Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now We Are Led By A "Coward Boy-King" Who Never Served In War-Larisa Alexandrovna

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:31 AM
Original message
Now We Are Led By A "Coward Boy-King" Who Never Served In War-Larisa Alexandrovna
American dead worth the cost of war? By what math?
Posted March 19, 2008 | 10:36 AM (EST)
Larisa Alexandrovna

It used to be - until this recent age - that a leader of a nation would ride out to war with his men as both a symbol of that which his military was fighting for and also as a show of his own commitment to the cause for which he was sending others to die. Even Queen Elizabeth I rode out with her small army as the Spanish Armada approached, instead of capitulating to her advisers that she should retreat to safety.

In the recent age the closest we have come to the bravery of a leader willing to die along side his men has been through the military service of our leaders before they put on the mantle of power. Although not as honorable as going to war alongside your men and women, it was still a lesson in the selflessness of those who serve their country and the true ugly of war. A lesson for a man much needed for when - as leader - he has the power to send many to their deaths on his say-so.

Now we are led by cowards who have never served in war and who only visit the front lines by cover of night, safely insulated from threats by the highest security and guarded by all sorts of humans and machinery so that no scratch can befall them. The leaders we have now do not now stand with their men and women at the horror of it all. Worse still, the men who have now become our leaders have never risked themselves or defended to the death any notion of democracy that they now so eagerly order others to die for.

It is bad enough that these charlatans are willing to declare war as easily as they declare what the entree will be for their three course dinner. It is bad enough that these dilettantes will hold up a moral cause that must be won as easily as they would use that very cause for a punchline during a political fund-raiser. It is bad enough that these sciolists will lecture those who are their superiors in such things as war while never ever having themselves seen the barrel of a gun. All of this and much more is bad enough, disgraceful enough, unpardonable enough, contemptible enough. But there is a whole new category of despicable that has yet to be defined when a pretender to honor, a coward boy-king will stand in his air-conditioned palace far away from the front-lines and opine that the lives lost for his war of choice were worth it.

Ladies and gentleman, I give you the disgrace known as the leader of the free world...

more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larisa-alexandrovna/american-dead-worth-the-c_b_92306.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course AWOL thinks the sacrifice is worth it.
He knows nothing about the subject of sacrifice.

http://awolbush.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Most Craven Warmongering Losers are Usually Pampered Brats
who have deluded themselves due to being protected from ever sacrificing anything themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, where was Elizabeth II, or Victoria, or...
Margaret Thatcher when wars were going on?

Or FDR, or Woodrow Wilson, or Bill Clinton?

Shrub is a lowlife coward who pulled strings to get into the Air Guard-- we know that, but it's beating a dead horse when we no longer have kings leading their knights and peasants into battle.

(Beat that horse too much and McCain becomes the only eligible candidate.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Uh oh, makes McCain sound "good" in contrast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. The original writer just realized this?
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 11:16 AM by sakabatou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Apparently the only way to overcome catapulted propaganda...
is to counter it in exactly the same manner: Tell the truth over and over and over in the hope that some of it will sink in.

Unfortunately, most Americans seem to possess the ability to understand, absorb and assimilate catch-phrases and sound-bytes far better than actual multi-syllable words strung together into something as well written as quoted in the OP. Were we a nation of readers instead of a nation with terminal ADHD and a three year old's demand for instant gratification, * and Dickie wouldn't have gotten their war. Hell, they wouldn't have been allowed to compete in the Republican primary in 1999.

As any ferner could tell you, Americans aren't the sharpest fork in the refrigerator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
synapsesfiring Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chicken Hawks Aplenty
Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Wolfowitz, Pearle -- all never served in the military. Don't even think about bringing up Bush's national guard service.

Those who beat the drum for war the loudest are the most coward of them all. We now know that all the reasons given for war were proven to be untrue. Every single foundation on which this criminal Administration built the rationale for war was fabricated and parsed in such a way there is now -- 5 years later -- no doubt they intentionally misled our country and should be IMPEACHED!

If Bush really respected the military, it wouldn't treat veterans like second-class citizens by not caring for their medical, educational, social and political needs. Instead, our Adminstration and those right-wing chicken hawks (Rush & Hannity) never had to serve and don't understand what its like to low crawl through sand and mud with bullets flying over your head.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Fatuous Flyboy from New Haven
How Bush Got (and Lost) His Wings
Tracking the National Guard Career of the Fatuous Flyboy from New Haven


By JEFFREY ST. CLAIR

SNIP

In April of 1972, two important events coincide. The Air Force mandates drug testing for all pilots during medical exams and Bush takes what will turn out to be his last flight as a pilot for the Air National Guard.

Less than a month later, Bush flees his Texas Guard base for Alabama, where he signs up to work on the congressional campaign of Winton "Red" Blount, a friend of Bush's father and Nixon's postmaster general. He didn't inform his superiors at Ellington that he had left Texas until two weeks later, when he requested a transfer to the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron, a postal unit with no fighter jets. Initially, the transfer is granted.

No one recalls seeing Bush report for duty and there is no documentary record supporting his service there, which, in any event, was to consist primarily of reading flight manuals--an uninviting assignment for the quasi-literate airman. On July 6, Bush is scheduled to take his required flight physical, which will for the first time include a drug test. He fails to show up. Failure to take a flight physical is grounds for immediate suspension of his pilot's license.

These days Bush claims that he simply blew off the physical because the Guard was phasing out the F-102 and he didn't expect to be piloting any more flights. This excuse is circumspect for two reasons. First, although the F-102 was on its way out, the jet had not yet been mothballed and Bush still had the opportunity to learn to fly the new generation of fighter jets. Indeed, there was a fleet of them just down the highway at Dannelly Air Base in Alabama. Moreover, the flight physical was a mandatory requirement of service. This was not a matter of getting a permission slip to play intramural polo at Yale. For most Guardsmen, failure to abide by such orders resulted severe consequences, like being compelled to spend two-years in active duty, perhaps in Vietnam.

SNIP

Just as he stiffed the Flight Evaluation Board in 1972, Bush now refuses to offer an explanation for his illegal and unjust war that has killed and maimed tens of thousands. "I'm the commander--see, I don't need to explain," Bush brayed in his best Mafia capo syntax to Bob Woodward. "I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel I owe anybody an explanation." That's the distilled essence of George W. Bush from his very own mouth: a bellicose and imperious buffoon who has never once been held to account for the mayhem he leaves in his wake.

http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair08122004.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Preznit AWOL, be it Alabama or Crawford.
Great piece Larisa!! :yourock: :loveya:

Thank you for posting this kpete :hug: :loveya:

Two of DU's brightest lights in the same OP.

Life is good :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC