greenbriar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:37 PM
Original message |
This question is for Repukes...what makes McNasty wrong in 2000 but right in 2008? |
|
McNasty was vilified in 2000 and we got (shudder)bush...so why 8 years later is he suddenly okay now???
McNasty WRONG ALL THE TIME is more like it
but just askin
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Because Poppy wanted his legacy to continue in dimson. McSame |
|
would have to wait his turn...
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I believe it's pretty pathetic when McCain is all they've got - Obama will bring him to tears once |
|
they're finally paired against each other, McCain can't remember shit!!!
|
greenbriar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I can't wait to see McNasty lose it in public and really show his temper |
|
utube will be all over that
|
bunkerbuster1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because he's not a c*nt or a n*gger |
|
And that's good enough for us Reee-publicans!
|
bluedawg12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
5. BushCain can't run so McBush is running n/t |
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. "George W." as a former coworker called him, was supposed to |
|
be the savior of the GOP. He was the anointed one. McInsane was an upstart who threatened the Boy King. It wasn't HIS "turn." Now that King George II has had his 8 year massacre of the United States, the gracious GOP will allow McCain his turn, just as they did Bob Dole in '96. Neither has a chance in hell of winning, so they will "allow" the Democrats to win one and take the blame for the fuck up of George W. Then when their right wing media has whipped the country into a frenzy again, they'll present another "anointed one" to be the savior of their party.
|
greenbriar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I hope we take control and don't let go for 42 years |
|
it will take that long to right this country that bush has so screwed up
|
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Our party should have fought harder for Gore and/or Kerry |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 10:09 PM by classicfilmfan
In 2000 too many *powerful* Democrats were willing to step aside and let the Republicans have a "turn". The United States of America is not a swingset. It's not about taking "turns". Nominations should be based on who the people want, and who is best to lead the country. Not because it's the "turn" of some white haired asshole who's been in Congress for 20 years! The problem is no matter which party is in power, most of the big shots are set. Some of our people care about what happens to the country, but not enough to make sure it won't happen again.
Edited to include the last two sentences.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-12-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message |