Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anonymous Republican Senator Places Hold On Top Justice Department Nominees»

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:53 AM
Original message
Anonymous Republican Senator Places Hold On Top Justice Department Nominees»
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/22/leahy-hold-nominee/

Anonymous Republican Senator Places Hold On Top Justice Department Nominees»


The Bush administration has repeatedly attacked the Democratic Congress for stalling on the President’s executive nominees. In January, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said it was unfortunate the Democratic leadership “has not moved forward on its obligation to have hearings and to hold votes.” Last month, Bush said the Senate is treating his nominees as “political pawns.”

Yet as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) revealed in a letter to Bush on Thursday, an anonymous Republican is now actually holding up two of the President’s top Justice Department nominees. From Leahy’s letter:

I regret to inform you that we were stalled last week in our efforts to fill two other critical positions at the Department, when an anonymous Republican hold blocked confirmation of Kevin O’Connor to be the Associate Attorney General, and Gregory Katsas to be the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Division. I was particularly disappointed with this unexpected development. … They were set for confirmation before the Easter recess, until the last-minute Republican objection stalled them.

The longest-stalled nominee is Michael Sullivan, Bush’s choice to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). He, in fact, is being blocked by conservative “gun-rights champions” — including Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) — who believe the ATF has been overzealous in enforcing requirements that dealers keep detailed gun-sale records.”

So far, however, the White House has refused to criticize these conservatives blocking the President’s nominees, instead continuing to attack Democrats. But in reality, Bush has had 90 percent of his nominations confirmed to lifetime appointments — far better than President Clinton fared.

In addition to congressional conservatives, Bush is also responsible for the hold-up on many of his nominees. In December, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) met with the White House and agreed to allow more than 84 of the President’s nominees to go through. Bush, however, insisted that unless the Senate agreed to torture advocate Steven Bradbury’s recess appointment, “he wouldn’t make a deal.” “It’s Brabury, or nobody,” said Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well of couse.. Bushie wants a Pro-Torture guy...
Otherwise someone may just decide to arrest his damn ass. Which, by the way, needs to happen. They are criminals. If it were me or any other American, their asses would be in an electric chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. This asshat needs to be outed....
:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Plus There's No FEC...
Gramps is breaking campaign laws he "fought" to enact...and will spend like a drunken flyboy cause the booosh regime has held up the confirmation of new board members so it can plant its own toadie to poison this system. It's a common tactic now this regime uses to hide its pillaging...with many departments now operating under "acting directors"...political hacks who never faced a confirmation and as long as nominations for replacement heads are gridlocks, it serves this regime just fine.

Many forget the games the GOOP played with Clinton's judicial nominations. Hatch put holds on almost all of them and this hypocrite was all in favor of using the "nuclear option" to ramrod GOOP nominations through. He didn't need to bother, Democrats rolled over. This is an important reason we need to help elect a Fillibuster proof Senate...61 seats (or 10 more than we currently have) that will prevent this shit from happening to the a Democratic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gramps is officially over the limit:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. AND WTF is up with anonymous.. Let's hear it.. Who is this Republican
blocking the confirmations? Why are the Dems allowing the R's to be anonymous? If this was the other way around, the R's would let it slip who's who.... I'm so tired of our "secret" govt. For The People, By The People is dead as a doornail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. It never ceases to amaze me
that a President with only 9 months left in office and a 20 something percent approval rating has any standing to making DEMANDS. One thing for sure, and I would bank on it, when the next Democratic President gets elected the Senate RePukes will block, obstruct and divert anything and everything at will regardless of their minority status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. "unless the Senate agreed to torture...Steven Bradbury"
That's how I read it at first. :) WTF? Now L'il Boots is demanding other people start torturing, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. why anonymous??? out him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC