XOKCowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:21 PM
Original message |
At least 51 more killed in Iraq today after Cheney and McCain visit... |
|
The good news is that they were all Iraqi. That don't count right? The "surge" is still working right? :sarcasm: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/world/middleeast/24iraq.html?_r=2&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
Nitrogenica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The term "The Surge" is wearing thin. It's the most dumbed down |
|
name for a strategy I've ever heard.
Its exactly the same as "Send More Troops", and this is rolled out as some sort of brilliant strategy McCain can take credit for?
Even worse, if it doesn't work, we're off to Iran aren't we?
|
Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I like how they don't call it an "escalation" |
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Americans turned against this war because of American casualties. Nothing more. |
|
I'm convinced that Americans would have continued to support this war if American casualties had been minimal, and 2 million Iraqis were killed.
|
XOKCowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Sad to say I agree with you.. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |