|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:52 AM Original message |
Look what welfare and food stamps can buy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's not just welfare and food stamps. They have some profitable businesses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Western Precision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
85. These million-dollar contracts are not food stamp or welfare payments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. They have huge home building companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
120. And those boys should be going to school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. Like Al Capone, a little forensic accounting could be the solution to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. I was a welfare social worked in the 90's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
51. The state of Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
77. Lying to the authorities is a sacrament for these people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. not a black baby or cadillac in sight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well now where on earth would you get an idea to mention THAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. i was thinking more in terms of debunking welfare stereotypes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
86. oops. knew it was sarcasm, not sure where it lay.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mntleo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
134. More whites than blacks are on Welfare, it is a fact n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
80. ALERTING. Racist flamebait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #80 |
88. Why? It's what Ronald Reagan said when he started to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #88 |
102. It needed a sarcasm smilie, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. whew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Forgive me. I am too het up over all the polygamist abuse thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
97. Not so fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
6. Have you seen this? FLDS owned company was awarded $1.2 million in federal government contracts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Just posted that above and kicked that thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
8. Question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. JD that is a great point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. "An FLDS member will generally declare his first marriage and take the tax benefit". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. They only claim the first ( and only legal) marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. So if they become only "spritually" married to other wives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Texas is a common law marriage state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. in an exclusive relationship, Texas common law marriage only reconigezes it for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Of course they dont recognise more than one common law marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. The prosecutions that arise from what you are quoting are usually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Its the law and it can be prosecuted for *any* reason because they are breaking it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. A requirement of common law marriage is the declaration of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Not really they have these folks all over TV talking about their husbands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. They have not said they are in an exclusive, ongoing committed relationship as husband and wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Violations of welfare and child abuse laws sound like the most likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Umm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. Refusal to identify the father even though they live together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mntleo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #68 |
135. They are using these women for slaves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Almost... the couple still has to have a signed affidavit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. But it would be recognised as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. Are you referring to any specific TX statutes? If so, which one(s)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Your own post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. You appear to be leaving out a relevant portion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
103. is this simply your own interpretation of the state statutes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #103 |
118. MMmm, I live in Texas and all I know (anecdotal evidence) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
83. Well then, THAT'S a big "oops" for FLDS. They should have checked out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #17 |
37. Tax benefit for ONE wife, but "dependent" benefit for ALL the kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Sorry but youre really stretching it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
45. If Texas recognizes common law marriage, that may be the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. But in the case of prosecuting bigamy you dont need a signed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
70. Only one common law marriage at a time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. They're not legally married, but to them, civil marriage doesn't matter. It's the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. And If they recognize themselves as married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. They dont need that they have the women on camera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
50. I found the Texas Code. Please look at my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. No but living together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. declaration of informal marriage must be signed on a form prescribed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DadOf2LittleAngels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Nope read the law you posted more closely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. I'm afraid I'm missing the relevant "or" in subsection 2.402. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Whether they could even be considered married depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
82. FLDS is a cult that practices systematic child sexual abuse, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
10. Makes me wonder why the authorities don't crack down on these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I think you are all around the reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
90. So you are saying that authorities are willing to overlook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #90 |
107. Claim tax free status as a religion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
11. I keep thinking, "That is one butt-ugly temple." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Its kind of the same shape as a four poster bed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yeah, kinda freudian. Creepy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angela Shelley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
39. Hi NNNOLHI, that was a really funny comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. There's very little of shrubs and trees in that compound. I know it's a desert area...but why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
21. So...they're welfare queens, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Eeee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
28. There is no possible way the government didn't know what was going on there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. This story is horrific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InsultComicDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
33. Couldn't the two states involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftinOH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. The outbuildings look a bit like giant chicken coops.. which is essentially what they are; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
42. C'mon TEXAS... Crack down on welfare cheats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
59. that's exactly what I figured--"progressives" will now demand an end to food stamps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. VERY different... read the articles n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. How is it different? Racists have always thought they were right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. (If I may) I think that the above poster was saying that they should have to adhere to the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. "One mistake does not mean you throw the bath water out." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #74 |
131. The inevitable result of our predisposition to legislate and regulate based on the most extreme, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. very good examples. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KillCapitalism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. Food stamps should NOT be ended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Unfortunately, it's that "OVERSIGHT" that always ends up hurting those most in need! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KillCapitalism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. What CAN be done to prevent this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. There may be nothing. We can live with that. This is EXACTLY the same argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. 1 in 11 will soon be on Food Stamps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #78 |
94. Not if "Dems" join the RW and protest the use of food stamps! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. No it is not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #99 |
116. ohmy..... you have been jumping all over defending the right to punish these women and children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #94 |
104. I don't think anyone on this thread is calling for the absolute repeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #104 |
117. the very same argument that has been used time after time, and always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
128. I can't think of anyone who is MORE entitled to welfare and food stamps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #128 |
136. Some of these men are actually wealthy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushmeister0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
48. "Bleeding the beast." isn't that Grover Norquist's mantra? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
67. Close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushmeister0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #67 |
93. Starving the beast, drowning the baby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
75. Yes, this is the "perfect storm" for ending food stamps for ALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
53. Is that a Cadillac in the parking lot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
58. Now there will be a BIG backlash against welfare and food stamps. Are "progressives" ready to fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. Bobbie - this is a different situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #71 |
79. It's always "different". It was "different" when Clinton took away Wefare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #79 |
96. The reason you don't see the men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. You don't see a problem with cutting off children and women who are helpless?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #98 |
109. No, I don't. Not if they continue to live with these abusive men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. "Let 'em eat cake". Quite the liberated and "progressive" view point you've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-18-08 06:11 AM Response to Reply #112 |
137. I think what you are missing is that the the men do have money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
87. So who is going to buy that place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I can think of someone to IMMEDIATE occupy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. He can use it for his library, the one no one wants to help him build. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
92. WAIT A MINUTE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. "which group shall we pick next?" EXACTLY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Nobody is saying that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Yes, I am familiar with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #100 |
113. Actually, if you really read through 'em all, that is EXACTLY what they are saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #92 |
110. We MUST take away the government aid! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. You have all the RW talking points done quite well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Are you joking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. There's nothing more to be said to the conservative talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. So why did you call the women enablers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. And I fully support giving the women every bit of government help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. The women have no choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. They have a way out RIGHT NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #122 |
130. um, I think because the poster is using "cool" words the poster doesn't understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
106. Shut down the military industrial complex, then talk to me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #106 |
115. You're talking waaaaay too much sense! We must PUNISH these evildoers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
111. comments? do you see any relationship to this story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizfeelinggreat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
126. perhaps this has been said already but the MEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. I agree that they need to get the men out of there immediately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mntleo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-17-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
132. IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-18-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #132 |
138. Excellent informed post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-18-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #132 |
139. thanks for posting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC