Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 07:46 PM
Original message |
|
This comes up every now and again.
The biggest opposition argument I hear is that we wouldn't have stalwarts like Ted Kennedy. The counter argument is that we wouldn't be burdened by fuckwads like Arelen Spector and John McCain.
On balance, I think it would be a good thing. I'll suffer from a lack of Teddy in favor of having citizen-legislators instead of ossified careerists in it for the power, glory, perks, and self-aggrandizement.
I want representatives in Congress, not careerists to whom I don't matter.
|
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm against them, except for President. |
|
It worked well with FDR, and frankly, Bill Clinton would have likely won a third term if he could have run, but on the flip side, Reagan might have stayed president until he died.
However, we've had some good representation from long-term Senators. Carl Levin, for example. And would you want Barbara Boxer termed out?
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Do you honestly think career politicians care about you? |
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, I think some do. Patty Murray does, I think. |
|
And I think Carl Levin does too.
I think Paul Wellstone did. I think Russ Feingold does.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. I think you can probably name 10 or 20 who are there to serve the people .... the rest of them ..... |
|
...... not so much. Some clearly better than others, but all of them art of the club.
I want the club broken up.
|
SteinbachMB
(304 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Iris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. take a way the cynicism and you could call it career public servants |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 08:31 PM by Iris
I know, I know - too idealistic, but it would be nice if our leaders weren't beholden to lobbyists and special interests and could gain knowledge and experience that could be a career in serving the people.
|
Fovea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Term limits guarantee that the only ones who know how to make the system work are the lobbyists.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Fovea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
18. The lobbyists are opportunistic parasites |
|
who control the system in the Missouri statehouse because they have more institutional knowledge than legislators.
I agree about lobbyists. I don't think I support term limits. But I do support total public campaign financing.
That takes the grease out of the corrupt machine.
|
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Well, the voters are the ones keeping them in... |
|
and I'm okay with that.
Personally, I think a president should be able to have three terms rather than just the two. I sometimes wonder what sort of world we would live in had Bill Clinton gotten a third term.
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Prison Terms. Get the criminals out of circulation.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. 1 out of 100. Yeah! Build that economy! Siss boom bagh! |
|
:sarcasm: Judicial discretion yes! Term limits on prison terms no! Term limits for politicians yes! Term limits Judges no!
|
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-11-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
On balance I think it's a good thing.
Someone like Ted Kennedy can find other places to serve the people if he wants to. He can be in the House, Senate, Governor, head of a NGO, and a forward-looking businessman.
Ninety year old relics like Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd can retire.
|
Holly_Hobby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Other gov't workers are forced to retire at 65 n/t |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
14. we really have little if any true representation...the lobbyists own congress |
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
15. The trouble with term limits is that staffers would be there forever anyway |
|
Any you might be surprised how many bills are written by staffers and never even read by the bill's sponsor...
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We have term limits here in California, and it hasn't helped a damned thing. It's just a big game of musical chairs, while the staffers and lobbyists stay in the same place and wield the power elected officials have lost.
We have term limits - they're called elections.
|
LeftishBrit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I live in a country with no term limits for anyone. I think that term limits for top leaders are a good idea, and wish we had them here. Both Thatcher and Blair stayed too long, and became like little elected dictators.
I would not recommend term limits for MPs/members of Congress, however. I suspect this would simply lead to their keeping a 'day job' and neglecting their duties to their constituents.
|
Fireweed247
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
or can we at least thrown them in prison for enabling war criminals? At the very least they should be thrown out of office for not upholding the Constitution, their sworn duty. We have elections, but who does the counting? www.peacecandidates.com
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |