Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it a state's right to import nuclear waste?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:40 AM
Original message
Is it a state's right to import nuclear waste?
Bishop says feds shouldn't keep states from importing waste

If states are willing to accept foreign nuclear waste, there's no reason the federal government should prohibit them, says a Utah congressman whose district could get tons of Italian leftovers.

"I don't see it as a federal issue," U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop told The Associated Press.

"If the state of Tennessee wants to take it, and if the state of Utah wants to take it, I'm going to punt it back to them. It is within their purview," the Republican said.

EnergySolutions Inc. wants to import about 20,000 tons of waste from Italian nuclear plants for processing in Tennessee. After processing, about 1,600 tons would be shipped to the company's facility 70 miles west of Salt Lake City — and within Bishop's district —, for disposal. It is the largest and only privately owned radioactive-waste dump in the U.S.

The company's application is at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is taking public comment through June 10.

Morning News


No prob, we know what stewards of the environment U.S. businesses have been. See: Environmental Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Aren't navigable waterways under federal jurisdiction?
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 07:01 AM by bananas
edit to add: I don't think it's possible to get it to Utah or Tennessee without passing through an area which has federal jurisdiction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes
they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If it's a local issue
then Charleston, SC could make themselves a nuclear free zone and they would have to find some other port of entry.\
It would be best, however, if they waited to do this until *just before the first shipment was scheduled to happen.... it'll cost the reprocessing place more that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Transportation (interstate commerce) and storage (enviro)
sure are federal issues.

NRC has an application process; last time I checked, NRC was a federal bureaucracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Also "securing the borders" is in there somewhere... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. We may all develop 'glowing' dispositions when combining Yucca and foreign nuclear imports
Volume for 38 Years: Overall, forty-three states would receive shipments. Fifteen states will experience daily shipments of deadly high-level radioactive waste.

Sierra Club

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC