Source:
Sydney Morning HeraldChoosing Philip Zelikow to head the inquiry into America's response to the September 11 terrorist attacks was akin to putting the fox in charge of the hen house, writes Philip Shenon.
Richard Clarke could not believe what he was reading as he sat in his White House office. It was one of his last days on the job after almost a dozen years at the National Security Council, and this news was no retirement gift. On the afternoon of January 27, 2003, the Associated Press issued a short news report about Philip Philip Zelikow's appointment as executive director of the 9/11 commission.
"The fix is in," said Clarke. He knew and disliked Zelikow. Christ, how could anybody be so stupid? he wondered. Condi's friend?
Clarke understood that with Zelikow - Zelikow, of all people! - in charge, there was no hope that the commission would carry out an impartial investigation of the Bush Administration's bungling of terrorist threats in the months before September 11. Could anyone have a more obvious conflict of interest than Zelikow?
...
Most of the commissioners and the staff did not know until much later, but Zelikow had an important role at the White House in developing the scholarly underpinnings for the Iraq war. His 31-page "pre-emptive war" doctrine, written anonymously and at Rice's request, was released by the White House in September 2002 under George Bush's signature.
When commission staffers learned that Zelikow was the principal author, many were astounded. It was arguably his most serious conflict of interest in running the investigation. It was in his interest, they could see, to use the commission to try to bolster the Administration's arguments for war that he had helped make possible.
Read more:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/condis-inside-man/2008/03/14/1205472088777.html