Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does the foreclosure problem seem to stop at state lines?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:23 AM
Original message
Why does the foreclosure problem seem to stop at state lines?
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 AM by spinbaby
Look at this map. Why do Ohio and Tennessee have a problem whereas Kentucky does not? Does Kentucky have stricter regulations for lenders?



http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/business/hancock/blog/2008/01/national_foreclosure_map_count.html

On edit: added question mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Places that went through the "boom"...
when houses were selling like hot cakes are the ones feeling the foreclosure pinch now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When did Ohio and Tennessee boom?
I must have missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I live here in TN...
We had a housing boom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Here in metro Detroit, MI there was also a boom
although prices didn't spike as sharply as other states mainly because of the very sluggish job growth, housing was one of the few sectors that continued to grow robustly, as did housing prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. No idea, but that's a really good question.
I know the difference between Colorado and Kansas is that homes are still affordable in KS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. My guess is lending laws vary greatly. Would be interesting to compare your map
with one showing amounts of money the home loan industry gave to state legislators. Bet one would notice a similarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Probably something to do with job loss?
I don't know the exact numbers on job loss in individual states, but that could have something to do with the foreclosure rates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. It may indicate the prevalance of mortgage brokers
things like pay day lenders, and certain type of the mortgage broker business fall under state control and regulation. How each individual state regulated these entities may explain how the fraud, high pressure lending practices and relaxed appraisal standards played a role in containing or expanding the problem.

The crisis is very muti-pronged. High prices drove or encouraged too many people to accept an adjustble rate loan over fixed on the hopes that they could refinance later, none of which ever anticipated the possible decline in home prices, neither the lender or borrower. Mortgage fraud has been prevalent in many cases. Many banks operate locally or within just one or a few states, so they may be concentrated in the certain states where prices have declined sharply, and with it defaults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anywho6 Donating Member (458 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. I was asking myself the same question
I'm originally from KY--lived there for 35 years before moving to CA. I had recently seen a similar article and noted that KY's foreclosure rates, when compared to some of the harder hit states, were pretty low. I still have a large family there (one of my sisters is an executive with the Home Builders' Association of Louisville), but I haven't had a chance to ask anyone their opinion on this.

I know they were experiencing an increase in new home construction, sales and property values during the peak like everyone else. I was wondering if the lower foreclosure rate could be due to more people just being inclined to live within their means (lots of frugal people there by way of their German heritage!). It's just a theory. Very interesting question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. not necessarily frugal, but if they avoided ARMs, options
and other exotic home loans, they were probably able to escape losing their house. The crisis is being driven more so by a double squeeze than anything else. The sharp jump in people's payments start the cycle, once the homeowner tries to re-finance and is declined, it triggers phase two, try to sell. Once the market is flooded with sellers, phase 3 is triggered declining house prices, as time goes by, the homeowner can not make the higher payments, they can not sell and sadly, sooner or later, the home falls into foreclosure. Another thing, this was all very, very predictable. More and more loans were being sold as adjustble rate or teaser rate, at the same time that interest rates were bing pushed up. It was obvious that sooner or later, many, many borrowers would be trapped with unaffordable payments with no evidence of comparable wage increases to absorb the spike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Probably more open space to develop.
You can only build houses if you have someplace to build.

Plus, different states and counties have 10-year tax abatements favoring new construction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC