Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are the odds that Spitzer was blackmailed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 09:56 AM
Original message
What are the odds that Spitzer was blackmailed?
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:19 AM by hedgehog
Did he loudly prosecute other prostitution rings out of some weird mixture of hypocrisy and risk taking, or could it have been a pay-off to the ring he patronized?


Edit: on reading some of the replies, I should make clear that I believe that Spitzer destroyed himself. By all accounts, various people and groups were just waiting for the chance to take him down and started checking him out as soon as the odd transactions turned up at his bank. Apparently, prosecutors were looking into what they thought was a bribery scandal and instead hit pay dirt with a sex scandal. Still, Spitzer willingly and frequently and flagrantly broke the law all by himself with no help from anyone.

To clarify, I did hear someone note that once Spitzer became involved with organized crime, he was subject to blackmail. The speculation is that he took a break from prosecuting corporate crimes to go after prostitution rings at the behest of the people he was involved with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. What are the odds that he broke a laundry list of laws? 100%
End of story.

You can't be blackmailed if you're keeping your nose clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Correct. Another reason JFK should not have been elected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. If he wasn't I'd be really disappointed in the mafia/high fananciers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Blackmailed? I don't see that
Do you mean "set up"? Or maybe "retaliated against"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me just say this
I have been asking about the blackmail card for some time now for all the dems caving in and it does not, I repeat, it does not gain any traction here at the DU. Why I have no idea but it hasn't and my bet is this, your, post won't either. go figure

Personally I feel that Blackmail is the only thing that explains why what is allowed to happen is allowed to happen. Our Dems are being blackmailed, especially Pelosi and Reid

I too would like to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Can you describe a scenario that fits any of these definitions of blackmail?
black·mail
–noun
1. any payment extorted by intimidation, as by threats of injurious revelations or accusations.
2. the extortion of such payment: He confessed rather than suffer the dishonor of blackmail.
3. a tribute formerly exacted in the north of England and in Scotland by freebooting chiefs for protection from pillage.
–verb (used with object)
4. to extort money from (a person) by the use of threats.
5. to force or coerce into a particular action, statement, etc.: The strikers claimed they were blackmailed into signing the new contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. wouldn't you think that all that info is maybe kept from me or you
usually blackmail is for the most part carried out in the dark not the light of day. Tell me what do you think is the reason for the dems giving in too bushco, why the impeachment was taken off the table, etc. I'm not interested so much in Spitzer but am in the mess we are in that only blackmail explains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Reported today that his bank (whom he prosecuted) was watching
funny transactions in his bank account. The whole thing sounds weird to me.

US is Examining Spitzer's Funds: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/nyregion/14spitzer.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frosty1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Very interesting article
http://www.gregpalast.com/

While New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was paying an ‘escort’ $4,300 in a hotel room in Washington, just down the road, George Bush’s new Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Ben Bernanke, was secretly handing over $200 billion in a tryst with mortgage bank industry speculators.

Both acts were wanton, wicked and lewd. But there’s a BIG difference. The Governor was using his own checkbook. Bush’s man Bernanke was using ours.

This week, Bernanke’s Fed, for the first time in its history, loaned a selected coterie of banks one-fifth of a trillion dollars to guarantee these banks’ mortgage-backed junk bonds. The deluge of public loot was an eye-popping windfall to the very banking predators who have brought two million families to the brink of foreclosure.

Up until Wednesday, there was one single, lonely politician who stood in the way of this creepy little assignation at the bankers’ bordello: Eliot Spitzer.

Who are they kidding? Spitzer’s lynching and the bankers’ enriching are intimately tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC