Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone is Betting on a Recession...Guess Who?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:06 PM
Original message
Someone is Betting on a Recession...Guess Who?
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 08:09 PM by Stuart G
Who bets day after day?
..Legalized gambling on an grand scale....
....Wall Street...
......Billions of dollars in a day........
........Hundreds of billions of dollars......
.......... Wall Street is betting on a deep recession......

.......Oh come on you will say...how do you know?

...Well, one stock sells cheap stuff, everyday stuff. Stuff people need to live on. And they sell it cheaper than anyone else..
...Not a particularly well liked company indeed. People hate it here, and everywhere..but guess what?

This stock has gone up 25 percent in the last 6 months? small retail outfit...Wallmart.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=WMT&t=6m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Walmart isn't a bet, its a LOCK
They were pretty much the only national retailer, to finish ABOVE expectations over Christmas. They're also experiencing amazing international growth. Recession or not, if someone didn't care about politics and just wanted to invest in a sure thing, Walmart is a pretty good company to put your money into. That's just reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You are right...but.
I put this up here to show that professional gamblers, those that must win, if at all possible, are betting on this one. Mutual funds that show growth in stock value must improve....
..These assholes, the assholes of the assholes, will pile on each other as long as there is money to be made. That is the point. These assholes think there will be money made here. Fuck everyone else. Then get out...

...So who are the assholes betting on....It ain't the home industry, or banking...who gives a shit about them....
...It is the guy who sells everyday stuff the cheapest.
..........Like the gambler says...readem and weep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I have a mixed reaction to your post....
I understand your thesis, but keep in mind that there are millions upon millions upon millions of everyday Americans, good people, who are invested heavily into 401k and IRA accounts. Those account managers have the lives of millions of people in their hands. They're expected to diversify investment. It's not surprising to me that they'd put their money into a winner. It's not like Walmart is some new phenomenon. They've shown steady growth every year for like, well, since they were created decades ago.

Then come the politics, the negative impacts on community, the poor treatment of employees, etc. But the fact is, no matter how bad they are presumed to be, more people go to shop at Walmarts across the country every single year. Why? Cheap prices, quick service on the way in and on the way out. Simple as that.

But how has Walmart done it? Simple. They were making deals with the Chinese back when Bush 1 was in office. Why do you think the Walmart stores in China don't pay taxes. Because half the fucking countryside is employed because of Walmart, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Shane, You tell me, what can we do?
Till the government owns the means of production, or the means of distribution, things ain't going to change..

Not cause I may or may not like it, cause the government just.. ain't going to take over....
...A. Means of Production
...B. Means of Distribution
...C. Distribute the profits to all people...

That way it might be fair.....
..I recall that it don't work....
...Someone tried it, and didn't like it...for years they tried it...killed millions for the idea...it sucked too.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I completely disagree with you about government control
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 09:07 PM by ShaneGR
Look, we are a free market society. We have always been a free market society. Massive corporations have influenced America since its inception, whether they were called coporations or not. You think Washington lived in Mount Vernon by accident?

Do you really think it would be a good thing for the government to control Walmart? Ok, lets say the President who was a liberal moderate, fair minded, business savvy, and connected was running these government controlled corporations, that might be to your liking. But what about when the President or Congress is of a political persuasion you don't like. What then? Now you're screwed. I guarantee you someone like GWB could make the unthinkable happen, bankrupt Walmart. Meanwhile government control in our system creates weakness because every 2 years the entire system is under jeapordy from new elected officials. And if everything is government controlled, then the corporate jobs become political jobs not based on experience (for reference look up communist party of former soviet union or administration of George W Bush for political lackies getting undeserved positions of power.)

My overall take is that yes, the GWB years have been a complete disaster. Yes, we're in deep shit. But no, the economic system isnt going to end as we know it. We'll take our hits, people will suffer, but in the end we WILL overcome this time because, well, that's what this country has always done.

America..... FUCK YA!!!!

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with your logic, but have heard right here that wal*mart;
is not doing well. Had a conversation with an out of town friend who told me he had been to wal*mart and the food end and the drug end had business, but the departments in between were empty. Things may be cheap, but when your filling the tanks on that 35K hemi, there ain't much left for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5.  Sure there aint much left. ...of course...
So, where are you going to buy your Cheerios?
....Big Foodstore at $4.50
....Wall Mart.....at $3.25

It is a crappy argument for a crappy store. but...
..save a buck and a quarter a few times, and you got a gallon of gas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uh, look at the five year chart.
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/w/wmt

It all depends on which time period you look at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, of course...
Looking at it for five years,,well Wall Mart Sucks..yes..
...But the assholes of Wall Street don't look for 5 years..When things start to get better, (who knows when that will be?) out of that investment back to housing or banking, or whatever...
.......when that shit is low.... the assholes will buy when most won't,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wal-Mart is basically dead money and has been for ten years.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 08:50 PM by A HERETIC I AM


A $.96/share dividend on a $55 stock is crap, (yield 1.75%) regardless if they are up 25% in the last 6 months. Particularly since WMT has been trading between $40 & $60 since 2000.

Edited to correct dividend from the quarterly figure to the annual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9.  I am not so sure...How about this...look during 90-93 recesson..
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 08:41 PM by Stuart G
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=WMT&t=my&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=


I don't know how to bring up charts...sorry...

and if you read the link, it had fantastic growth during the 90-93period of the last deep recession...charts can prove anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Exactly. If you bought it at $5 or $10 or even $20 you did fine, but
all the gas is gone from that stock.

I edited my post above. The $.24/share dividend is the quarterly (that's what Marketwatch quotes, not the annual). The Annual is $.96 but it still in only a 1.75% yield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't see loss there... dead money is a loser....
I see steady growth over time, especially in most retirement accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. If you like a 1.75% yield then you're all set.
It's a blue chip. It is a member of the Dow 30. It isn't going away and it has a decent credit rating, debt ratio and it's profitable. I didn't say it was a loser, I said it was dead money.

But it sure as hell isn't a growth stock. It was a growth issue in 1990.

There are plenty of other issues in the retail sleeve that beat the pants off Wal-Mart on total return.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. They're called Blue Chips
Because they're safe in a portfolio, and with matching funds from employer or interest bearing, they are a stable presence of growth over the longterm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks for the tip.
As I said, "it's a blue chip".

Value stocks most certainly have a place in a well diversified portfolio.

It is my opinion that there are better ones out there than WMT, that's all. And since it's in the Consumer Staples Sector, there are quite a few better ones.

And BTW, anyone getting shares of WMT "with matching funds from employer" are getting them inside a Mutual Fund or they work for Wal-Mart. A 401(K) plan that allows the purchase of individual issues would be extremely rare.

A Simple IRA, sure. As long as the custodian allows it.
A 401(K)? Not bloody likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. In the long run, who really decides..If the thing is worth anything?
All of us in this here world...If they can keep selling the stuff cheap, and people will go there...then....
..that and only that will determine the price and the value...

You and me and us posters here, are tiny drop in the ocean of buyers of stuff..

I was there today..what a mess.
Still some athlete's foot cream I need was 40 percent less than the name brand. (Wall Mart Shit vs Wallgreen Shit)
...Same stuff....Saved 4 dollars. (one gallon of gas)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC