|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 04:35 AM Original message |
A witch hunt?: "U.S. prosecutors examining Spitzer's campaign funds" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think Spitzer falls under the "message sent" column. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 05:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Wonder what really came first...the wiretaps on him, or the bank ratting him out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Here's the timeline.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why aren't we reading about Clients "One" through "Eight?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 06:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. One thing they're not - prominent Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Or perhaps they are prominent Democrats who will NOW adhere slavishly to whatever the Repub agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
4. He made his career via ruthless prosecution....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 06:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Agreed. He did get himself into this mess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oleladylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 06:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Absolutely true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. My hunch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Quite possible. Or somewhere between "possible" and "likely." Or "quite likely." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enfield collector (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 08:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. live by the sword, die by the sword. Just because he had a D after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. maybe not. but he was a person prosecuting financial crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC