Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 11:58 PM
Original message |
Iraq, exactly what is the mission? |
|
I keep hearing finish the mission ... what the hell is the mission?
9/11 .... no link WMDs ... none there To check Iran .... Iran now is a stronger "player" in the region Democracy ..... please 75% + of Iraqis want us gone but we are staying GWAT (Global War on Terror) ..... we are helping to build a world wide anti Western terrorist movement al Qaeda ..... between 1,500 and 3,000 al Qaeda fighters who are not Iraqis (Iraq Study Group) Help the Iraqi People ..... the numbers are too grim to even speak of them Mideast Stability ...... Turkey v Kurds, Israel into Lebanon, Iraqi refugee crisis, Iran shelling northern Iraq ..... and so on.
Last two things oil and money from government "bids" .... bingo
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I think, to put it shortly, to get a pro-US government that is stable and is willing to do business. |
|
That's the long-term goal, I guess.
Short term? Make a shitload of money off war contracts. War is a racket, as Gen. Smedley Butler said.
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message |
2. We stay there forever, in a constant state of conflict to serve |
|
as a warning to Iran and Syria: "We can do this to YOUR country, too."
We don't have to win. We can just ruin your country.
|
napoleon_in_rags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. You may be right, but its a hell of an expensive message to send. |
|
"We'll sink trillions into screwing up in YOUR country too!"
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think the only part missing is the ability to get the oil out - |
|
If they could do that, it'd be game, set and match.....
then the war WOULD pay for itself.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |