Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS considering outsourcing news-gathering to CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:56 PM
Original message
CBS considering outsourcing news-gathering to CNN
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 10:57 PM by housewolf
April 8, 2008
CBS Said to Consider Use of CNN in Reporting
By TIM ARANGO

CBS, the home of the most celebrated news division in broadcasting, has been in discussions with Time Warner about a deal to outsource some of its news-gathering operations to CNN, two executives briefed on the matter said Monday.

Over the last decade, CNN has held intermittent talks with both ABC News and CBS News about various joint ventures. But during the last several months, talks with CBS have been revived and lately intensified, according to the executives who asked for anonymity because of the confidential nature of the negotiations.

Broadly speaking, the executives described conversations about reducing CBS’s news-gathering capacity while keeping its frontline personalities, like Katie Couric, the CBS Evening News anchor, and paying a fee to CNN to buy the cable network’s news feeds.

Another possibility, these people said, would be for CBS to keep its correspondents in certain regions but pair them with CNN crews.

But, these people cautioned, no deal was imminent. Sandy Genelius, a spokeswoman for CBS News, said, “We are extremely pleased with and proud of our news-gathering operation. No outside arrangements are being negotiated.” A CNN spokeswoman said, “we don’t comment on speculative business matters.”

For CNN, a deal with a broadcast network would mean a new revenue stream without having to add much in costs. For CBS, an arrangement with a cable channel would allow it to cut costs while maintaining the CBS News brand, although in a much trimmed-down fashion. CBS is mired in last place amid the continuing struggles of Ms. Couric, who was given a $15 million a year contract, to attract new viewers.

The discussions are being led by Sean McManus, the president of CBS News, and Jim Walton, president of the CNN news group. Many questions remain regarding unions, rights issues and the level of involvement of other CBS News products like “60 Minutes” and “The Early Show.”

If a significant deal is reached between CNN and CBS, it would mark a watershed in broadcast history, a strategic shift in the face of changing market forces by the network that is widely credited as having invented television news, establishing a powerful tradition with journalists like Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite.

In 2007, however, “CBS Evening News With Katie Couric” was in third place, averaging 6.43 million viewers a night, down 13.4 percent from 2006, according to Nielsen Media Research. ABC averaged 8.38 million viewers for its nightly newscast, and NBC averaged 8.29 million. (Fox, the fourth major broadcast network, does not have a national newscast; Fox News Channel is a cable network like CNN.)

In the morning, CBS News is also the perennial third-place finisher. In 2007 “The Early Show” on CBS averaged 2.5 million viewers, less than half that of NBC’s “Today,” which averaged 5.38 million. ABC’s “Good Morning America” averaged 4.77 million.

CNN and CBS have had a long flirtation, and there is no guarantee that this latest round of talks will be any more fruitful. In 1998, it emerged publicly that the two sides were talking about an extensive joint venture, and later, in 2002, CNN was close to reaching a deal with ABC News, but those talks eventually broke down over control issues.

More recently, CNN and CBS talked about sharing resources in Baghdad in order to save money but no deal was reached, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.

None of the corporations that own the three broadcast networks break out financial figures for their news divisions, but advertising revenue tends to closely track ratings.

Combined, according to estimates from TNS Media Intelligence, the three evening newscasts brought in about $478 million in advertising revenue in 2006, the last full year in which figures are available. The morning shows generate much more in advertising revenue, a combined $1.4 billion in 2006.

Both of those figures were down slightly from the previous year, underscoring the fact that, at least for now, broadcast news is still a sizable, although declining, business.

While broadcast television as a medium is in decline because new platforms — the Internet, mobile devices — are fragmenting audiences, the problems at CBS News are more acute. While overall evening news viewership across the three networks declined 5 percent last year, CBS’s fell 13 percent.

In its recently released annual report titled “The State of the News Media,” the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which is led by Tom Rosenstiel, stated that broadcast news outlets needed to diversify more quickly across platforms if they were to survive.

“In the end,” according to the report, “if the problems of network news can be mostly attributed to the decline in the overall audience of broadcast network television generally rather than something having to do with the newscasts in particular, then the survival of the networks’ news divisions in some ways may well depend on their liberating themselves from the broadcast television platform on which they were founded — and even perhaps from the networks themselves.”

Bill Carter contributed reporting.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/business/media/08cbs.html?_r=1&ei=5088&en=2b319a66f0f1b0bc&ex=1365307200&oref=slogin&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=print




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. CNN does news?
I haven't noticed much real reporting there lately; every time I turn on what used to be the headline news channels it's all celebrity fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yet the BBC has a reporter in every nook and crany of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Murrow is rolling in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. The swiftboating of Dan Rather
and the substitution of Couric has been a disaster. This should provide the final nail in the network's coffin.

It's a pity the stockholders can't sue the management and board of directors for malpractice. Their incompetence has been absolutely stunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why not? Its not like its a core function of a news company to gather news.
Get some illegal aliens to do it or something. Providing us with a non-stop stream of opining assholes is what REAL news networks are sall about. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. LOL! Welcome to DU!
CNN is a FAUX wanna-be these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Some days, it just feels like April 1st over and over again
These people really haven't got a clue how little they actually contribute to informed discussion!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for the heads-up, housewolf. It's another nail in the coffin of the First Amendment.
Ben Bagdikian described media consolidation in his book "The Media Monopoly" -- from hundreds of independently owned newspapers and broadcast stations to a few dozen has moved now to just a handful. To further blacken the bottom line, these surviving giants have cut back on their main responsibility in a democracy, the dissemination of truth to the electorate.

Oops! I said, "democracy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Some people say...
... that "TV journalism" ranks right up there with "jumbo shrimp" or "peacekeeping force" at the very top of the oxymoron charts.

So if CBS outsourced their news gathering operations to CNN, who'd notice? They've both got inane little cutie-pie figureheads to chirp happily and tell you what and how to think.

And of course they probably share the copyright on "some people say" sneak attack "journalism."

Best practice is to completely ignore both of them, along with the rest of the insipid clowns on NBCABCFOX et al who pretend to deliver useful information while breathlessly gushing about the latest D-list celebrity screw-up or fundie mother of three who killed them all because gawd said so.

Lose the "on-air talent," as they're called these days -- since everybody has stopped pretending that they're even remotely related to actual journalists or reporters and classified them as the feather-headed whores that they are -- and us the TV for Moyers and Frontline and as a monitor for the DVD player.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's all we need is more consolidation of news and information
Not that they give us much news and important information anyway, but this would make it even worse. And are the folks at CBS so dumb that they can't figure out that many people stopped watching their news when they hired a lightweight like Katie Couric as anchor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. How Your News Is Cheapened And Manipulated
One big reason we hear so little about Iraq or much of what the world is doing or thinking is how cheap our corporate media has gotten. In Vietnam, all the networks had large staffs in Saigon and reporters all around the country...bringing the real war home. Not this invasion...it was too expensive...the networks long ago cut budgets and staff...the news department is to make a profit, period. Investigators and journalists were replaced by stenographers...a lot easier to deal with and they're not concerned with the truth as much as they are their own egos and careers. The precious few who actually are journalists are marginalized as they don't have the "personality" or "exposure" and thus not the credibility.

I've long given up on the "Tiffany Network". Couric has been a total bust out and this once proud news division has been cheapened over 25 years of "deregulation" into a joke. Here's more useless belt tightening that will put fewer voices and people in charge of the source of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. I thought they just pulled those stories out of their butts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well, it's about time that we of my generation faced facts
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 06:33 AM by PCIntern
and that life as we knew it is over.

When I was a kid in the 50's ABC News was non-existent, NBC was filled with RWers like Lawrence Spivak and Huntley/Brinkley/McGee were not exactly unbiased...the best of that bunch was Edwin Newman. the only real voices were at CBS including Sevareid and many solid correspondents of which Rather was later and the least as far as I'm concerned. when Rather got the gig over Mudd, they began their long descent. I know there are some Rather fans here but believe me, he's no hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. CBS' problem in a word: Couric
She's a moron ..... and that's being charitable. She is almost unwatchable. Check that. She *is* unwatchable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC