Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHAT A PRICK: Mukasey was going to fight Siegelman's release!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:02 PM
Original message
WHAT A PRICK: Mukasey was going to fight Siegelman's release!!
Ex-Ala. Governor to Be Freed on Bond

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A federal appeals court approved the release of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman on bond Thursday while he appeals his convictions in a corruption case.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the former governor had raised "substantial questions of fact and law" in challenging his conviction.

....

Before the 11th Circuit's decision, the House committee had asked the Justice Department to temporarily release Siegelman to allow him to testify in person. But Attorney General Michael Mukasey indicated that he would not support the request.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5is_hQ_YDe8B6WJYlYMASndVKjNPQD8VM0RU02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. mukasey is the extention of bu$h*/cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But yet the Senate Democrats told us this was the best we could get..
makes you wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, failing assassination, Siegelman will testify...
How do you like those apples, Mukasey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. don't put it past them.
once the lid is pried off this bucket of shit, many people will be in serious trouble, starting with the US Attorney, several witnesses and even the District Court Judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. This is my fear-especially while he is still in prison.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. And the Senate Democrats were absolutely right!
There is no WAY Bush would have picked anyone even halfway acceptable, but at least Mukasey wasn't a totally-unqualified Bush crony (he had actually sat on the bench before he became AG) like...oh, say Harriet Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Ted Olson's anti-Clinton past = can't hide his connection to the notorious "Arkansas Project."
He was Bush's first choice! Why not Scaife, I had to ask!

Olson also hired USA Yang off the investigation of his client, Rep. Jerry Lewis, for a cool 1.5 million a year. No corruption here. MOVE ON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. He also picked up a couple of others from that office.
It's in my journal.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. RM Scaife?? HaHa. Wasn't he going through a nasty divorce last
year. Something about hookers, etc.

:rofl:

More of the values crowd!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. doesn't make you wonder toooo much....i hate to admit that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. As usual
Schumer and Fienstein sell us out for expediency. If they don't know by now that NO ONE BUSH NOMINATES FOR ANYTHING WILL BE WORTH A DAMN, then they never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. another bush loyalist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey! It's not political, though, don't you know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course Attorney General Michael Mukasey wanted to fight this ...
.... that is his job as the Bush family consigliere. This goes right
to a dirty DoJ run by Ashcroft & Gonzales with Rove giving the
orders.

Don Siegleman had the gall to stand up against a dirty vote
in 2002 and had to be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. ExxonMobil’s Alabama Paydirt = Siegelman and Pissing Off Big Oil.
Quite importantly, given who runs the Corrupt Bastards Club (BIG OIL),
this started before the 2002 election was stolen, while Don was governor.
That is when all means to get rid of him went into effect, including
Riley's illegal campaign financing by Abramoff, Scalan, Reed, et.al.

------------
from: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3061537&mesg_id=3065452

ExxonMobil’s Alabama Paydirt
Scott Horton - Nov 4, 2007 - http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001584

Back in 1904, Ida Tarbell published what ultimately was to be seen as the seminal work of the muckrakers, The History of Standard Oil. It appeared first in nineteen installments in McClure’s Magazine, a rather less successful competitor of Harper’s, and shortly after the last installment appeared, Tarbell published the work in book form as well. In her work, Tarbell exposed the dark underside of corporate deal-making, the series of interlocking directorates and manipulations which had allowed John D. Rockefeller to build the oil leviathan and dominate the American market. Tarbell demonstrated that Rockefeller’s success came not so much from business acumen (though she never contested that he had plenty of that) as through a thorough understanding of how to game the system. John D. Rockefeller was a power unto himself. Politicians around the country were made and broken to suit him.

But Tarbell’s disclosures fueled the drive for antitrust legislation and a fairer and more competitive business environment—a drive which was, in its time, championed by progressive politicians of both parties, but particularly by Theodore Roosevelt. By 1911, Standard Oil was broken into thirty companies.

But over time, like the liquid-metal monster in the “Terminator” series, Standard Oil pulled itself back together again. It was aided in this process by a change in attitudes across the political spectrum, but most particularly it was aided by America’s campaign finance system in which politicians standing for election require increasingly larger sums of money to pursue their campaigns, and support from the corporate till is essential. The final act of rebirth occurred when the two principal surviving pieces of the company, Exxon and Mobil, merged at the close of 1999. The resulting behemoth, ExxonMobil, is the largest publicly traded integrated petroleum and natural gas company in the world. It is also the world’s largest petroleum and natural gas company by revenue, with revenues of $377.6 billion in fiscal year 2006.

The State of Alabama believes that it was victimized by ExxonMobil. According to the state’s complaint launched by the Administration of Governor Don Siegelman, ExxonMobil committed fraud and underpaid the state in a contract dispute over natural gas pumped from Mobile Bay. Alabama won that litigation, and a jury awarded the state a judgment against ExxonMobil of roughly $3.6 billion. Not chump change ............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. career Justice Dept. officials need to take a stand!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it time to let Schumer know what we think of his pick for AG?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratInSoCal Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He Doesn't Care....
What are the New Yorkers going to do? Vote him out of office in favor of a repub?

It's like Feinstein here in CA. They are so entrenched, they know they have the Democratic vote, regardless of what they do.

Vote for Iraq. Vote for the Bankruptcy Bill. Vote for Roberts or Alito.

What are you going to do? Screw yourself by voting in a repub? Or do what CT did, and uselessly try to overcome their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. it happens. CT was a unique situatiom where the Pubs needed
Lieberman in the senate so they mobilized for him. Primary challenges are going to become much more relevant with the increasing power of the netroots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Agreed, here's his email. He is part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Schumer -- nice work, any other hacks need a recommendation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's just another HACK
I don't know they confirmed him he's a lying scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. What fabulous news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm surprised Mukasey didn't fight. Do you think his bosses want Siegelman to testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Three events...
1.) Conyers asks DOJ to allow Siegelman to testify.

2.) Mukasey says "No way"

3.) (Unrelated to 1) 11th district court releases Siegelman pending appeal.


Result: Siegelman will testify IN SPITE of Mukasey's refusal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. REPUBLICAN prick
i can't even believe they let him in. jeezus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. I sure hope Siegelman hires some personal security..
I fear for his safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks again, Chuck
If that was the best you could do, I'd hate to see your worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That was my first thought, too. My second is that
Leahy should have held his ground on not allowing hearings until Rove, Miers, and the White House honored the subpoenas on the documents and testifying.

DiFi gets the bird from me on this one, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Mother f@cker. Thanks, Chuck. Thanks, Diane.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. Fucking nazi bastard! Justice is not in his plans for the country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. Mukasey a prick? Shocking, just shocking I say!
The whole lot of them have barely an ounce of human feeling left in the tips of their pinky toes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. Well, sure he was. Read why Conyers said they needed Siegelman's personal testimony
Conyers said that his committee was not getting any cooperation from
the Justice Department. Expecting a Cheneybush "Justice" Department to
have any interest whatsoever in justice is sort of like Linus expecting
the Great Pumpkin to rise on Halloween, anyway. I'll be thrilled as can
be if Siegelman makes it alive to testify in front of Conyers. It makes
me wonder if Mukasey has a time-share lease on some of Halliburton's
property in the Middle East?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
33. too bad there wasn't a week or so's delay between the events
it would have been good to get him further "on the record"

damn, I hope Siegelman has plenty to say and says it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
35. May those Dems who supported Mukasey's confirmation choke in their own spittle,
albeit no offense intended. :mad: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC