Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who on earth would spend $1.60 to $16 on a half dozen trysts with a gorgeous hooker??!?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:21 AM
Original message
Who on earth would spend $1.60 to $16 on a half dozen trysts with a gorgeous hooker??!?!
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:43 AM by HamdenRice
I'm just asking because I want to put the Spitzer family's wealth and Eliot's expensive *cough*, *cough* past-time in perspective.

Most DUers, most New Yorkers and most people of average means everywhere are scratching their heads at the revelation that Spitzer may have spent $80,000 on "sessions" with hookers.

Who on earth could rationalize spending $80,000 on prostitutes.

But we have to try to understand what $80,000 looks like to someone of Spitzer's wealth. The family is estimated to be worth around a half billion dollars.

So, to the average working Joe who has a net worth of $10,000, that $80,000 is the equivalent of $16. To the middle class Jane with a net worth of $100,000, what Spitzer dropped on hookers looks a lot more like $1.60 .

People of his class earn at least $50 million to $100 million per year doing nothing, just collecting income on investments.

An upper middle class family's income for a year is pocket change to these people.

That's the way it is in the age of Bush and billionaires. The super rich don't calculate things the way we normal folks do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Spitzer also can't calculate the political risk of stupid behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. No, I wouldn't. Not ever...for any price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point but for the love of GOD did he really think he would get away with this
or is this more telling of the lives that elected officials and people of that economic strata live?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He wasn't just paying for sex..
he was paying for discretion and silence. That's why I think he was probably set up. There are hundreds out there like him. They pay top-dollar not to get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. "degree of difficulty"
apparently the diamond rating system was for "degree of difficulty" :shrug::scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Well, if he crusaded to legalize it
instead of sanctimoniously PROSECUTING it, I would have sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. so a thousand dollar per hour hooker is really just a 2 dollar hooker
with a website?







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Pretty much..
they're all providing the same basic service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. At those prices, you can't afford NOT to!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. One can always replace money but its hard to replace a good looking
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:30 AM by 0007
girl.

What did Jeff Gannon get from those patrons in the White House, who thought he was so hot?

Mr. Gannon could tell us about the super rich. He was in the hair business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. I just can't get over how incredibly self righteous and utterly stupid he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadAndy Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because life's too short to bang ugly chicks?? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Of course spending is relative. Some people buy BMW's some buy clunkers. Some stay at 5 star hotels
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:45 AM by mondo joe
and some at motels.

These distinctions (obviously) apply to those who have the resources to do either of these things at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Personally, I NEVER compromise
on toilet paper. I always buy the best. That's about the level of my extravagant ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. I couldn't get it up knowing I was tossing out 80G's...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. Even with 500mil I'd have to be wondering why I couldn't get "this" for "free"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. The sex could be gotten for free - the secrecy and security couldn't be.
That's a big part of what the high price is about - secrecy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Hope he got his money back then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. The service didn't violate their end of the bargain. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's one way to look at it
I suppose. Another is $80,000 is 80 FREAKIN' thousand dollars!!! It is:

- 75% of the value of my house
- It is my next 5 cars
- Health insurance for 7-8 years
- Groceries for about 15 years
- My wife's medicine for 4.5 years
- My salary for 4 years
- 20,000 gallons of gasoline (at $4 a gallon), enough for 69 YEARS worth of driving!
- My car insurance for 33 years, with enough gasoline to cover that time
- About what I need put my business back on solid ground

In any event, it is a disgraceful amount of money to pay for something that even Rush Limbaugh can manage to get for free.

There is something fundamentally wrong with a man who has to pay for sex. Wrong and pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. $100,000 is middle class?
Damn, I always thought that was filthy rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. In net worth, it's not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Net worth, not cash
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 10:11 AM by HamdenRice
It's a very strange thing. If you look at, for example, estates of working class people, when you total up everything, they are worth more dead than alive.

Usually this is equity in the family home (which in recent months sadly has been wiped out for many).

But take your typical NYC sanitation man and his hospital worker wife who have been paying a mortgage for 10 years, and yes, they are typically worth about $100,000 -- home equity, pensions, savings, life insurance, car -- even after subtracting debts (eg mortgage balance).

That doesn't mean they don't struggle every month to pay the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC