Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A witch hunt?: "U.S. prosecutors examining Spitzer's campaign funds"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 04:35 AM
Original message
A witch hunt?: "U.S. prosecutors examining Spitzer's campaign funds"
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 04:36 AM by KeepItReal
"Federal prosecutors are investigating whether Governor Eliot Spitzer used campaign funds in connection with his meetings with prostitutes, including payments for hotels or ground transportation, three people with knowledge of the investigation said.

Prosecutors have asked the governor's lawyers about the travel arrangements for three trips, including his Feb. 13 rendezvous with a prostitute at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington. The United States attorney's office in New York has also asked about the governor's use of car services during trips to Washington.

The governor's lawyers have begun consulting with a campaign finance expert who has long worked for Spitzer's political organization to see whether campaign funds were spent on the trips, including some as recently as last month, a person briefed on the investigation said."

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/14/america/14spitzer.php


Comment:

I though Spitzer was *RICH*!?!

1) Why would/should he need to use any money other than his own to pay for the "services"?

2) And how is sending an ACH *out* of his own bank account to a place of business "accepting a bribe"? Wouldn't a bribe be suspicious money going *into* his checking account? His bank's role in this is fishy at best.

3) If the Feds (AKA Bush & Co's U.S. Attorney) had a real case, why are they looking for sh*t like "did he use campaign money on his tryst?"

This smells like hit job... Raise enough of a scandal to get the guy to quit, then no substantive crime is found/prosecuted.

(edited for spelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Spitzer falls under the "message sent" column.
If they can get dirt him, in this case cheating on his wife, they can get dirt on anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wonder what really came first...the wiretaps on him, or the bank ratting him out?
just a question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Here's the timeline....
Bank notices unusual transactions involving transfers to shell companies.

Bank reports this to IRS.

IRS reports this to FBI.

FBI investigates with approval from Attorney General of US. Only then does FBI wiretap.

FBI thinks they are handling routine corruption case. Stumbles across prostitution. Not just $5000, more like $80k over the last year. Numerous visits in NY and across state lines.

The bottom line is, Spitzer was a fucking moron and an embarressment to us all. Glad he's gone and I hope he does jail time too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why aren't we reading about Clients "One" through "Eight?"
Who are they? Republicans, one assumes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. One thing they're not - prominent Democrats
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Or perhaps they are prominent Democrats who will NOW adhere slavishly to whatever the Repub agenda
dictates.....Fear being the great motivator that it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. He made his career via ruthless prosecution.......
The second even one dollar left his hands to knowingly do something illegal, he was screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed. He did get himself into this mess.
What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Absolutely true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. My hunch...
One of the high-powered Wall Street types that Spitzer prosecuted was probably using the same service. A little pillow talk between the john and the prostitute, and suddenly he's got information that can take down his bete noir.

I don't know if it's true, but I wouldn't be surprised if that turns out to be the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Quite possible. Or somewhere between "possible" and "likely." Or "quite likely."
If it's true that Roger Stone knew about this ahead of time, we know it stinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enfield collector Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. live by the sword, die by the sword. Just because he had a D after
his name does not meen he's a nice person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. maybe not. but he was a person prosecuting financial crime.
sorely needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC