety when you are starving and unemployed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm not sure about that connection either, but the trillion $ long-term drain of the war is real.
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 11:36 AM by El Pinko
Was deregulation and easy credit caused by a fed that wanted to obscure the economic toll of an outlandishly expensive war, or was it brought about by the usual suspects, corps and investment houses who bribe politicians to grease the way for them to come up with these wonderful "investment vehicles" like CDOs that they concocted over the last few years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The cheap credit existed in the 90's long before the war.
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 11:18 AM by Mountainman
Maybe the central bank extended the cheap credit during the war, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm going to go out on a limb here.
Maybe, just maybe, more real estate homes meant, more taxes to the government. They had a stake in this scam.

Remember that these homes were being financed by Hedge Funds. i.e., rich people were risking large amounts of money, which the government didn't have to spend, to spur the economy through construction and home sales. All of that means that the government would get money through taxes, without having to shell out a penny. Remember, this is a Republican administration. They don't want to raise taxes for any reason, so they looked the other way as their Hedge Fund cash cows kept reeling in the money, because it needed HUGE amounts of money to run the country and pay for the war.

What happened? Outsourcing and the rest of the bleeding free market crap which caused people to lose their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mother earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. When will there be an end to the madness George Bush has
wreaked upon us? This is what Bush is known for, running a company, only now it's a country, into the ground.

It's disgusting that the only thing that gets investigated or pursued is whether or not Clemens is guilty of something, when the real criminals are fleecing the country and it goes on with no consequences and nary a peep from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. kinda like the Cold War bankrupted the Soviets???
stupid, never ending war is not a boon to any economy other than that of the war profiteers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And more specifically, the occupation of Afghanistan...
...which we are now occupying, also at an extremely heavy cost, ironically...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. And, the value of the dollar collapsed for the smae reason. Gas cost more in dollars!
But, check the value of a barrel of oil on a chart of other currencies. It is simply not the same for other countries as for the US, because you need more dollars to buy the same number of imported items, no matter which imported commodity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Now this is a brilliant analysis!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC