Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We live in a bizarre country: Fox refuses to pay indecency fine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:10 AM
Original message
We live in a bizarre country: Fox refuses to pay indecency fine
Murdoch the GOP Kingmaker's slimy entertainment network is refusing to pay a fine the kommandants of its demographic installed to placate the puritans among the rank and file. Would anyone but Murdoch have the chutzpah to say fuck you to the Inquisitors at the FCC over a First Amendment issue? Of course money, not principle, is the likely motive, despite the network's claim that stripper-licking was "integral to the storyline." And the sick thing is, in this staring contest, does anyone doubt that the FCC will blink before Fox does? Will this make the ludicrous new standards go away? I think it will all go away after the next election--unless Bush III is selected.

Is this a bizarre country, or what?


http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117982855.html?categoryid=14&cs=1


Fox refuses to pay indecency fine
FCC objects to sexual nature of 'America'

By WILLIAM TRIPLETT

Fox Television is refusing to pay a $91,000 broadcast indecency fine that the Federal Communications Commission slapped on the network for a 2003 episode of its "Married by America" reality show.

...

In 2004, the FCC initially fined 169 Fox stations $7,000 each -- a total of $1.2 million -- for the episode, which included images of contestants licking whipped cream off strippers. Recently, however, the agency reduced the number of stations to 13 and thus the fine to $91,000, saying it would fine stations only in markets from which it had received complaints.

Fox has argued that the material was not statutorily indecent but rather was integral to the storyline.

"We reject Fox's claim," FCC analysts wrote after reviewing videotape. "Even with Fox's editing, the episode includes scenes in which partygoers lick whipped cream from strippers' bodies in a sexually suggestive manner. Another scene features a man on all fours in his underwear as two female strippers playfully spank him. Although the episode electronically obscures any nudity, the sexual nature of the scenes is inescapable, as the strippers attempt to lure partygoers into sexually compromising situations."

...

"Fox believes that the FCC's decision in this case was arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with precedent and patently unconstitutional," the company's statement said.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I try to always keep at least 2 or 3 can of Redi-Whip in the fridge
I never know when the strippers will show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm so conflicted... head... exploding!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obviously those prudes at the FCC don't know how delicious strippers are.
Especially when covered in whipped cream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC