Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why worry about FISA? For $110 you can spy on anyone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:27 PM
Original message
Why worry about FISA? For $110 you can spy on anyone
The most invasive $110 anyone will ever spend

This is huge. Beyond huge: Anyone can buy a list of your incoming and outgoing phone calls, cell or land-line, for $110 online.

The bombshell was reported in a Chicago Sun-Times story. Aravosis decided to try it out:

In a nutshell, the Chicago Sun-Times ran a story two days ago about a Web site that sells phone records, for cells and land-lines, for $110 a pop. The company boasts on its own Web site:

Give us the cell phone number and we will send you the calls made from the cell phone number.

So I went to their site, plopped down $110, and within a day I had a list of every single phone number that called my cell, or that I called from my cell, for the month of November. I even had the dates the calls were made, and for a premium I could find out how long the calls were.

Journalists, politicians, businessmen, abused spouses, law enforcement, and everyone frickin' else -- your business is now everyone else's business for the low, low price of $110.

Not only must this be plugged immediately, and this service shut down, but whoever is giving this company these phone records must pay. A lot.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/7/16229/48489
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy cow
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepulveda Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. old news
see my other post.
fwiw, smart criminals (there are a few) use throwaway cells.

otoh, yer average law abiding citizen keeps the same cell for years, and doesn't realize that every call is logged, and readily accessible to private businesses (far more so than law enforcement databases)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or as B*sh agreed during his last press conference..
Those with any expectations of privacy can just "suck it up".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just think- this is what the gov't has as basic service
How about transcripts, voiceprint identification, location when calling...

That's sick that you can get that for $110 though. No wonder I hate cell phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Land lines, too... It can also do land lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. yeah... but it's not as good as knowing
exactly what was said by both parties on those phone calls, not to mention email and internet phone.

Yes, it needs to be fixed. We need a whole new set of privacy laws... not simply stopping the invasion of privacy laws like the Orwellian named "Protect America Act".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Apparently a lot of PIs use this service....
...to try and catch a wandering hubby or wifey. News flash to the cuckolded hubby or wifey, fuck your spouse more and you won't have a need for a PI or this service. (Also, try not bringing work home and try to treat your spouse with the respect and dignity they deserve - that works too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. interesting take on cheating. apparently it's all the victim's fault.
personally, i tend to think that cheating is a sign of two things:
(1) a relationship that sucks and was probably doomed whether there was cheating or not and
(2) a morally defective cheater who can't fathom breaking up first and THEN having sex with someone else.

part (1) implies that the cockolded (love that word!) parner is often not blame-free. on the other hand, it takes two to make a relationship work but only one to ruin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You forgot the second part between the parenthesis....
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 04:58 PM by Aviation Pro
...as in treat your spouse with dignity and respect. This seems to work in my household.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. This was reported months ago and I only have one thing to say....
what was Carl Rove's and Dick Cheney's cell phone number again??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepulveda Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. yesterday's news
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 03:46 PM by sepulveda
not surprising to me at all

i've done a LOT of intelligence work, in law enforcement. i have long claimed, and few really understand this, that PRIVATE businesses have far far far far more intel on the average person than govt. has - especially non-criminal intel.

the old skool fear was of "big brother".

the REAL fear, already realized - is of little brother.

private industry has far less regulation on the intel they can keep, share, and collect than govt. ever has

whenever we wanted a lot of intel on somebody we use private resources NOT govt. intelligence databases. the former are often much more extensive, AND require no probable cause or even reasonable suspicion to access

the average citizen, with a bit of a clue, and some spare $$$ can find FAR FAR FAR more about you than the average cop can. it's not even close.

what surprises me is that people are JUST starting to understand this. it's been that way for ages.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Holy shit....
someone needs to get a list of incoming and outgoing calls of the 911 passengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't call terrorists so I'm not worried. /sarcasm/ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sue the companies that provide this and your phone company.
They got it from someone - your phone company and your mailbox are the only ones with access to that, and it means the company has been divulging private and personal information. Bonus if their agreements or privacy policy say they won't do that. I smell a class action in the works.


I wonder how much of that $110 goes to pay bribes or pay hackers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. THIS IS GREAT!
ok--who can pony up the money to get republican's cell phone calls.

i'll start with larry craig.

who's with me?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. numbers called are not the same as conversations to those numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. not only that...
I saw an advert for some device that amplifies sound (for the hearing impaired in one case) but the ad also showed people listening to other people's conversations!! your neighbor freaking spying on you!!!

it's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC