THE NEW YORK TIMES: PORK BARREL REMAINS HIDDEN IN U.S. BUDGET

[L. Coyote]

THE NEW YORK TIMES: PORK BARREL REMAINS HIDDEN IN U.S. BUDGET
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/31371

7 Apr 2008 // Sometimes on Capitol Hill, lawmakers find that it pays to ask nicely instead of just ordering the bureaucrats around.

With great fanfare, Congress adopted strict ethics rules last year requiring members to disclose when they steered federal money to pet projects. But it turns out lawmakers can still secretly direct billions of dollars to favored organizations by making vague requests rather than issuing explicit instructions to government agencies in committee reports and spending bills. That seeming courtesy is the difference between “soft earmarks” and the more insistent “hard earmarks.”

How much money is requested for any specific project? It is difficult to say, since price tags are not included with soft earmarks. Who is the sponsor? Unclear, unless the lawmaker later acknowledges it. Purpose of the spending? Usually not provided.

How to spot a soft earmark? Easy. ..........

[n2doc]

1. Biggest pork barrel of all is the Iraq War n/t