who are experts in navigating the closure of banks from the crisis of the 80s and 90s.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/ultimate-sell-signal-part-ii/story.aspx?guid=%7BA2FE5E59%2D337F%2D4F6C%2DA974%2D470D6FD8B553%7DThe FDIC has about 233 employees, and is scrambling to bring in another hundred or so, and this can only be for one reason: to oversee the dismantling of banks. There is a lot of speculation about whether these will be big banks or small banks. I am worried at least one major bank will fail in 2008, because it doesn't take fifty bank examiners to supervise the closure of a small bank--such a transition can occur over a weekend.
In addition to this, I was listening to the FNN (Financial News Network) and Doug Fabian was warning investors to move, if not entirely than largely, to cash positions. He advised investors to make absolutely certain they had no bank-invested funds that are not insured. And he said that although he sees no crisis with money market funds at this moment, he expects them.
Fabian's show was good today. He also said "Any sector that has dropped more than 10% this past year has exposure to sub-prime..."
I offer this for what it's worth. Many of us have been expecting a very, very dismal and serious financial crisis in the U.S. for some time, but it now appears that it could be more serious than even the most flagrant of us doomsday sayers (myself included) were fearing.
ON EDIT:
Fabian's proposed safe harbors are ETFs (exchange traded funds). I agree with him on this, as well as his advice to avoid certificates of deposit and municipal funds.
But why does he advise against annuities, at least for people who are, say, 65 or older?