BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:21 PM
Original message |
The Taxpayer Bailout Of Banks And Brokers Has Begun... |
|
(via Atrios) Treasury Agrees to Absorb any Losses to the Fed from Bear Stearns
Video from CNBC (hat tip idoc)
CNBC's Steve Liesman reports on a letter from Treasury Secretary Paulson to New York Fed President Tim Geithner. In the letter, Treasury agrees that the Fed can bill Treasury for any losses from the Bear Stearns deal.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Is there no one out there that can stop this bailout? This is ridiculous that tax payers... |
|
she bail these scumbags out. No one is bailing out the home owners that are loosing there homes due to repo's.... This is pure bullshit.
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Read this about the New 21st. Century Welfare Kings... |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. The Truthout link in his post no longer works |
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:38 PM by sinkingfeeling
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So THAT explains why the market is going up today |
|
Why is it that welfare for the poor is a bad idea, but welfare for the wealthy is a great idea?
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Because nobody like poor folks. |
Turbineguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It seems we don't have a choice |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 01:39 PM by Turbineguy
As a result of lax oversight we can bail out a few people or we can lose our retirement and put the economy into a depression. Yes, Bush gets propped up on this too. But considering we would have had a republican president anyway...
Also, as a point this whole irresponsible lending debacle came about as a result of trying to get poor people into home ownership but more afluent people got on board and overborrowed. The change in the rules were never intended for higher income individuals. But of course the real profitable loans were the big loans.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message |