Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Winning War On Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:49 AM
Original message
Bush Winning War On Congress
Bush winning war on Congress
By Clarence Lusane
The Progressive
April 10, 2008


If Bush was fearful initially that a Democratically controlled Congress would curtail his Iraq adventures, he quickly realized he needed only the pretense of accountability and then could continue on his merry way. Having agreed to an escalation branded “the surge” 19 months ago, Congress created a reporting mechanism that has become an exercise in spin.

The obligatory testimony to Congress every six months is not really about putting restraints on the administration or stopping the war. Democrats don’t have the spine for that, and Bush uses the occasion as a forum of disinformation to maintain the quagmire in Iraq.

Bush also uses the six-month ritual to set the stage for conflict with Iran. Petraeus told Congress Iran’s role was “particularly damaging,” “destructive,” “lethal,” and “nefarious.” Bush followed that up by threatening Iran. “The regime in Tehran also has a choice to make. It can live in peace with its neighbor,” Bush said on Thursday, or “America will act to protect our interests, and our troops and our partners.”

The real point of the recent testimony was to let legislators know that the administration was not going to honor the implicit bargain it made with Congress and the American people: that the surge was a temporary necessity and would result in fewer troops in Iraq. That deal is over and done with. Petraeus made clear that the drawdown would come to an end after July, and that at least 140,000 troops will still be in country well into 2009.


http://progressive.org/mp_darder041008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, when dems are heavily invested in businesses who do
goverment contracting, what opposition could there be? I mean, they would have to chose between their bank balance and what is right for the country. You fucking KNOW that bank balance is gonna win out every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. after six years, any congressperson who thought bu$h* would keep his word is a fool
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 09:00 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What Does that say about the voters
When the fools keep getting re-elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amihol Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. that is not the best...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hear, hear!
Among other things, it says those who vote for enablers are a big part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The voters are just beginning to learn how bad the situation is
and it is time to elect a new Congress- we need fresh perspectives
www.peacecandidates.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. It seems to me that it's not really a question of
Bush having won the war with Congress. He didn't actually win it; like everything else in his miserable life it was handed to him by a Congress that surrendered without a fight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC