Explaining Lieberman’s Web Crash

[EV_Ares]

By THOMAS KAPLAN
Published: April 10, 2008
NEW HAVEN — It seemed to be the ultimate political dirty trick of the digital age: crashing an opponent’s Web site on the eve of a primary election in order to disrupt an opponent’s last-minute efforts. Or so the campaign of Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut charged in 2006 when its site crashed the day before the upset victory of the challenger, Ned Lamont, in the Democratic primary.

Mr. Lieberman still went on to win re-election in November as an independent. Then, in December 2006, the state attorney general and the United States attorney, in response to a Lieberman request for an investigation, reported that they had found no evidence of foul play.

Now an F.B.I. e-mail message from October 2006 has been disclosed, saying that its investigation — also in response to a request by the Lieberman camp — showed that it was not angry bloggers or Mr. Lamont’s insurgent campaign workers who rendered the site inaccessible, but sheer technological ineptitude.


rest of the article @ the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/nyregion/10crash.html...

[TheUniverse]

1. I have no clue why he felt the need to do such a dirty trick.

If I remember correctly before the election, he was pulling well ahead of Lamont and he ended up beating him by double digits. When your seat is that safe, why risk getting caught doing something stupid like this?