Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“What’s going on here? Is this legal?” F.B.I. official asked after learning of the N.S.A. operation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:15 AM
Original message
“What’s going on here? Is this legal?” F.B.I. official asked after learning of the N.S.A. operation


NYT's Eric Lichtblau:

...................

In one previously undisclosed episode, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson refused to sign off on any of the secret wiretapping requests that grew out of the program because of the secrecy and legal uncertainties surrounding it, the officials said. With the veil of secrecy around the program, Mr. Thompson was not given access to details of the N.S.A. operation, and he was so uncomfortable with the idea of approving this new breed of wiretap applications that he had a top adviser write a memorandum assessing the legal ramifications. The adviser warned him not to sign the warrant applications because it was unclear where the wiretaps were coming from.

Inside the Federal Bureau of Investigation, meanwhile, technicians stumbled onto the N.S.A.’s program accidentally within 12 hours of its inception, setting off what officials described as a brief firestorm of anxiety among senior officials. Some who had not been told about the program were concerned that the agency was violating laws that required a court order for the singling out of Americans in wiretaps, and they immediately alerted higher-ups to what they had discovered. “What’s going on here? Is this legal?” one F.B.I. official asked after learning of the N.S.A. operation on American soil.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/washington/30nsa.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=lichtblau&st=nyt&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Short Answer: NO
Longer answer--don't sign anything from BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. The question is:
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:26 AM by formercia
Who was under surveillance? My bet is that it had nothing to do with terrorism investigations and everything to do with keeping Bush Gang in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Paul Craig Roberts theorized that the Dems in Congres were ineffectual because they were blackmailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Blackmailed, or because there are powerful businessmen who donate
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 09:50 AM by The Backlash Cometh
to both parties that told them to stay quiet or they won't get campaign money. And I might add, that some of these businessmen may be getting away with a great many indiscretions because they or their family members provide crucial assistance to our military or NSA type organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree. They have probably been illegally spied upon and then
THEIR FAMILIES threatened with anthrax or a bullet if the Congressperson doesn't roll over and play dead. Sometimes I think it's the only rational explanation......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did it ever occur to anyone that if our media was being denied the opportunity
of acting in a manner responsible to the public, so would our FBI?

If you ever see what is happening on a local level in some places, you know the FBI is aware of what is happening, but they do nothing. Why is that? Maybe it's because they have been leashed in the same way the media has been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC