Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Winning Ugly in Wisconsin - Talk about a Swiftboat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:04 AM
Original message
Winning Ugly in Wisconsin - Talk about a Swiftboat
If you have the chance - read this story about a liberal judge who was totally railroaded by a conservative judge - and who just lost his seat to the conservative. Something really NEEDS to be done about these 3rd party groups who have no accountability but seemingly unlimited $$$ to run false ads against people.


Winning Ugly in Wisconsin
April 4, 2008
In Wisconsin's Supreme Court race the winner was on the side that threw the most mud.
Summary
In a Wisconsin throwdown, incumbent Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler narrowly lost his reelection bid after being hit with a barrage of deceptive attack ads. We've written about some of them in recent weeks.

Attack ads targeting the incumbent heavily outnumbered attacks aimed at the business-backed winner, Circuit Court Judge Mike Gableman. In the closing days of the campaign the ratio was roughly 2 to 1.

A misleading attack ad that ran hundreds of times implied that the incumbent overturned a murder conviction despite overwhelming evidence of the convicted man's guilt. Actually, Butler based his ruling on new DNA evidence that undercut a key part of the prosecution's case.

One of the most heavily run ads of the campaign misleadingly accused the incumbent of focusing on "needless technicalities" when, on an evidentiary question, he sided with a husband accused of poisoning his wife in the well-publicized "letter from the grave" case. In fact, the point Butler raised was a question of constitutional rights important enough for the U.S. Supreme Court to have taken on in its current term.

Butler blamed his narrow loss on heavy spending by independent groups that he said "siphoned huge amounts of money into this race" without disclosing where it came from. We can't say for sure that money or misleading attacks were decisive in this race. However, the facts are that the margin of victory was small, and most of the mud was slung by the winning side.

Story continued at link: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/winning_ugly_in_wisconsin.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sickening that even the judicial branch of state gov. is poisoned by this.
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 11:36 AM by MidwestTransplant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. just goes to show that supposedly aware
Wi citizens who voted for Feingold's no mud campaigns and who did not fall for Clinton's lies about Obama not willing to debate, are susceptible to the lies and mud of negative campaigning. What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree..
This shows that justice truly can be "bought". If you have enough money, you can throw it around, make up lies and fabrications and sell them on TV to get yourself a position. No wonder this country doubts its government - but I do think people need to do a much better job of investigating issues themselves instead of swallowing whatever the media is selling that day (or week or month).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC