So for a while now Randi Rhodes has implied that she's sitting on information

[dflprincess]

that would destroy any chance Clinton has of being elected. I'm no fan of Clinton (or Obama), but if Randi really does have info like this shouldn't she make it public or just shut up? I'm thinking Randi doesn't have a damn thing but is trying to make herself appear important by playing "I know something you don't know" with us.

[leftofcool]

1. They all like to do that

[The_Casual_Observer]

2. Randi & the rest proved to be no match for bush, so now they are off on to

Clinton.

[NightWatcher]

3. did you catch Friday's show?

I think her deal was keeping quiet (and neutral) while Hillary behaved the way she did in the past few weeks/months.

She said she cold not sit by and be expected to favor her in the general without calling her out on her garbage.

[JackBeck]

4. She's tearing Hillary apart right now.

Mentioned not only the Clinton Library donor scandal, but also how Hillary's brother was involved with a "pay-for-pardon" racket.

Randi saying she hasn't been vetted for the White House and is making an excellent case that, like Bush II, Hillary would seal Bill's Presidential records.