Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When the Dems increase the majority in the senate in Nov--Lieberman will go bye bye.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:35 AM
Original message
When the Dems increase the majority in the senate in Nov--Lieberman will go bye bye.
No committee seats, nothing. We won't need his sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. I very much look forward to seeing that happen - then they can kick his ass out in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More_liberal_than_mo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. 2012
I believe we're stuck with him in the Senate until 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Whoops! My mistake. Dam it. Can't be soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. He knows it, too. That's why he's so far up McCain's ass.
I think he's hoping he can visit the Senate as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Exactly so. He's known it since November of 06. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I'd love it if McLame picked Joe for VP
He was a lousy Veep candidate in 2000, and he'd be lousy in 2008! What a freakin' whiner he is!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. That possibility seems to be gaining in recent weeks
I've seen several stories discussing that probability.

Especially when the Dems win the White House (Veep is the tie breaker)

My guess is, LIEberman will retire from the Senate because he will be useless.
The pukes will have three US Senators from NE and no congress-critters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. If LIEberman leaves the Senate, he would be replaced by a Repub.
as the Governor (Jodi Rell-R) gets to make the selection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. True
But I don't imagine we'd end up much worse, honestly. So long as we have the numbers to keep the majority - and by a stronger margin, please - a moderate Republican would probably be better than Lieberman. Sad to say, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The funny thing, which I really had not thought about, is where would
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 05:59 PM by madinmaryland
Rell find a Republican in CT??

The only one of any stature (hahaha) is Chris Shays. He WOULD be worse than LIEberman.

I don't think Rowland is eligible since he is a convicted felon. How about Phil Giordano!!1!! :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. LOL Yeah, I think Rowland's got his cushy gig all set now
And Rell is eager to leave some daylight between herself and him.

I'm not sure Shays would be worse, honestly. We'd know what we're dealing with. And no one would have any illusions or be able to claim any pretense that he was a Democrat. And assuming we have a strong enough majority anyway, then Shays (who just might need a job then - let's hope he's out the door as CT's last GOP congressperson) would be an inconsequential member of the minority - distrusted by his own party as too "liberal" and seen, rightly, as a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, and not a second too soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. That will be a happy day
No longer having to kiss his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thank GOD. The fuckwipe Connecticit electorate can fuck the hell off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. He has already left the party
He'll just cease to caucus with us, that's all. Then, as an independent
who caucuses with the Republicans, he gets the choice of retaining his
moderately progressive social views, and will continue to vote with the
Democrats on them while irking his new right wing allies, or else he gets
to become trash in the eyes of those few remaining CT Democrats who voted
for him in 2006.

Either way, his relevance is reduced to next to nothing, and he either
retires for real, or gets retired de facto by having the world putting
him on ignore for the remainder of his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. I hope they make his ousting a public affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. A-men. Traitor Joe will get his just desserts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. If only that were true
Even though Reid may not need Lieberman next Congress to claim a Senate majority, he told Lieberman in private conversations that he would protect his seniority.

“I can tell you Sen. Reid had talked to me a few times and said he knows there will be talk if we get more than 51 Democrats next year,” Lieberman told The Hartford Courant this month. “As far as he is concerned, I will retain my seniority, et cetera, no matter how many Democrats there are next year.”

Jim Manley, a Reid spokesman, said he would not comment on the senator’s private conversations, but acknowledged that the two men spoke.

When asked Tuesday if Lieberman’s chairmanship was at risk next Congress, Reid said succinctly: “No.”

“We have one difference of opinion, maybe two with Sen. Lieberman,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a prominent supporter of Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) presidential candidacy. “As a whip, I can tell you time and again, he’s been there when we’ve needed him.”

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lieberman-willing-to-star-at-republican-convention-2008-04-15.html


The current bunch of useless idiots isn't about to be mean to their buddy Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC