Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Twelve House Dem's Vote No On FISA As Amended

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:21 PM
Original message
Twelve House Dem's Vote No On FISA As Amended
to exclude Telecom Immunity, perhaps they need to hear from their constituents:
  1. Boren
  2. Capuano
  3. Carney
  4. Cooper
  5. Filner
  6. Hinchey
  7. Holden
  8. Kuchinich
  9. Lampson
  10. Schuler
  11. Welch
  12. McDermott
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll145.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. why did Kucinich vote NO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because he's so liberal that sometimes he votes with the conservatives
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 02:39 PM by bluestateguy
No, seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I would guess that he would vote against any FISA expansion
And I think that's a good thing. After the last bill that expanded the FISA provisions expired in February, we reverted to the way things were formerly done - you know, before 9/11 when we still had our civil rights.

He didn't vote against telecom immunity. His vote had nothing to do with telecom immunity. He voted against another expansion of FISA provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kucinich? Why??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. DK voted no? wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did Dennis have a Brain Fart or What?
I want him to answer this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kuhcinich ?? Welch ??
What the &^%$$#& ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't understand the Kucinich and McDermott votes at all
They are about as Liberal as they get..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just don't get Denny.
I imagine that someone smarter than myself will come along and explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kucinich must have a Republic against him in November
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 02:51 PM by Gman
that'll make you do seemingly strange things. DK no doubt got a "pass" on this one as his vote wasn't necessary for the vote to prevail. Had he voted Yes, he would have had commercials run everywhere about how he enables terrorists.

I hope people look and see what a good Congressman sometimes has to do in order to stay being a good Congressman. This vote in no way diminishes DK. It only means he needs to get reelected. That's a good smart vote by DK.

No doubt it's the same with Lampson who's running for reelection to Tom Delay's old seat. The enemy there doesn't need any more ammunition.

---on edit---

You know what.. it could also be, and probably is that DK was voting against reauthorizing FISA, period. I'll bet that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hinchey (NY) is also very liberal - so maybe there's more to this
Maybe there's something else in the bill they opposed? Some procedural strategy?? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. McDermott and Kucinich...weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe it was in protest to even bringing a FISA bill up at all.
The FISA law that is already in place is all you need. To change the law in any way, shape or form would be stupid. They should have just not done anything on FISA. Waste of taxpayers money going through all of this shit. Godless Warmongering Bastard is just going to veto anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. There had to be something in the bill that irked Kucinich.
:shrug:

He wasn't going along with it anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC