Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Memo Signed By Bush, AUTHORIZING TORTURE, Surfaces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:13 PM
Original message
Memo Signed By Bush, AUTHORIZING TORTURE, Surfaces
So, last year I had breakfast with former Reagan Adm. official George E. Lowe and he described to me how the implementation of the Bush Administration torture policy probably went down.

As it turns out, Lowe's call was highly accurate and about an hour ago George Lowe called to tell me that a memo, part of the process which had probably set the whole Bush Administration torture regime in motion, is publicly available. How about that.
Ray McGovern has pointed the way to an NSC action memo, signed by George W. Bush himself, which initiated the process under which an entire torture regime, which used methods that violate not only the Geneva Conventions but also US anti-torture laws signed by Bill Cinton, came to be.

(Much much more)
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/10/95033/2181/104/493151>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it impeachment yet?
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 05:17 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It certainly should be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not until we can prove he got a BJ
Sorry, thems the rulez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyclimber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I didn't used to think I could do it
but at this point I'm ready to take one for the team. :puke:

I will need lots of Clorox to gargle with afterwards. Can anyone assist?

-lefty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I offered the same
a few months ago. Someone DID say they would hold my hair back for me. Seriously, we'll impeach someone for a blow job, but not for getting us into a war using LIES?? Katrina... who gives a fuck? Warrantless wiretaps...oh well! Torture...who cares? The list goes on, and fucking on. Come on, Georgie boy, I'll blow you like you've never been blown...as long as you will be impeached afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vilis Veritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. Gannon probably beat you to it...
We need to think outside the box.

I wonder if to catching Bush on film shoving a crucifix up his ass whilst Cheney and Condi dressed in rubber flog his nipple-clamped chest...

I could loan the cause some riding crops...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. Talk About Torture For The Giver of That BJ
:scared: :scared:
:hi: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I LOVE this picture, seemslikeadream!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks whereismyparty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
44. Me too
The chemtrails are a nice touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. OFF THE TABLE!
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Slate.com has had that memo up for a while now. Since 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjr5 Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. Where is everybody??
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 12:28 PM by jjr5
HEELOOOO!!!Time to start impeachment proceedings! Impeachment doesn't have to be a long, drawn out process. It can actually be as short as a month. Plus, Nancy Pelosi would be in power AND we would look like the stronger party. It doesn't matter if Nancy Pelosi wouldn't be elected to that position - that's not the precedence we should be worried about. The precedence that is of worry is that of torture and all of the other atrocities the Bush Admin. has carried out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. George, it's The Hague on line 4. Your room is ready.
Come for a visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. Nope. He took care of that also.
As corroborating evidence, Bush's August 3, 2003 signing of the "Hague Invasion Law" which asserted a US right top use military force to liberate Americans held by the International Criminal Court at the Hague indicate Mr. Bush was aware of the possibility that Americans might be charged with crimes under international law. Bush's signing of the law was part of a broader attack against the new war crimes court at the Hague, by the United States, which was underway at the time Bush signed the August 2003 legislation.:cry: :rofl: :banghead: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. it sickens me. this bu$h* is gonna walk away from this clusterfuck
the surge was a brilliant move to keep us in iraq till they are out of office

the democratic congress shames me for not impeaching this sob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Our government is criminally out of control. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karab Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. too bad
Too bad we'll have to wait until January for the War Crimes trials to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well, at least he won't be able to pardon anyone then.
Of course, that's assuming he (or a surrogate) is not still in office due to another stolen election, a convenient terrorist attack, etc.

Hi, karab! Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. Will Pelosi have grown a conscience in that time? Unlikely. We need to knock her off of her perch.
What legal means are available to do this, bar voting her out of office? What steps would have to be taken to install a Speaker to whom rules and laws matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Impeachment? I'll settle for trial in Federal Court. Criminal trial.
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 06:55 PM by dave123williams
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002340---A000-.html

As it turns out, ordering people to be tortured is a serious federal crime, under American law:

§ 2340A. Torture

(a) Offense.— Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a) if—
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.
(c) Conspiracy.— A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

And no, lurking conservative morons....it doesn't matter if you do the torture outside the US, or not. Or whom you torture. Or for whatever reason/justification/lie you have handy. Fighting terrorism is NOT an excuse:

No need to worry about the Hague, or international law on this one.

This arrogant fuck has, in all likelihood, ordered people tortured to death.

Ergo, that makes our falsely pious smirking jackass of a President eligible for.....wait for it....the death penalty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Works for me.
I just hope I live so long as to see it. Or even some of it. Even a little tiny bit of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. Thanks for the education.
1. Who is in charge of prosecuting such an illegal act? Presumably it cannot be the Department of Justice, for they seem under the Beck and Call of the Executive.

2. If the Department of Justice will not/cannot prosecute, and if "Impeachment is off the Table" is the attitude of most in Congress, instead of just Rep. Pelosi, then who shall make the arrest and enforce the law?

3. Is there any law left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Here are the answers, sadly.

1. The Department of Justice.

2. Nobody, evidently.

3. You tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. I posted this as well.
You posted it first, however, mine is the dupe...so please allow me to k&r your post.

This is an important one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. But...Commander AWOL Bush has lied repeatedly about this...
to the citizens of the United States of America
and the world community.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Impeach Commander AWOL & Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' for
War crimes and lies to Congress and the American people.

Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcollier Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. We sure did leave the American
government in good hands... And the reason McCain has a shot at the Presidency is many Americans don't seem to mind who is running the country into the ditch... Foolland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. But madame speaker refuses to follow the Constitution, hence enabling the torture regime
yep, she will belong with them on the docket, and this gives me no pleasure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
42. And since she is complicit, can she also be indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's gonna be Darth's Oswald
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. And Failure To Impeach "Authorizes" Bushcheney
Because torture and war crimes can be aided and abetted both before and AFTER the fact.

Certainly the bushcheney war criminals have earned themselves a place in infamy via moral treason against our once-great nation.

But the oxymoronic mumblings of DC Dems, as they continue to ignore the rotting elephant carcass in our national living room, are no less an enabling of the ongoing horror. And moreover, a willful abrogation of both our treaty obligations and US Constitutional demands.

Only impeachment holds out any hope to reunite the American People around our core principles.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. kick & rec
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 08:21 AM by caseycoon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. WE DO NOT TORTURE
How many times did he say that to the American people?

Shouldn't that hold the same weight as Bill Clinton saying I did not have sexual relations with that woman?

ONLY WAY MORE SERIOUS??

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT TORTURE

IMPEACHMENT NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
25. they all need to be sent to the Hague
what the fuck is wrong with congress??? enough with the committee hearings get them out!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
26. The great tragedy is that nobody cares.
Oh, WE care. But most people don't. It's a lot easier to just go on with your life and worry about whether your team is gonna win next weekend than it is to give any attention to this stuff. I just don't think anything will happen. They could announce that Bush has a rack in the basement of the White House where he likes to go down in the evenings and watch people being stretched and screaming, and nobody would care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. .but maybe times are changing...


Bush's approval took another dive and folks are starting to see the chaos the Crime Family has caused in the country. Economy wrecked, jobs gone, airlines that don't function, helpless folks being tasered to death, crime wave, foreclosures, food shortages. It kind of helps folks understand what it's like to be "down" and have things going on beyond your control. Maybe...some empathy for our fellow human beings will start to emerge after the decades of "Greed is Good."

We have to hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Preening Fop Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. Our Leader, George the Ghoul.
:nuke: :hide: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. Congress cannot investigate because...
then there would have to be a prosecution. That would divide the country. Can't have that. Wouldn't be prudent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
32. The question isn't whether Bush is guilty or not; it's -What are the Dems gonna do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. Time to put Pelosi on notice. Begin Impeachment or be charged as an accessory after the fact.
Nancy Pelosi's tacit approval of the Bush Adminstrations war crimes can no longer be tollerated. It's time to back her into a corner and give her the choice of putting the Bush administration on trial or standing trial with them. Will not allow this to swept under a rug like good lil Nazi's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peanut Butter Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. The Repukes Laugh at us and
Point out that nothing will be done about it.

They are a sick demented portion of our society that should be exposed
whenever and however possible. They should be forced to crawl back into
the slimey gutters and be ashamed to show their faces in public.

But instead they mock us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJLP1580 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. a Democratic majority?
Isn't there a Democratic majority in both the Senate and the House? How exactly are the "repukes" mocking you? If they have ground for impeachment, wouldn't the Democratic majority get that process started?

"They are a sick demented portion of our society that should be exposed whenever and however possible. They should be forced to crawl back into the slimey gutters and be ashamed to show their faces in public."

Adolf? Is that you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. And this is precisely why "Three Iranian Speedboats Harrass US Ship in Persian Gulf" - more


"newsworthy" and oh-so-conveniently-timed so as to keep the sheeple focussed on Dick & George's Next Big Adventure instead of the fact that the man sitting in the Oval Office signed off on TORTURE.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJLP1580 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Hmmm...
You don't think there's any credibility to that story? Who are "sheeple"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Actually, no; I do not. I think its timing is extraordinarily suspect.


In answer to your second question, remember the chants of "Four More Years" -- the ones that had such a similar rhythm to "Two Legs Bad, Four Legs Good" ?

Welcome to DU :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJLP1580 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Thanks for the welcome...
And I understand what you're saying...that quote is from Animal Farm, right?

I understand not wanting to be fooled by lies...but haven't we seen terrorist attacks that have been planned according to political elections, like in Madrid? The terrorists know what they're doing. They commit crimes right before elections to try and sway voters. It's worked before.

If you don't believe anything the administration says, because you think that they lack credibility, well, I can't argue much with you on that front. But I think it may be unwise to think false every bit of news involving threats to our nation.

There ARE people out there that wish to destroy our country and its people...we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. No Surprise w/him--he's the Decider and the Torturer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. It's true. If you get inside the brain of some people setting a priority or
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 02:00 PM by higher class
condoning acts - some place private sex acts and their condemnation above and more serious than condemning killing, torturing, maiming, ruining familes, ruining livlihoods, making children parentless, creating exiles, pillaging, plundering, lying for profit and ynaking people off the street and subjecting them to extreme torment for the purpose of fishing for information. They also place private sex condemnation over breaking treaties and tossing agreements and the rewriting of the constitution by corporations. Shall we add controlling the news and investigations?.

And we have elected leaders who facilitate it. Ad lobbyists who set it all up.

That's democracy in this country. That's not haveing your head on straight so your brain gets reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Chairman Conyers, isn't THIS what you've been waiting for? The "Smoking Gun"?
And Madame Speaker -- set the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman74 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yes, Impeachment is the best, but they're not going to do it. So...
can't the Congressional Democrats at least CENSURE BUSH??? For Chrissakes!!!! Someone should ask Senator Diane Feinstein about censuring Bush. After all, she (and others) censured Bill Clinton for nothing!!

What I can only dream of would be: Impeachment, Indictment (at the International Court of Justice as well as U.S. courts), Incarceration (at where else but Guantanamo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
52. i wonder what goes thru nancy pelosi's mind when she reads this
she has enabled this by her non-action imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC