|
It's a class that has distinguished itself in some way. Some elitist groups will be good, and some will be bad. To assume they're all bad is to get hung up on the word. It reminds me of what a politician could do decades ago when the population wasn't as educated as it is today. He could stand up on a soapbox and claim his opponent's sister is a thespian and his opponent exhibits pedagogist behavior, and that alone would win him some votes.
So why are people now recoiling at the word, "elitist?" You know the Clintons were called elitist by the Republicans in the 90s. And when the Republicans came into power, they had no trouble passing themselves off as a superior, elite group that knew how to cut through the red tape to get things done, and of course, deserved rich rewards for their management accomplishments. They acted like bosshogs, which, by definition, are elitist. It means a socially superior group or a powerful minority group. That defines Bush's inner circle.
I understood what Obama was saying about small town America, because something has happened to small town America in the last fifteen to twenty years. Obama's observations are timely, yet his remarks are years ahead of their time. Someone had to say it to open a discussion in an area that many would prefer to be left alone because it helps maintain the status quo. However, no one could say it without receiving a backlash for it. Thus, "elitist" would do as good as any other criticism.
But when he said it, Obama showed his leadership in a way that no Clinton could. I don't think Bill would have said it if he thought the polls were not there to support the comment and they never will be. There is a lot of duplicity in this country, duplicity which most people will not look at and examine until they're forced to. If Obama wins the primary, he will open discussion in areas that will make many people feel uncomfortable at first. It will be like seeing the first interracial kiss on t.v. and that scares people. But if Obama is the candidate for change, it means that he will force this country to take a good, long, hard look at itself and that is timely because we are almost through the first decade of the 21st Century and we are already handicapped because the last president took the traditional, conservative approach to its fullest berth and the results have made us more stagnant than ever.
|