Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why should Spitzer step down? Sen. Craig didn't step down with the bathroom fiasco.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:30 PM
Original message
Why should Spitzer step down? Sen. Craig didn't step down with the bathroom fiasco.
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 02:31 PM by Selatius
Why should he???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. craig just had a wide stance.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. His 'wide stance' excuse always made me laugh.
Your average public bathroom stall is 36" wide.

The next time you go to the bathroom, take a yard stick or tape measure with you and place it in front of the toilet.

Now, drop trou and have a seat. Try to spread your legs wider than 36" in order to 'inadvertently' stick your foot under the neighboring stall.

The only way he could have done it is if he were pantsless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because he has a sense of personal dignity?
A sense of shame?

Don't use larry Craig as your moral exemplar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone, Democrat or Republican,
already knew that Dems are just as susceptible to corruption as anyone else. I think the difference lies in those ordinary people who pull the (D) lever every election day and their willingness to hold their own leaders accountable. I surely hope that holds true in this case. :o

Our best hope is to hold Spitzer accountable for what he's done. We'd be in loads of trouble if we let him get away with corruption just because of the (D) after his name. We should treat him the same way we'd treat any (R) for the same thing. As long as the evidence shows he actually did this. Since this is the first I've heard of it, I don't really know enough to say if it does or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Corrupt or horny?
I think he just utilized services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Both
I think any politician utilizing the services of a prostitute is corrupt.

Now the issue of whether prostitution should be illegal is a whole different debate, but as it stands right now it is illegal, and our leaders should follow the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Somehow, I have a hard time grasping our purient interest and control
of other people's sex lives = corruption.

That's just over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree.
I happen to think prostitution should be legal. But as it stands right now it is illegal, and it is not for us to decide which laws our leaders should abide by and which they should not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. The regulation of stuff like this never works.
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 02:45 PM by sfexpat2000
It didn't work with booze. It doesn't work with sex workers. It doesn't work with dope.

People always try to skirt those laws, it's not even a real question. It's more like unworkable laws that are a trap for people like him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Again, I agree.
But we should not allow our leaders to break the law, even if we don't agree with those laws. I think the better course would be to work for legalizing prostitution. It would only work against our interests to allow our leaders to break the law just because we think the law is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. It isn't corruption.
I don't care who he is having sex with or how much it costs. I do care that Spitzer made his career partly on the basis of prosecuting prostitution rings, which makes him an opportunistic hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That is a valid point, to my mind.
I still hate to see this happen. He was a great fighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermeerLives Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. Very well said!
The standard must be the same for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Thanks, and welcome to DU.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 06:24 AM by mutley_r_us
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. It appears as though he has broken State and Federal laws.
He should step down, post haste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think he should unless the consequences to him
will be too great.

He's a good man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. No element of prostitution in Craig's case
Plus even if you believe sex should be a lawful service freely exchanged between individuals, the amount of cash in this New York ring could amount to thousands of dollars of unreported income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Becasue we are more honest and have more integrity?
People who think Larry Craig should have been kicked out or resigned and don't think that Spitzer should do the same have a bit of a double standard going don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm saying is if Craig didn't step down, I don't see why Spitzer should.
I wasn't applying a different standard in that regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. He should step down because he got caught banging
a hooker instead of his wife and managed to get caught up in a federal investigation of a prostitution ring. At best that makes him an asshole, at worst a moron. I don't give a rats ass if the Republicans respect and encourage this kind of shit, IMHO we shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I guess I don't think that his private life is any of my business.
I seem to be in the minority.

But I'd feel the same way if he was caught with a roach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. If he were caught with a blunt, that'd be even worse.
It sort of shows you what needs decriminalizing in America, but of course, the whole moral values crowd comes in and shits on the parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. If he were just cheating on his wife
I would just think he was an asshole, but he, in his career, has gone after prostitution rings before, now he gets caught using one. He broke the law, the law he in the past has enforced. If he had been caught with a roach after prosecuting drug users would you feel differently? I know when Rush got busted we all called him out on his hypocrisy, why wouldn't we do the same for Spitzer. I can't give him a pass just because he has a "D" next to his name...



But I do understand the desire to do so.. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I'm not even a Democrat. I just liked him.
Damn. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. Given that he prosecuted and sent people to jail for the same thing he was caught doing...
Morality or "personal affairs" aside, the professional hypocrisy alone should lead him to step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. FREE sex is okay with Republicans...like outsourcing, kinda.
Uh...you know, if you can outsource to the airport mens room, why pay for it? It's all about the, er...bottom line. Spitzer broke the rules, and he PAID for sex which any self-disrespecting politician should be able to strong-arm or cajole his way into for free.

Larry Craig is a victim. His passion for free enterprise caught him with his pants down and stalled his career. But he'll soon be flush once again. Let the eagles soar! Spitzer...BWHAHAH! Fuckin' putz. He had to PAY for it! :rofl:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because we're in the middle of a presidential Primary season
And we're trying to keep the spotlight on taking over from a corrupt administration and its political Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe because hooker engagement is illegal?
:shrug: Me I could give a crap who screws who
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because He's Corrupt and Democrats Such as Myself
hate corrupt politicians.... they deserve to be in the GOP not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because we all know that Repubes are scumbags and are not surprised
when one kills an intern or tries to have sex with a minor. We expect that out of Repubes, not so much out of Dems. That is not to say they don't, just not as deranged as the GOP. Good question, why should he? They were just hookers, not like he started a war based on lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because he is a fucking hypocrite?
He prosecuted prostitution rings as a DA and bragged about how vile they were. Fuck him, he should quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. "fucking hypocrite" LOL that's the best pun of the day! ^5 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Vitter Would Be A Better Example
Truth be known, I'm a bit torn on how to react to this...it's still early and we don't have more details, and thus I want to withhold judgement until there's more information available.

That said...there should be a differentiation made here between an affair and soliciting sex from a professional. Affairs, especially those of the heart (which many become...Judy Nathan anyone?) can and do a lot of damage to the person, his/her family and their ability to perform their job. Folks in Detroit will agree to that considering Mayor Kilpatrick's current mess. Then there's what I call "stupid sex"...going for a quick thrill...this would include La Affaire Lewinski or Senator Craig...some may even call it "thrill sex"...it's not the money, but the chance that motivates...what one can get away with and living on the edge. Lastly there, "professional sex"...using a hooker...a loveless transaction...which the Vitter and now Spitzer cases fall within.

No moralizing here as I know others are already debating that side of this...and this is where I am torn, as the libido is a very personal and quirky thing. Now if we find out Spitzer was using government funds or time (or dog walkers) to conduct his private business...or did a favor for someone connected with this fiasco (and that covers blackmail) then it affects his ability to govern has been compromised. Now if this was prior to his taking office or it was "on his time", then one can feel sorry for the dude, but this is appears in our discourse, thanks to Vitter, to be a private matter between a politician, his/her spouse and some spiritual advistor (i think they're kept on retainer). The ultimate judge on this behavior should be the voters. If constituents are upset, they can try to bring pressure for a resignation or try to recall him.

A big caveat on this last part...and this is where we need more information. If Spitzer is indicted and convicted, he is guilty of a crime and should step down as, no matter how one agrees or disagrees with the law, it was broken, knowingly, and any elected official who is convicted of this type of crime (it's still a felony in most states) they should resign...especially a lawyer like Spitzer...he probably has prosecuted these type of caess...more the reason he should have known better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Republicans sure didn't want him to stay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Because he's a flaming HUGE hypocrite. And Craig should have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. He prosecuted other men for the EXACT SAME CRIMES. Just for THAT he should resign.
And maybe devote his life to legalizing prostitution instead of prosecuting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
37. Because the legislature will impeach/recall him. and if they do that he HAS to leave
(see Gray Davis (D-CA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. He should get out of the way if the substance of the charges is true.
I.e., that he broke state and federal laws. He should resign to move the circus off center stage. He would be replaced by David Paterson, a progressive Dem who led the minority in the NY State Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. He should immediately launch an investigation of the Republican scumbags who set him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. LOL!
but you need to remember to use the sarcasm smilie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Wake up. It's the Karl Rove era. All charges against Democrats are to be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. sorry, but the only person who "set up" spitzer was...spitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. BECAUSE!
Laws are for democrats!

"No DEMOCRAT, Is Above The Law!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
44. Because this destroys Spitzer's credibility. It would be better for the NY Dem party
for him to step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
46. He should step down because he set himself up for blackmail.
He used incredibly bad judgment in using an industry that is run by organized crime. He broke the law. He should be gone by today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC