Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were Karl Rove’s Emails Destroyed? - BY Scott Horton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:53 PM
Original message
Were Karl Rove’s Emails Destroyed? - BY Scott Horton
Were Karl Rove’s Emails Destroyed?
DEPARTMENT No Comment
BY Scott Horton
PUBLISHED March 22, 2008

Another round in the saga of the vanished . . . reappeared . . . no–vanished White House emails. As last noted, U.S. magistrate John Facciola has now twice given the White House short deadlines to produce the missing emails or explain why they could not be produced.

On Friday afternoon, the White House stated that it had destroyed old email hard-disk drives, and that the traffic on them couldn’t be recovered. It provided evasive responses on a number of other queries, including whether emails were lost or could be retrieved. This marks a continuation of White House evasions that now stretch over almost a year. Here is Pete Yost’s account for the Associated Press:

Older White House computer hard drives have been destroyed, the White House disclosed to a federal court Friday in a controversy over millions of possibly missing e-mails from 2003 to 2005. The White House revealed new information about how it handles its computers in an effort to persuade a federal magistrate it would be fruitless to undertake an e-mail recovery plan that the court proposed.

“When workstations are at the end of their lifecycle and retired … the hard drives are generally sent offsite to another government entity for physical destruction,” the White House said in a sworn declaration filed with U.S. Magistrate Judge John Facciola. It has been the goal of a White House Office of Administration “refresh program” to replace one-third of its workstations every year in the Executive Office of the President, according to the declaration.

Some, but not necessarily all, of the data on old hard drives is moved to new computer hard drives, the declaration added. In proposing an e-mail recovery plan Tuesday, Facciola expressed concern that a large volume of electronic messages may be missing from White House computer servers, as two private groups that are suing the White House allege.

Facciola proposed the drastic approach of going to individual workstations of White House computer users after the White House disclosed in January that it recycled its computer backup tapes before October 2003. Recycling — taping over existing data — raises the possibility that any missing e-mails may not be recoverable. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080321/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_e_mail;_ylt=Asb5LHAk89gUyAJDNa6gdCeyFz4D


What’s at the bottom of this controversy? Karl Rove and his email traffic from the beginning of the Bush presidency, much of which seems mysteriously to have disappeared. The Rove traffic had been subpoenaed by Patrick Fitzgerald, and when Congress sought the materials in connection with their investigation of the U.S. attorneys scandal, they began to receive a series of inconsistent explanations as to why the emails could not be produced.

....................

more at:
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/03/hbc-90002713
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am literally startled anew, each time I'm flipping channels and fly past Karl Rove, smiling at the
camera on Fox. This mean should be in PRISON, not a highly-paid talking head on TV.
He's a criminal of the worst sort.

Makes my blood boil every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rove's drive would've contained the evidence of the many ways they set up the STEAL of 2004 election
and THAT is something BushInc could not stand for the public and the history books to know after being put in office by the Supreme Court in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rove's home computer(s) should be seized by the FBI
to see if he cc'd or bcc'd his work emails to his home. I wouldn't put it past that POS to have them archived somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm no techie, but I've seen others post something about servers
and not just the hard drives having record on them, maybe?? I could be insane, too...
But clearly, this administration has much to hide, and much for which they should be paying criminal penalties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. REC 5. Here's a DU compilation thread, one year ago when this news broke.
Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
Mar-28-07 - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Those Rove subordinates couldn't leave fast enough in 2006 and 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. There's that picture of Rove and Susan Ralston using nice, new laptops. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does Larry Craig have a wide stance?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. a new excuse?
how many is that now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. And they're counting on McCain to keep the lid on all of it
The way he kept the lid on the Abramoff emails.

It's no coincidence that McCain emerged on top of the GOP primaries. He's the only one they can absolutely count on to keep the coverup going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC