Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faster computers may use light instead of electricity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:56 PM
Original message
Faster computers may use light instead of electricity
This is greek to me, but thought someone might want to read all about it.


Faster computers may use light instead of electricity
By Robert S. Boyd | McClatchy Newspapers

* Posted on Wednesday, April 2, 2008


TIBM / MCT
This tiny optical switch directs traffic on a computer chip by using light instead of electricity. First an electrical signal is converted into light particles called photons. Then devices on the switch (the black boxes above) route the message from the transmitter to the proper receiver. | View



WASHINGTON — Scientists and engineers are racing to develop ways to use light instead of electricity to avoid traffic jams inside computers.

Today's fastest computers employ miles of tiny copper wires to connect multiple data processors packed on silicon chips. Each little ``brain'' — in effect, a miniature adding machine — must exchange information with hundreds or thousands of partners on the same or connecting chips.

The data — symbolized as strings of zeroes and ones — ride the wires in the form of electrical signals, generating heat and wasting energy. Even so, the data can't move fast enough to keep up with the speed of the central processing units.

``The weakest link in the overall capability of the computer is the ability to move information from chip to chip,'' said John Stroman, a computer design strategist at Intel Corp., the big computer-chip maker based in Santa Clara, Calif. ``Moving information around is the biggest limitation on the performance of computers, and it becomes a greater limitation as CPUs become faster.''

Computer scientists think that the solution may be photons, the tiny packets of energy that make up a beam of light. Photons aren't the same as electrons, the fundamental particles of electricity.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/32446.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bad ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems a variant of fiber optic technology
And it's only between cores; not the technology itself. Electronics and electricity is still a core necessity, no pun intended...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. My brother is a computer wizard, and he has told me about computer limitations...
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 08:02 PM by Buzz Clik
... due to the use of electricity. Apparently, some claims about computer speed are misleading and meaningless because the flow of electrons through finite distances in wires is the limitation. It's a bit confusing to me, but if that's true, then using light will only help a little.

I guess.

I'd have my brother post the explanation here, but he's a conservative and, well, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've heard its somewhat about how little electricity/light you can use.
Faster means smaller, so littler electric signals. But you get small enough, things stop behaving classically (in ways that make sense) and start getting all quantum, which is where problems come in because they are not being predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, that's the kind of stuff he starts talking about. btw -- about your name...
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 08:21 PM by Buzz Clik
Is that a Dylan reference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah.
You used to be so amused
At Napoleon in rags and the language that he used
Go to him now, he calls you, you can't refuse
When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose
You're invisible now, you got no secrets to conceal.


Form "Like a Rolling Stone"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. After reading that article yesterday about programmable, man-made DNA
I'm thinking biological computers might not be far off.

LIVING computers. :scared: :shrug: ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I need William Gibson to explain this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Over 20 Years Ago,
I read an article in Scientific American on work towards developing an optical semiconductor, one that would have the additional advantage of being to store more than a simple on or off per bit. In other words, rather than using binary, the machine could use base 3, base 10, or base 100. It would be a cliff-like change in speed and capability.

Been waiting twenty years to hear more about development.

ジャネエフsリボフン
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. can gamers keep up?
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. 5 bucks says...
microsoft's latest OS for those machines still manages to fuck something up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC