Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chuck Hagel is scary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:56 PM
Original message
Chuck Hagel is scary
I know his position on the war in Iraq is great and I saw his interview on "The Daily Show" where all they did was discuss war. So I looked around the web to find more info on his voting record thinking he might be a good VP. Oy vey he's scary:

Rated 11% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)

Rated 87% by the US COC, indicating a pro-business voting record. (Dec 2003)

Rated 36% by the NEA, indicating a mixed record on public education. (Dec 2003)

Rated 0% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)

Rated 92% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record. (Dec 2002)

# Rated 12% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)

# Rated 8% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record. (Dec 2003)

Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation. (Dec 2006)

Rated 22% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record. (Dec 2003)



the source:http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Chuck_Hagel.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Merits a long look for SecDef...that's it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. well the environment is a global issue and he got 0% so I'm thinking
sec of state might not be good either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. He all of a sudden is sucking for bipartisanship. Whiner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is positioning for 2012 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Also, Hagel was elected on voting machines manufactured by a company he had been CEO of, which he
conveniently forgot to mention in his CV until someone brought the fact to his attention. Oh well he's human just like all of us. Except not all of us have been CEOs of voting machine companies and not all of us come out of nowhere to win an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess it's all a matter of perspective. He's just a Repub from Nebraska
to me--he's got a certain constituency to represent (and the GOPers here are upset with him--they think he's far too liberal, believe it or not). Even Ben Nelson is pro-life/socially conservative--that's how you get re-elected in a red state that still thinks George W. is an awesome Preznit. Now, I personally find McCain and the rest of the GOP/RW much scarier, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is just Pat Buchanan with better hair.
But not as completely stupid, which is a point in his favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, not quite--Hagel's not racist, isolationist or protectionist . Pat is
in an obnoxious-asshole league of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You claim he is not a racist and yet he gets an 11% rating from NAACP?
He votes like a racist.

Buchanan is indeed an asshole in a league of his own, but Hagel gets a 100% from the Chamber of Commerce and NAM types and 0-10% from "consumer" (that's what they call workers) groups. And he is as bad on other issues as any you can imagine, Dobson and other crazies. Don't be fooled. Look at his record and his loyalties: http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=231
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. This "ranking" shit by various outside groups can be very misleading--
I take it with a grain of salt--I don't know what sort of criteria they're using. Hagel is not known by anyone to be a racist, at least that I've heard. I'm baffled that anyone spends time bashing a guy who sides with the Dems and goes against his party on some important issues, like foreign policy, war and torture--why not bash the majority of GOPers who have no conscience or principles, demonize Dems, question our patriotism, and are wrong on absolutely everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Uh, the "ranking shit" is just based on his votes.
Pick any other issue you care about, assuming you are not a fascist type, and look up his score. The John Birch Society, a fascist org, gives him 90%. If you agree with them on their goals, then Hagel is your kind of guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. No--just because an interest group ranks him a certain way
does not mean he's racist. It's extemely simple-minded to draw that conclusion. The only thing those rankings show is who's generally liberal, who's generally conservative, who's generally centrist. They're a guide, not a definitive indictment of someone's character. But, you can believe whatever you want about whomever. I just find it odd that you're threatened by a guy who's retiring from the Senate. He's not running for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. So you like the fascist types and I don't.
That is your preference and not mine and so be it. You like guys who get a 10% rating from the NAACP and 100% from Dobson's FRC monsters. Not surprised. He (like you?) gets a rating from various conservation groups of 0%. Find one other issue in which you and he agree, and thus establish forever your loyalty to the righies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. wiener,
i'm with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, he is
As a former Nebraskan, I can say that with certainty.

Being right on one issue after 70+% of the country agrees with you is nothing to be congratulated for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. He's ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. here's his record.
Find one, other than Iraq, in which he is OK.
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=231

He is anything but OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. A very powerful Repuke that wants to be POTUS.
If ya can buy an election in a state, ya can do it in a nation. Just ask Chuck. If Hagel scares you, you've been paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Is Romney better?
or Huckleberry?

As v.p., he's 'representing' everyone, so no concerns about local issues. But I doubt the Reps would allow him; he's been on the outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. On the other hand
Hagel is unusual in his party in
other ways. He is liberal on many
social issues that most Republicans
refuse to countenance, such as gay
marriage. Hagel says he regards
marriage as between a man and a
woman, but is relaxed about homosexual
or lesbian marriages. And on
an issue that is too hot even for most
Democrats, burning the Stars and
Stripes, he voted for legislation making
it a crime but said that he could
still see why people might want to do
it as a form of protest.


From the Guardian (UK) last year http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Chuck%20Hagel%20Salon%20--%20Ewen%20MacAskill.pdf

He is a conservative, but definitely not a scary one. Votes do matter, but they can also be easily be misconstrued. Nothing and nobody is black and white as far as I am concerned, and in spite of his conservatism on many issues, Hagel is a very acceptable shade of gray in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC