Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. drug companies defrauded Medicare with price fixing scheme, rules judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:23 AM
Original message
U.S. drug companies defrauded Medicare with price fixing scheme, rules judge
U.S. drug companies defrauded Medicare with price fixing scheme, rules judge
Thursday, March 13, 2008 by: David Gutierrez


(NaturalNews) A federal judge has ruled that three pharmaceutical companies artificially marked up their prices in order to defraud Medicare and encourage doctors to prescribe their drugs over those of competitors.

The decision came in a class-action lawsuit against AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson and Warwick Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Schering-Plough Corp. U.S. District Judge Patti Saris ruled against AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb and Warwick, while clearing Johnson & Johnson of "egregious misconduct."

However, she described even Johnson & Johnson's actions as "troubling."

Saris agreed with the plaintiffs' complaint that the drug companies deliberately inflated their average wholesale prices in 2003, when those prices were still used to determine Medicare reimbursements. This created a gap between the prices that Medicare was paying and the (lower) prices charged to doctors and pharmacies. This meant that doctors would actually be reimbursed more than they had paid for the drugs, creating a profit incentive for doctors to prescribe certain products.

The judge ruled that AstraZeneca had overcharged for its prostate cancer drug Zoladex and ordered the company to pay nearly $4.5 million to one of the two groups of plaintiffs. Likewise, she found that Bristol-Meyers Squibb had overcharged for the cancer drugs Blenoxane, Cytoxan, Rubex, Taxol and Vepesid, and ordered the company to pay $183,454. She said that she needed more information to set damages amounts for the other group of plaintiffs.

more...

http://www.naturalnews.com/022835.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it's about time someone found against Big Pharma
"Sicko" brought the point home for me on meds. WHY is it that an Albuterol puffer is 25 CENTS in Cuba, but here in the states it's twenty five DOLLARS - and THAT's the co-pay price? :grr: :wow: :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez. Profiteering on cancer treatment drugs. You can't get any lower than that.
I want these crooks to go to jail. What they do is far worse than the guy serving time for robbing the local convenience store. The problem with slapping a fine on the company is that the individuals who made the decision to fix prices do not really suffer the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. True. You know who is gonna suffer for this, most likely?
The people in the labs..the biologists and chemists. We (and yes, I am one) are usually the first to feel the axe when one of these big companies do things like this (I know a lot of people who were laid off from Merck after the Vioxx debacle).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not surprised. That's what I saw in the banking industry as well in the 1980's
when the greed and excesses of the guys in the corporate office caused huge losses. I had to lay more than 13% of my staff off, and my staff worked in one of the few areas of that bank that was profitable. My experiences of over a decade in banking are a big factor in why I am a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC