Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cindy's Recipe Gate - An intern gets the blame of course.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:17 AM
Original message
Cindy's Recipe Gate - An intern gets the blame of course.
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 06:19 AM by yellowcanine
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/cindys_recipegate.html

Cindy McCain's "Old McCain Family Recipes" turn out to be copied word for word from the Food Network. A lowly intern is blamed. Which raises the question of how a lowly intern was authorized to publish represent something as "McCain Family Recipes" all by his own little self? What would the Republican Gore Attack team (with the help of the MSM) have done with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Although, it is reminiscent of Kerry and Cookiegate
I think Family Circle asks the wife of both party's contenders (although would they have to ask Bill if Hillary wins?) for their favorite cookie recipe. Theresa Kerry's recipe was considered "weird" and not very mainstream - I think it had cranberries and cinnamon and seemed (gasp!)"European" while Laura's were the usual Mrs. Cleaver oatmeal or chocolate chip type thing.

The Kerry campaign blamed the cookie recipe on a staffer.

I think all these campaigns should be a little more with it now and realize that these "favorite recipe" things are little time bombs just waiting for them if they can't get their acts together and figure out what they really do like. And, it's probably better to prefer cheeseburgers to escargots. Don't scare America with "Frenchy" stuff!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "word for word" - hmmm - would that not be a copyright infringement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes but this is Rachal Ray of the Food Network......Not exactly Julia Child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. ok - wonder who she copied it from . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. that would depend on whether it's copyrighted material...
and if the use violated the terms of that copyright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. well - this was found on the Food Network site
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 08:04 AM by DrDan
". . . you may not use, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works based upon, publicly display, publicly perform, publish, transmit, or otherwise exploit Website Content for any purpose whatsoever without obtaining prior written consent from us . . . "

Seems to be an infringement to me - a lay person - unless the mccain intern sought and was granted permission for reproducing the recipe as a mccain-family recipe.

I think this is certainly more than trivial matter. It is a violation of the law, imo.

(editted to add link - http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/legal_information/ )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. you left out some key parts with your three dots- "..."
"Except as expressly permitted in these Terms of Use" . . . you may not use, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works based upon, publicly display, publicly perform, publish, transmit, or otherwise exploit Website Content for any purpose whatsoever without obtaining prior written consent from us . . . "

and the terms of use expressly permit "personal non-commercial use"...and while it could probably be argued that the office of potus has become just as "commercial" as anything else, i doubt that it is considered to be so from a legal standpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. well - lets add a bit more . . .
"Except as expressly permitted in these Terms of Use, you may not use, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works based upon, publicly display, publicly perform, publish, transmit, or otherwise exploit Website Content for any purpose whatsoever without obtaining prior written consent from us . . . "

************

"Furthermore, except as expressly permitted in these Terms of Use, you may not:

(i) remove, alter, cover, or distort any copyright, trademark, or other proprietary rights notice on the Website or Website Content"

************

so I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me the use of this recipe goes beyond "personal" use.

I do not mean this to be offensive in any way - I would just like to know the scope of your interpretation. Are you a lawyer? If so, then I certainly bow to your expertise. If not - do you have a legal background? If so, again, I bow to your background.

If not - then I assume we are both coming at this from a lay-person's background. And I absolutely do not mean this to be offensive or insulting in any way. I hope you do not take it to be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. how does it goe beyond personal use? was she selling them in a book of "mccain family recipes"?
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 09:30 AM by QuestionAll
i'm coming from a common-sense background, not a witch-hunt looking for nefariousness under every rock, behind every shadow, and around every corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. that was my first thought also - that this is such a trivial issue
but to capitalize on someone else's work and ownership - just to somehow improve the appeal of mccain just pisses me off.

I am somewhat angered that they would just "assume" ownership of something that belongs to someone else - just for their campaign. That seems very arrogant to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. it's certainly unethical, immoral and dishonest- but what about republicans isn't?
and yes it's maddening- i just don't think that it reaches any real magnitude of illegality...
ultimately, it probably hurts them worse in the court of public opinion than it would in any court of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe someone shoud post an "Old McCain Family Recipe" for "factory farm veal".
Sounds like a good project for the Onion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So, as a candidate's spouse,
did Bill Clinton provide a cookie recipe?

Maybe he can cook .... he's been on Rachel Ray's show a few times!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. he's been on her show a few times...i wonder if she's been on anything of his....?
:shrug:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Don't forget ... this came about because Hillary was *gasp* a working mom
in 1992, running against "Grandma" Babs in the "family values" era ... to show that Hillary was a bad mom, because she didn't have a chocolate chip cookie recipe ...

and then, in 1996, second wife Elizabeth Dole brushed it off, saying that she didn't have kids ... (how was that not terrible???)

and then, in 2000, with Tipper Gore supplying a chocolate chip cookie recipe, Pickles said that W didn't like chocolate chip cookies, so she did "ginger snaps" ... (gee, wasn't the whole idea of the "contest", or insult, the "better" chocolate chip cookie recipe?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. I doubt Cindy McCain has ever been in a kitchen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. that was my first thought when i heard about this.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought Cindy McCain would cook with
beer - after all she is a beer heiress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. "a lowly intern"....
Not to bring up the dead horse, but, was Monica ever considered "a lowly intern"??? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC