Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Richards (Kramer) was doing standup too, when he called people a name in bad taste

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:13 PM
Original message
Michael Richards (Kramer) was doing standup too, when he called people a name in bad taste
So do you the Randi supporters agree with with him on that one now?

Nothing wrong with what he said, right? it was just a joke. Odd that people held him accountable for that one, don't they know he was in a comedy club?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. you have been working hard on that angle haven't you?
did your finger slip off the drool on your keyboard in your haste to post this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I insult you back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Troll harder, dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. How is that trolling?
In all sincerity, would you explain the meaning you gleaned from the juxtoposition of Randi's insult with Kramer's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. Rest assured, he will.
They always do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Indeed.
"Troll? Moi? Whatevah do yo-ahh mean?" (fans self coyly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I brought that up in another thread
When you're a comic, everything seems like a good idea at the time. However, humor can have a major blowback.

3 examples:

Don Imus and the now infamous "Nappy headed ***s" comment: Imus was, in fact, making use of a reference in a then-popular hip-hop song. Imus suffered personally and professionally.

Michael Richard's ill fated satire of hip-hop culture (the now-infamous "N" word rant). Richards suffered personally and professionally.

Rosanne Barr's National Anthem: This is the joke that no one got. She sang the National Anthem between games at a ladies day double header in San Diego. Her screeching, crotch scratching rendition was intended to poke fun at male baseball watchers (who scratch and sing off key at ball games). The joke fell flat, and Roseanne suffered personally and professionally.


Bottom line: Randi has been in the radio business a long time and should have known better. She knows he deal; she makes her money based on her employer's ability to sell advertising on her show. If she wants to quit and do stand-up, so she can say what she wants, fine. If she wants to do her own webcast/podcast and sell her own advertising, again, fine. Otherwise, she should enjoy her unpaid vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. "you Randi supporters"
I have never listened to Randi (we don't get AAR in our area)

but I am amused as to how many people clinton supporters wish to throw under the bus.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They want to blame everyone but the one person responsible for Hillary's failure
Guess who that is...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Spefically referring to people arguing in favor of Randi on this issue
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:25 PM by Prefer
And for the record I am one who listens to Randi, loves Randi, and also dislikes and is critical of certain aspects of her on the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I Can't Wait Until She Apologizes
like those before her, Imus, Matthews, Schultz, Kramer, Gibson.

Or will she pull a Geraldine Ferraro, and refuse to apologize.

How ironic, she calls Ferraro a whore when she should have stood by her for sticking to her guns on Free Speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That is ironic
...and yes, the mea culpa should be interesting.

I didn't mean it like it sounded....I have the deepest respect....I apologize if anyone was offended....I know it looks like I'm a shill for the other campaign, but I'm not.....blah, bhah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chixydix Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Watch out, the Double Standard Bearers will be all over you like stink on shit
for that!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. You've missed the first rule of DU.
Overtly bigoted racist comments are horrifying, and the people who make them should be shunned. Overtly bigoted sexist comments - if you have a problem with those, apparently you're a right wing religious fundie prude. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yes, I guess that is the crux. Thank You
Made me laugh also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kind of like joking about sniper fire
on the eve of the anniversary of Dr. King being killed by a sniper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Bizarre.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Make sure you warm up before you stretch so far...
You might get hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Before the sniper lie, she was merely distasteful to me.
After the sniper lie, she became vile to me.

After the sniper joke, she became a monster to me.

I actually forgave Kramer much more than I will ever find it in myself to forgive her.

She is a disgusting human being for boasting about courage she has never displayed and challenges she has never faced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Well, we all have personal thresholds...
I can understand, honestly, why HRC evokes such rage. And that's cool. But I'm not about to call anybody a fucking whore because I disagree with them, nor would I applaud or defend anyone else saying that. And I can swear like a drunken sailor with the best of 'em.

Guess I have a different idea of what it means to be a "progressive voice".

Peace, have a good weekend....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's so bizarre to see people so upset over anyone getting into trouble
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:41 PM by sfexpat2000
for a bit of stand up.

Every comedian has a story about being suspended or fired or banned.

/spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Here's what I don't get
In another thread, a poster wrote in that no progressive would ever condone the use of "FW"

But progressives were the ones who worked to clear the way for Richard Pryor (frequent "n-word" user) and Lenny Bruce to do their thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Sure. But, the bar is in a different place today.
If I was in their audience now, I'd kick their @sses. lol :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Are you saying that what Randi did was the equivalent of using N****R??
Seriously? You think a female performer referring to a prominent female politician as a whore (something many politicians are called) is the same as a famous white actor calling some anonymous black audience members n****rs??

You gotta be kidding me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. They're not kidding
.. and for the record, Michael Richards is an actor, but is also a stand-up commedian. He was making what turned out to be a really misunderstood satire of hip-hop culture.

That said, I agree -- the "w" word is applied all the time to pols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. No, I am not saying that
I am not really saying anything, I just wanted to pose the two together and see how people felt they were similar or different.

I am thinking from all of this that it doesn't matter as much what you say, but what it means. What Randy meant I felt was in outrageously bad taste. If she had simply said "sellout" instead of whore it would have not have had such bad taste that reflected poorly on a lot of people. She was being the callous egdy rock chick howard stern that she sees her image as, and it didn't work for me. I thought it was tasteless even if I agree with what she said.

I support free speech, but that doesn't equate so endorsing bad taste. The Kramer thing points out that no matter who you are, you are responsible for you own poor decisions.

Separate issue - is AA taking it out on her? Yes. Probably to take care of:

Separate issue - should she be endorsing Obama and attacking Hillary? From a management standpoint, no. Bad business. Turns half the audience off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Let me address one thing you said
should she be endorsing Obama and attacking Hillary? From a management standpoint, no. Bad business. Turns half the audience off.

This has been said a number of times and it's one of the most ridiculous misconceptions about talk radio. Randi is PAID to have opinions. So is every talk radio host out there.

She's already "turning off" a good portion of the audience by being a liberal. Should she change that? She "turns off" more of the audience by being an outspoken woman. Perhaps she should give that up as well.

The simple truth is that far fewer than half of AAR's core audience support Hillary. And only a small fraction of those are so thin-skinned that they can't handle hearing an opposing viewpoint.

I guarantee you, if Randi hid her disdain for Hillary's tactics and pretended to be even-handed, she'd lose a lot more than half her audience. That's just not what her show is about.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Good argument
I am compelled to agree but, she is paid to have progressive opinions, not to narrow down the scope of progressive opinions. She's not paid to infight.

As far as thin skinned, a turnoff is a turn off and it gets turned off. Thats what the management is minding.

She was pretty good about reporting and not condemning for the most part, relatively fair I think even in being open about supporting Obama. It was the level that it brought the dialog to that was a problem. Name calling isn't even desirable on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. It is in the sense that they were both in stand up mode
and not in politically correct mode. They both overshot their marks. That's when bad things happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Right, it's just how you meant it and whether it was funny or not
When Lenny Bruce did it, it was inclusive and he was having us all laughing at the whole mindset of the racist.

Here's an example from a skit called "How to make black people feel comfortable at parties". So, Lenny is making fun of the Archie Bunker in people in this piece, playing the character. He has already told the guy that "Some of my best friend are black"...

Lenny: "Yeah, I'd have you over to the house, but I got a sister, you know, and ... put it this way, you wouldn't want no Jew doin' it your sister, would you? Well I don't want no coon doin' it to mine."

Extremely tastless on the surface, and yet funny because we are laughing at the racist ridiculing himself.

So for Randi to have call the women "whore" in a tasteful or funny way, it would have had to laugh at people who use the word whore in seriousness. What she did was use the word in a way that was demeaning to women and she did it to attack her political opponant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yep. These are the interstices that good comedians play in
all the time. And they are the ones that less skillful comics should stay the hell out of.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Whore...
does NOT always mean prostitute or slut and I don't think that's the definition Randi meant. Clinton has been hanging out with the likes of Richard Mellon Scaife (right winger that funded a huge smear campaign of lies about the Clintons during the 1990's). Of all the people for her to hang out with, I never would have expected her to hang out with a guy that accused her of murder. Seems like a sell-out to me. Randi should have known better or at least clarified it, and I think the suspension is good for her. She needs to chill the fuck out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chixydix Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Boy howdy, talk about mexed missages...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. She meant sellout, but when you call women that it takes on a new evocation
so I don't think it is an excuse. But I am in agreement with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. That was an incident of fanning the flames by the media.
The audience can respond to an offensive entertainer. The media doesn't need to fan the flames.

Randi was just telling it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Unless you disagree with her, in which case she wasn't.
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:40 PM by sfexpat2000
Or, unless you just find her remarks offensive, in which case she was being offensive.

So many choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. If her audience found her offensive, they could deal with her at the venue.
Case closed. No need for Air America or the media to fan the flames. See? It's really the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I'm not really not on Randi's side. But who is her audience, exactly?
Just the people in that room, people who watch youtube, her radio audience? All serially? It's not that simple which is why AAR sets a standard for their hosts when they appear in other venues. That AAR management may also be petty @ssholes with an agenda is another thing and of course, their right.

This little drama may end up being good for her and for AAR in the long run, in any case. But we will always have our two hundred threads defending Randi for what could be theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I realize it may well be just theater. It usually is. But I'm older and weary
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 05:55 PM by valerief
of all the false outrage of the finger waggers. Randi could say, "Dick Cheney eats poo-poo tacos for breakfast," and people could cry, "That's disgusting!" and I'd come to her defensive. I'm so sick of the easily outraged, not the showmen (like Randi) stirring the pot. Randi's a wealth of information and says so many enlightening things on her show that the FWs won't. The finger waggers have already screwed up this country enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. BINGO
and I'm also wary of the this is the way it has always been done as well, since that does not necessarily mean it is correct

I also fear we already lost the country and this is just a symptom of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Yes, that gets really tiresome. I agree.
I don't listen to Randi because I've heard enough "language" and ranting to last me the rest of my life after more than ten years dealing with stand ups including here at home. But, that's just my taste and not something to offload all over the place. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. hey now, air America could use a shock jock
maybe this will make randi the liberal ann coulter. Good for ratings, at least. Now we know where she stands. I don't care, personally, of they fire her or not. But if they don't, we learn what air America stands for. Good information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. richards verbally attacked an audience member - not the same
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 06:01 PM by spanone
it was not part of his routine.....he 'lost it' on stage....it's not a fair comparison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. I think it's very fair. They both screwed up.
They both thought their context was shared enough by their audience that they could push the envelope and they were both wrong. He went off on anonymous people, she went off on Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. apples/oranges....richards lost his cool and called an audience member the N word
not the same the audience member is not a politician who is fair game for comedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. When have audience members not been fair game for comedy?
I thought that's why they were there. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. I agree with you
Too much double standard. And there's nothing funny about calling women and female leaders 'fucking whores'.

Randi Rhodes is consistently rude and annoying so this doesn't really surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
46. I was listening to Sam Sedar filing in for Randi today.
I am not quite sure what he was talking about but he said that whether he agrees or not with her being suspended, Air America has that policy and they are allowed to have it.

I do not know what policy Sam was talking about but I know he is an intelligent man because I have listened to him long enough and read one of his books. He would not talk out of his backside about a policy of some sort if one was not in place.

At first I was taken aback that they would suspend Randi. Then I thought about the fact that it was an AAR sponsored event and she WAS representing that company so I figured if it was on her own time they had no right but if she is representing AAR in a bad light then they have a right to defend themselves through suspension. But after hearing that AAR has an actual policy in place for these types of things, I equate it with pharmacists not selling birth control. YOu know the rules and what your job is before hand and if you do not do your job as you were warned and agreed to do by signing a contract, you are fair game for reparations.

Comparing Randi to Michael is comparing apples and oranges. Michael was representing himself and not some big corporation. He did not sign a work contract and go out on the road representing a corporation. Although neither was right in what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. A stand up is always repping him/herself AND the venue or venues.
If Randi had said what she said in the Safeway parking lot, it would still have been in public and she would still be in trouble if her remarks got bad publicity or even, had the POTENTIAL to get bad publicity.

Ditto for Richards. If he'd said what he said in the gift shop of his hotel and the booker or club owner found out about it, he'd also have been in trouble.

And THAT is a good reason to 1) hire unflappable handlers or 2) go into IT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteinbachMB Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
48. Richards always did standup
and that is the way it should be taken. But we live in a wussified society, so everyone is fair game. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. What an odd post.
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 07:44 PM by lwfern
Who is "wussified"? The people complaining about racist/sexist slurs?

Or the people using racist/sexist slurs who start whining when someone calls them on it?

----------------

Sounds to me like you want black people and women to be fair game, but people using racist/sexist slurs not to be. Your own use of slightly homophobic/misogynistic "wussified" is duly noted. Apologies if our society is not suitably macho for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Macarena Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. I love Kramer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC