Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OINK< OINK!! Congress still pigging out on pork-barrel projects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:16 AM
Original message
OINK< OINK!! Congress still pigging out on pork-barrel projects
Congress still pigging out on pork-barrel projects: watchdog group
By Robert Brodsky - April 2, 2008 - http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed0408/040208rb1.htm


What does a fruit fly research project in Paris, a sheep utilization program in Montana and a lobster institute in Maine all have in common? The insane ramblings of a mad-zoologist with too much time on his hands? Not quite.

In fact, the three aforementioned projects were all supported in 2007 by taxpayer-funded earmarks and are among examples of allegedly wasteful spending highlighted in the 18th annual Congressional Pig Book. Published by Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonpartisan watchdog group ....

top three senators in total earmark dollars all sit on the committee. Ranking member Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., received $892 million in earmarks; Stevens brought home $469 million; and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., got $465 million.

The top three earmarkers in the House also sat on the Appropriations Committee. Roger Wicker, formerly a Republican member of the House and now a senator, led the way with $176 million. He was followed by Rep. Bill Young, R-Fla., ($169 million) and Defense Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha, D-Pa. ($159 million).

In total, Democrats received 55 percent of the 2008 earmarks ....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. They will have to pry the earmarks
from Ted Stevens' cold, dead fingers. Even after Gov. Palin suggested that he might want to cool it, he still carries on. He just can't help himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nice Talking Points...
Not all government grants or spending are "pork". It's easy to put up the dollar amount and some off-the-wall foundation and avoid providing the context as to why the money is being allocated. Some "pork" ends up going to the very people who elect these people and either create or preserve jobs all over the country. Yes, some pad their pockets, but a lot of the "pork" spending is meant to stimulate the economy back home...what these people are sent to Washington in the first place.

Isn't it something how little we heard about "pork" when the GOOP were in charge, but how it's a big issue now? Yep, the mighty wurlitzer still can spin quite a tune...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Indeed. How much "pork" is in the defense spending bill, etc.... hidden herds of swine everywhere
I imagine.

Then, how much is over-paid in no-bid contracts to cronies like Halliburton, Blackwater, etc..... yet another hear of swine...

How much spending at GSA was directed to political ends ... more pigs at the public trough ....

Oh yeah, do we need to pay for guys like Rove working on political affairs inside the White House .... another swine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC