The Peter muses about his failure to destroy The Homosexual Agenda

[JackBeck]

by: pam
Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 17:00:00 PM EDT

Read as LaBarbera thinks aloud about how his movement needs to regroup for the battle ahead to curtail the success of The Homosexual Agenda.

ith each passing year, the other side CELEBRATES homosexual and gender-confused lifestyles with ever greater fervor, and happily promotes the same to kids, as if they are doing God's work (when it is actually Satan's). Their play book is simple: always stay on the offensive, even when it comes to advocating "transgender" identity/behavior to children (e.g., the 2nd-grade Colorado boy who was encouraged to come to school in a dress). We moral-minded express the requisite shock and horror; they continue to move forward.

Tell me: which side is destined to win the Culture War according to these lopsided Rules of Engagement?

In the public policy arena, many on "our side" have already conceded "civil unions," at least in blue states (the California Marriage Amendment that may get on the ballot expressly allows "civil unions"). Most GOP politicians are reluctant to even discuss homosexuality at all, which only emboldens the Democrats to be more pro-homosexual-agenda. You cannot win a debate if you are afraid to discuss the main issue - homosexuality. That's like being pro-life but refusing to discuss the humanity of the unborn baby! (Please note the parallels: there was a time when the opinion polls favored pro-abortion feminists; now they favor pro-lifers - defeat is NOT inevitable, and Truth is more important than polls.)

The whining continues below the fold.
pam :: The Peter muses about his failure to destroy The Homosexual Agenda

How strange: when the Homosexual Lobby is at the zenith of its power, some Christian leaders are calling for a retreat and scolding the "Religious Right," which at least has tried to slow down the homosexual activist juggernaut. Whoever said Christians are called to surrender in the battle of good versus evil?
We must reject such defeatism and get back to the basics of why we are in this fight - explaining, in Christian love in line with Biblical truth:

* WHY homosexual behavior is always wrong, and often dangerous;
* WHY homosexual relationships - even those rare long-term, truly monogamous ones - are immoral, disordered, against God, and harmful to children ("gay adoption");
* WHY it is public-policy madness to grant civil rights status based on changeable sexual behavior and gender identity disorders;
* WHY corporations should get out of the business of promoting ALL extra-marital relationships;
* WHY homosexualism is not "gay" but destructive to children; and
* HOW "sexual orientation" laws are fundamentally incompatible with religious and moral freedom.

And of course: how no man or woman - or teenager - has to be "gay" (positively homosexual): that's a lifestyle choice which can be overcome with God's help; see Stephen Black's wonderful testimony HERE.

We at AFTAH, or the other pro-family organizations, don't have all the answers - that's for sure. So please let me hear your thoughts on how our movement can regain the offensive in the ongoing battle against homosexualism. Write [e-mail]. Thank you and God bless.

I really don't have any suggestions for you, Peter, because LGBTs can still be fired for being gay, cannot adopt in some states, cannot marry in most states, and regularly are the victim of hate crimes. That hardly sounds like a slam dunk win over the professional "Christian" set.

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5037

Will this guy ever go away? I realize that fundraising has been down for many years, but once he's gone, will another take his place? I swear their obsession has to be certifiable.

[Ellen Forradalom]

1. Two words: CLOSET CASE

Dollars to doughnuts he gets picked up in a vice dragnet.

[JackBeck]

5. I have to disagree.

That's like saying racists are closeted people of color.

[readmoreoften]

7. Yes, it's blaming the victim. Gay people are only harmed by other gay people.

It's all just some terrible internecine warfare between good gays and bad gays that's no business of straight people--defined as innately moral and 'natural' and good, and therefore wise, forgiving, and self-assured...

[Ellen Forradalom]

12. Interesting analogy

Homophobes come in many stripes.

Some homophobes are ignorant, some feel threatened, and some are deeply disturbed by their own buried desires.

I gotta wonder, though, about the most obsessed of them.

[JackBeck]

13. I find it odd that no one ever explores the spectrum of identities

when it comes to racists, homophobes, xenophobes, et al.

Yet when it comes to homophobes, without a moment's thought, they're immediately a closet case.

I've watched documentaries on White Power and the KKK that interviewed Black members of those movements.

Yet, I have not once seen an immediate assumption that a racist was Black on DU.

I'm curious as to why there exists the double standard.

[Ellen Forradalom]

14. I don't see it as a double standard

Not a small number of these guys have, in fact, are projecting in a desperate bid to bury their desires. It doesn't explain all of them, but they do have a way of getting unmasked on a regular basis.

But it's an interesting point you raise. Self-loathing occurs amongst all oppressed populations. It just so happens that it's hard to be a closeted Black in the KKK.

[msongs]

2. jesus says divorce=adultery yet christians love divorce. many do it multiple times nt

[JackBeck]

3. A word I heard used for these types that I totally dig:

"Theosexuals".

:rofl:

And you're spot on in pointing out the depths of their hypocrisy.

[alfredo]

4. The homosexual agenda

[Ishoutandscream2]

6. Brilliant!!!

:applause: :applause: :applause:

[readmoreoften]

8. I rec that!

:bounce:

[JackBeck]

9. And there we have it.

:thumbsup:

[alfredo]

11. That needs to be a poster. I'm sure someone with the skills can do it.

[and-justice-for-all]

10. Because there is no Gay Agenda....nt