Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eliot Ness was asked what he would do if Prohibition were overturned.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:38 PM
Original message
Eliot Ness was asked what he would do if Prohibition were overturned.
He said he supposed he'd have a drink.

This exemplifies why I'm so bitterly disappointed in Spitzer. He built his career on being a squeaky-clean crusader against crime and corruption--just like the Eliot from the previous generation--and by default put himself up to a high standard.

People are asking why it should be so bad for two consenting adults to have sex--and that completely misses the point. Prostitution, for the time being, is illegal. Period. Maybe it's a stupid law, maybe it isn't--but regardless, it is the law. Spitzer should have respected the very laws he insisted others obey as well; not doing so destroys his credibility, his reputation, and any current and future attempts to continue to prosecute corporate corruption.

Ness, from everything we know, obeyed the laws he was hired to uphold, even though they were demonstrably stupid. He understood that it wasn't a matter of whether a man should be allowed to have a drink, it was a matter of honoring his oath to enforce those laws, and so he did. Too bad Spitzer wasn't able to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're assuming that Ness never had a drink during prohibition
I don't make that assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. By EVERY account, that man was as clean as they come. And no one has ever even suggested...
...that he had a drink while Prohibition still stood.

And that also doesn't change the point of my post one iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe, maybe not
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 06:58 PM by depakid
Did Spitzer disappoint? Surely. But it seems to me the corollary of that point is very few can meet the sort of perceptions that they set up -and when compared to "mythical figures. they'll almost always disappoint..

People are all flawed- and some have worse judgments than others.

My pet theory is that someone had dirt on Mario Cuomo -which is why he didn't seek the presidency. I have no reason to think that -just a hunch and a recognition of the way things tend to be in New York in certain circles....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "very few can meet the sort of perceptions that they set up"
I'm sorry, but how difficult is it to refrain from employing the services of a high-priced call girl? Give me a fucking break.

I have no doubt at ALL that there were many people out to get Spitzer, which is all the more reason he should have obeyed the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That was my theory on Cuomo too -- when politicos were debating his potential, I felt he was just so
drop-dead sexy that way too many old girlfriends would show up in front of microphones willing to tell their stories, if Cuomo ever tried to run for higher office. Yes, just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you talking about Eliot Ness...
or Kevin Costner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm talking about Ness, who did become an alcoholic AFTER Prohibition was overturned.
There was a reason his group that went after Capone was called "the untouchables," and it's because he sought out men like himself who obeyed the laws and were immune to bribery.

Ness died of a heart attack in his mid-50s, no doubt helped along by his eventual alcoholism (which by most accounts was pretty severe).

That, however, does not change the point of my post: if one expects to have any moral authority whatsoever in a position like Spitzer's (and Ness'), you have to obey the laws. If you don't, you lose moral authoriy, you lose your reputation, you lose your career. Ness kept his nose clean while he was in a position where that was vital; he understood it was vital, and Spitzer should have, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:14 PM
Original message
I'm just shocked that he was so stupid -- he should assume the Repubs are tapping his
phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm just shocked that he was so stupid -- he should assume the Repubs are tapping his
phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC