Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hmmm, I've heard 2 explainations for grounding AA's fleet.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:25 AM
Original message
Hmmm, I've heard 2 explainations for grounding AA's fleet.
First, I heard that Shrub appointed a buddy as Sec. of Transportation, and another buddy to head the FAA. Those guys don't like regulating business, so they changed the Dept. from one of enforcement to one of "compliance assistance". A "now be good guys" attitude has been operating for 7 years. They got spooked by the problem with Southwest and THEIR noncompliance in checking and fixing the tail rudder problems a few weeks ago, so they decided they bette4r clamp down on everybody NOW!

Second, the FAA began checking compliance with ADs (airworthiness Directives) and found a problem with the bundled wires in the wheelwells of the MD80's. The AD requires the wire bundle be tied with wireties every 1", but at AA they were tied every 1 1/4" so that considered noncompiance and 60 planes were grounded and the airline instructed to FIX IT! When the FAA came back to reinspect that 60 planes, they found that the clamp had been installed backwards AND that the sheathing was the wrong sheathing. THAT was when they grounded the fleet.


The first explaination I heard on the radio this AM, and the second explaination I just saw on CNN along with showing one of the wore bundles. I'll try to find a link.

I actually believe BOTH stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. In the current climate they had to ground the fleet
Were there to be an incident on one of those planes not matter *how* unrelated to what they knew was 'wrong' (or really is wrong depending on the story) that would be it for an otherwise struggling airline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm just glad I have no reasons to fly anymore
I just hope we survive bushco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. We have made it this far well get trough it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think so too
this country is much stronger than a cabal of traitorous bastages

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I would love to be that optimistic.
Unfortunately I am not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You're right of course. My guess is that the maintenance crews
at ALL AIRLINES have been scrambelling big time over the last week or so to make SURE the FAA doesn't find anything when it becomes THEIR TURN!

The problems with the wire bundles really WASN'T a safety problem, but I can tell you, my son has been an A&P mech for 18 years, and the airlines USED TO KNOW how pickey the FAA inspectors were on EVERYTHING, and AFIK the only things the airline he works for was ever cited for was some signoffs missing from paperowrk, and even then, the offending employee was dicliplined. I haven't heard anything aboutsurprise inspections which is why I believe the first report I heard. I'll have to ask my son if he noticed a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Of course the FAA was compromised by Bush's political appointees, just like every other fed agency.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I used to do inspection for USACE up in the NE
and I was a major PITA because every time I signed off on something if years down the line it failed it was *my* responsibility. I once asked a contractor so rip out a good weeks worth of work because of one relatively minor variance but the risk of a failure was allot..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If my son is an example, that same sense of responsibility still
exists today, from the sighn off by the mech all the way through final insp.

I had a good friend who had a great supervisory job with Eastern. He QUIT because his superiors were demanding that the plane had to fly to make $$, so if a backup systerm wasn't working "Don't worry about it. The primary one is fine!" As we all know, Eastern didn't survive. I can't say that EVERY mech & Insp. does a 100% job ALL THE TIME, but by far, the vast majority do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not Bill Clinton's fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Give 'em a minute, willya?
Geez, can't come up with a reason all in a second, you know. It'll be Clinton's fault soon enough, if not Bill's then surely Hillary's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. 1st one - conspiracy theory. 2nd one - half truth.
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 01:52 PM by EOO
Read this:




The American Airlines pilot says the plane's nose gear would not retract and he quickly began circling the Minnesota airport. But freezing temperatures and icy precipitation started to create problems inside the plane, Mayer says.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/04/08/griffin.landing.gear/index.html


A similar incident happened in Palm Beach Airport (PBI) a couple months ago, requiring the pilots to make an emergency landing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC