Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Did God create woman from one of man's ribs"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:19 PM
Original message
"Did God create woman from one of man's ribs"?
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 08:21 PM by panader0
Didn't Eve eat that apple after she was tempted by that big snake? This Compassion thing is BS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lost-in-nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO Adam was a weak
man



he knew what he was doing when he created woman


because he created "man"

realized he made a mistake

so ladies that is why

we are here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

strong!!!!


lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldleftguy Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Short Ribs -- Yum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. WHy did the Dems even agree to this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. because they are pandering for the sanctimonious, brain-washed vote
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 08:35 PM by Skittles
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A "faith in politics" forum should be real quick.
Only long enough to say, their is no faith in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Ta-da -- nailed it in one sentence! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. Because these days, you just can't thump the Jeezus-Tub hard too hard or too often . . .
Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative, unless you're washed in the Whitewash of the Lord and do your darndest to pander to the Tim LaHaye-reading raptard, you haven't an electoral prayer.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Your "Jeezus-Tub" reminded me of this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Religion and politcs. Bah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Religion. Bah.
Superstitious louts and cynical charletons have plagued us and held us back for our entire existance as a species.

When will we "grow up"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
44. Oh, yeah. Agree totally!
I'm sick of all the superstition and silliness in the 21st century! No way should crazy whackos be allowed to dictate the terms to the rest of us--and yet, every time someone screams fire and brimstone, the power base either panders, or cowers in a corner.

Atheist is the new black. Seriously, you can even be gay and get more acceptance than if you tell people you don't believe in their mythology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Not really. When did religion start? What function allowed the evolution of religion
in a Darwinian context? My best guess is enslavement.
Brain-washing slaves keeps down the costs of subjugation.

After we can just get rid of that function, the brain-washing can stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
56. Fundamentalist religions. bah
I understand people's need to try and figure out why they are here, why we can think, look at what is morally right, but fundamentalist religions get a big bah from me as they are the problem. Fundamentalism, not just religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. That question was asked too???
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do rabbit's have little cloven feet?
Better pull those "sanitary napkin" commercials as well, what with women being unclean and all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Look at the conduct of all the male players
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 08:43 PM by Warpy
Eve was never directly told not to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, she had to get it second hand from Adam.

God lied. He said they'd die if they ate the fruit but they lived and apparently saw through god, who'd been keeping them ignorant and using them like pets or zoo animals in an artificial habitat.

The serpent told Eve the truth, that the fruit would give her knowledge and she'd live through the experience. It did and she did.

God didn't get pissed off until Adam ate the fruit, and then it was all over. God threw a hissy fit and Adam blamed Eve for his choice to eat the fruit. Honestly, he was a weak man who had to wait until a woman took the initial risk before he'd bother testing the waters. No wonder Lilith had taken one look at him and left Eden rather than be tied to such a wimp.

As for Eve being made from one of Adam's ribs, it must've grown back because men aren't missing any of them.

Personally, given the choice between ignorance and knowledge, I'll always choose the latter. Given the choice between comfortable captivity and risky freedom, I'll always choose the latter. No matter how comfortable a cage is, it's still a cage.

I find a great deal of sympathy for both Lilith and Eve and a certain respect for the serpent who told them the truth. The other males in the story weren't heroes, not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. by the way
Why did he need a rib to make Eve? He made Adam from mud or something.

I'm thinking maybe those old rabbis that wrote that story were ribbing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Huh?
"He said they'd die if they ate the fruit" - Are they still alive?

"As for Eve being made from one of Adam's ribs, it must've grown back because men aren't missing any of them." - My father had his appendix taken out, odly enough I was born with one..

--

Neither Adam nor Eve were 'heroes' of that story on that we can agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
36. Shirley you jest...
So, was the phallic anthropomorphic animal the hero?

Or the imaginary "patriarch"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes. Man was the prototype
And like a good engineer God eliminated all the glitches and rolled out WoMan, or Man 2.0. Isn't it obvious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. You're kidding! They asked that? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Bible has 2 versions of how God created women...

Genesis 1:27
(God makes both man and woman at the same time)

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Genesis 2:21-22
(The famous rib story)

And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

Most Christians really aren't familiar with the Bible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm always telling people there are 2 versions in the Bible, and
they have no idea. I do find it quite interesting that it is the rib version that is the one that has consistently been told, that has been taught to us as children. Gee, I wonder how that happened? Could it be because men were the ones in leadership positions in churches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. This is not a contradiction
Most theologians recognise 1:27 as an 'abstract' of the process..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. It's all abstract. 'Adam and Eve' are a primordial creation mythology
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 01:22 AM by Hissyspit
from people who could never have had the opportunity to grasp evolution.

Chicken or Egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Actually, the garden of eden and the knowledge of good and evil
both strike me as fairly astute metaphors for evolution. Evolving hominids left the primordial forest around the same time they became self-aware (that is, aware of their own individuality and mortality.)

Really, it is an incredibly astute metaphor, all religious connotation aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Sorry, it's "turtles all the way down".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Or maybe it's all a crock
How bout them apples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. The sequence described in the 2 versions still contradict each other.
Some may rationalize it any way they like.

Beasts before man:

GEN 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
GEN 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Man before beasts:

GEN 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
GEN 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. What a copout!
My sister used to say that whenever she had backed a religious nut into a corner with unassailable facts and logic, the ultimate defense was always, "That's one of God's mysteries." Gee, with a fallback position like that you will never lose an argument!

This "abstract" business is a ploy to avoid acknowledging an obvious contradiction in the Holy Infallible Received Word Of God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. Right the way that semitc people wrote accoutns is a cop out..
Not the way English speakers read them right?

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2194

First, careful analysis reveals that there is deliberate purpose in the individuality of these two sections of Scripture. In Genesis 1 there is a broad outline of the events of the creation week, which reaches its climax with the origin of mankind in the very image of God. In Genesis 2 there is the special emphasis upon man, the divine preparation of his home, the formation of a suitable mate, etc. Edward J. Young has a good statement of this matter:

There are different emphases in the two chapters...but the reason for these is obvious. Chapter 1 continues the narrative of creation until the climax, namely, man made in the image and likeness of God. To prepare the way for the account of the fall, chapter 2 gives certain added details about man’s original condition, which would have been incongruous and out of place in the grand, declarative march of chapter 1 (1960, p. 53).

This type of procedure was not unknown in the literary methodology of antiquity. Gleason Archer observed that the “technique of recapitulation was widely practiced in ancient Semitic literature. The author would first introduce his account with a short statement summarizing the whole transaction, and then he would follow it up with a more detailed and circumstantial account when dealing with matters of special importance” (1964, p. 118). These respective sections have a different literary motif. Genesis 1 is chronological, revealing the sequential events of the creation week, whereas Genesis 2 is topical, with special concern for man and his environment.

Second, there is clear evidence that Genesis 2 was never an independent creation account. There are simply too many crucial elements missing for that to have been the case. For instance, there is no mention in Genesis 2 of the creation of the Earth, and there is no reference to the oceans or fish. There is no allusion to the Sun, Moon, and stars, etc. Archer has pointed out that there is not an origins record in the entire literature collection of the ancient Near East that omits discussing the creation of the Sun, Moon, seas, etc. (1982, p. 69). Obviously, Genesis 2 is a sequel to chapter 1. The latter presupposes the former and is built upon it.

--

Your sister need to look into Christian apologetics to support her faith, God does not want us to close our eyes to hard questions and while he is indeed a God of mysteries that does not mean we should not ask.

Semetic writes *often* would outline the entire event and then give specifics about details within.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
38. Also, there are two Noah stories....
and different accounts of how many animals to put on the ark...

Genesis 6:

19) And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee, they shall be male and female{/B]




Genesis 7:

2)Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of the beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
3) Of fouls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive on the face of the earth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. It's a literal contradiction.
Most scientists recognize it as all a bunch of nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. It most certainly not a literal contradiction
It was a *very* common way that people in the world wrote at that time. Hell some people still write like that today. Step out of the shoes of a 20th century English speaker for a moment wont you..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. You’re Right; It's Not A Literal Contradiction.
They just decided to leave Lilith out.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Right . . . you have to know the story of LILITH - Adam's first wife . . .
in order to understand this . . .

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Lilith was an uppity woman according to Adam ---
especially because she knew she had been created "EQUALLY" ---
And, if you want to know where vile propaganda begins its with the Bible --

They demonized Lilith --- you have to research very deeply to find that she became a friend to Eve
and tried to help Eve in her complaints about Adam ---

Of course, this is simply theater --- one of dozens of storis told to try to guide people --
Unfortunately, this one was WRITTEN down for the 3% of the population which could read --- i.e.,
religous scholars.

The Bible was written to try to cement the patriarchy ---
The patriarchy is one of the most suicidal ideas men have ever had --- as we can see right now!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. "The patriarchy is one of the most suicidal ideas men have ever had --- as we can see right now!"
Agreed on that. In the choke hold death's grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
41. Hebrew legend says Lilith didn't like the missonary position...
According to Jewish legend she didn't like the "man on top" sex that he insisted on, so she took a hike.

After God created Adam, who was alone, He said, 'It is not good for man to be alone.' He then created a woman for Adam, from the earth, as He had created Adam himself, and called her Lilith. Adam and Lilith immediately began to fight. She said, 'I will not lie below,' and he said, 'I will not lie beneath you, but only on top. For you are fit only to be in the bottom position, while I am to be the superior one.' Lilith responded, 'We are equal to each other inasmuch as we were both created from the earth.' But they would not listen to one another. When Lilith saw this, she pronounced the Ineffable Name and flew away into the air.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. Never heard that one . . .
So Adam had no imagination, eh?

The Bibical farce continues on and on ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Most Christian fundamentalists will call the story a myth...
However, many people, including some regular Christians will call the Adam and Eve story a myth.

Myths are the smoke of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
46. Right, and I'm amazed by how many people ignore the first verse
because we're left with some pretty icky incest after Adam and Eve left Eden unless the rest of us were already here.

Of course, that's again leaves us with a god that created a couple of spare humans to keep as experimental animals in a special cage, just to see what they'd do under controlled conditions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. You've forgotten the "angels" who seem to be aliens . . . ????
"Guards of the universe" . . . ???

The Vatican has no problem with this concept of "aliens" interbreeding with the people of the earth!

Strange truths in weird places --- !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. That explains the old men who priss around in dresses
and funny hats, but what about all of us normal folks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #53
61. Dude, don't even get me STARTED on the subject of the NEPHALIM! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hell no, she was made from a fish
and don't get me started on the fish jokes and tartar sauce.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. There are people out there that believe men all STILL have one less rib than a woman,
Honest to...well, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Wouldn't that make guys a little lopsided?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. People who believe these Bible stories have the minds of
four year old children. Around the age of five most children no longer believe in santa, the tooth fairy
or the easter bunny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. The stories can be useful if seen as "stories."
But an adult, for example, believing that Noah's Flood created the Grand Canyon is just as ridiculous as a belief in a literal Paul Bunyan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. Now wait a minute: HANDS OFF THE EASTER BUNNY!
I need my chocolate fix and during the spring, I can always say "The Bunny made me do it." You take away that excuse and I'll be bombarded with Jenny Craig spam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
28. You're kidding me. That was an actual debate question?
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:41 AM by seawolf
Christ al-bloody-mighty, haven't these idiots heard of a little thing called "separation of church and state?"

Anything like that crops up in later debates oughta be answered with: "That's a creation myth. It may be a little less exciting than one of the Egyptian creation myths, which involved a deity called Atum who had too much time on his hands...well, hand...but it's the same sort of myth. Myth. As in "A STORY!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. No, Eve won Adam over by barbecuing ribs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
45. Well, sure he did. I have it on good authority
The Great Pumpkin came to me in a dream and confirmed it.
How much more authoritative can you get than THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
47. I'd be tempted by the "big snake" too if I were Eve.
:rofl:
Does this mean that Eve made the move on Adam? Eve was horny, and Adam just went along with it, huh. So Eve is the one who is punished.

Disclaimer: I'm an agnostic, and I have not spent a lot of time analyzing the Bible, so that is my amateurish first impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. Um.. about that snake..
The snake was in Adam's pants.. & she was too embarrassed to tell the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. I like your post better than mine.
It's snappy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
51. Subject: Obeying God's Voice = Just got this e-mail, in case there is a believer out there:
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 01:08 PM by L. Coyote
Subject: Obeying God's Voice
X-WEBC-Mail-Request-IP: 80.89.179.107
X-WEBC-Mail-From-Script: http://www.elforastero.com/LaTierra/Europa/Portugal/manla.php
From: "Ruth David" <ruth_david71@yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <20080414174800.327A435047@eu1395f.lyceu.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:48:00 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Length: 846


Dear Beloved,

Greetings!! I am Mrs. Ruth David, a widow of 73years, suffering from cancer of the breast, my
husband and my only son were killed last year during the UK terrorist attack when we visited London
for holidays.

My condition is serious and according to my doctor, it is obvious that I might not survive. I have
some funds that my late husband WILLED to me in cash; the sum of $5,900,000.00 United States of
American Dollars. I packaged it inconsignments and deposited it with a finance house.

After my prayers, I searched a Christian site in the internet, I found your email address and I
decided to contact you for the usage of the funds in your Ministry.

Therefore, if you are honest and faithful enough to use this fund strictly for the work, your
response will be highly appreciated.

Yours sincerely,
Mrs. Ruth David.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
55. God created Eve from Adam's rib and Eve ate the apple and took a shit
in the Garden of Eden. And where her droppings hit the earth, a Bush sprouted. That was the beginning of the Bush family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. hmm, which is more "perfect": xx or xy?
to heck w/mythology....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. These stories in the Bible are just that
Stories. It is known that the story of the garden of Eden and the Great Flood are based on Mesopotamian stone tablets that are 1,000 years older than the Bible. The garden and flood stories are also in other religions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. The first sex is female.
All fetuses are female, and stay that way, unless the testes of the male fetus produce testosterone at a certain point in fetal development.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
63. It was sheer magic powers!! ~~ *poof*




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC