Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush:"make sure that our civil liberties of our citizens aren't- you know, are treated with respect"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:02 AM
Original message
Bush:"make sure that our civil liberties of our citizens aren't- you know, are treated with respect"

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/02/20080228-2.html

<snip>

Q You can get the Congress to protect telecom companies from lawsuits, but then there's no recourse for Americans who feel that they've been caught up in this. I know it's not intended to spy on Americans, but in the collection process, information about everybody gets swept up and then it gets sorted. So if Americans don't have any recourse, are you just telling them, when it comes to their privacy, to suck it up?

THE PRESIDENT: I wouldn't put it that way, if I were you, in public. Well, you've been long been long enough to -- anyway, yes, I -- look, there's -- people who analyze the program fully understand that America's civil liberties are well protected. There is a constant check to make sure that our civil liberties of our citizens aren't -- you know, are treated with respect. And that's what I want, and that's what most -- all Americans want.

Now let me talk about the phone companies. You cannot expect phone companies to participate if they feel like they're going to be sued. I mean, it is -- these people are responsible for shareholders; they're private companies. The government said to those who have alleged to have helped us that it is in our national interests and it's legal. It's in our national interests because we want to know who's calling who from overseas into America. We need to know in order to protect the people.

It was legal. And now, all of a sudden, plaintiffs attorneys, class-action plaintiffs attorneys, you know -- I don't want to try to get inside their head; I suspect they see, you know, a financial gravy train -- are trying to sue these companies. First, it's unfair. It is patently unfair. And secondly, these lawsuits create doubts amongst those who will -- whose help we need.

I guess you could be relaxed about all this if you didn't think there was a true threat to the country. I know there's a threat to the country. And the American people expect our Congress to give the professionals the tools they need to listen to foreigners who may be calling into the United States with information that could cause us great harm. So, on the one hand, the civil liberties of our citizens are guaranteed by a lot of checks in the system, scrutinized by the United States Congress.

And secondly, I cannot emphasize to you how important it is that the Congress solve this problem. The Senate has solved the problem. And people say, would you ever compromise on the issue? The Senate bill is a compromise. And there's enough votes in the House of Representatives to pass the Senate bill. It's a bipartisan bill. And the House leaders need to put it on the floor, let the will of the House work. In my judgment, it happens to be the will of the people, to give the professionals the tools they need to protect the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. oh, just reading that makes me do this
:puke:


He really has a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. reading that has bruised my brain
I threw up will listening to him spout this shit yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. You can always tell what Bush thinks when he makes these "mis-speaks"
He has people making sure liberties are treated with disrespect.

Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Chucklenuts is inadvertently transparent, isn't he?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. There IS a threat to our country, and its name is BushCo
the neocons are by far a greater threat than ANY so-called 'terrorist' organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. the truest thing I've read in a while
Hell I could stand a terrorist attack or two if it would deliver us from the bushco cabal. I would say today that they are probably the most hated people on the face of this world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, the "protect the shareholders" press conference after which the markets dropped.
Ah, memories. Whatta guy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. that's what it is all about
"protecting shareholders" and protecting his crony friends.

What an a$$ he is? He is really spinning his wheels to cover his own a$$ on this whole FISA thing, and he keeps screaming FEAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. This one is a Freudian slip?
Maybe.

But how can our liberties be protected by removing them? This is what Chimpy doesn't answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. "It was legal".
This little 3 word sentence is the key to the whole kingdom. If it was legal, there would be no need for immunity. Period! All the rest of the meandering prose is so much drivel, and worst of all every one of the reporters there knew it. No guts to ask the real question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. the tools they need to protect the country
Warrants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. "I wouldn't put it that way, if I were you, in public"
Is this for real? That sounds like more of a threat than a 'misspeak'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. He muttered it, but he said it. IIRC, he muttered "in public".
It's happening right in front of us, and just going by the wayside. I'm glad you pointed it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. it does seem like a threat: "Well, you've been long been long enough to -- anyway"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. "... worry that you'll wind up in gitmo too." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Now THIS is the kind of post that should be a instant K & R.
Allow me :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. This should be on the Greatest.
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. "I wouldn't put it that way, if I were you, in public."
I love the way that the first words out of his mouth are always an insight into what he's really thinking. He so moronically transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't want my civil liberties respected, I want them honored. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC