Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What I dont get about the pope

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:05 AM
Original message
What I dont get about the pope
Here's a pic from a movie about Jesus giving a sermon to the masses.



Here's a pic of the pope giving a sermon to his masses.



"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
"Poor in spirit" means to be humble. Humility is the realization that all your gifts and blessings come from the grace of God. To have poverty of spirit means to be completely empty and open to the Word of God. When we are an empty cup and devoid of pride, we are humble. Humility brings an openness and an inner peace, allowing one to do the will of God.

Blessed are the meek,
for they shall inherit the earth

Does the pope look meek to you


Jesus said "Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven"

The pope hides child molesters from prosecution and allows them to abuse another day.


Please kep this from the religion dungeon, no one ever goes there and today is the conclusion of pope-apallooza
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're not the only one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. He doesn't wear that all the time... it's a special occasion and so
he is dressed up for these special occasions.

Don't you dress up for special occasions? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The Sermon on the Mount
Was a "special occasion".

I wonder how the Christ "dressed up" for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coriolis Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:26 AM
Original message
The amusing irony is - all dressed up and nowhere to go.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. He's been all over the last few days.
;)

He's in NYC now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coriolis Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Well, I actually meant like...in a few years.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Pope is actually a giant rabbit. How else do you explain the hat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. People have been raising these questions since the Reformation...
... and before that, actually.

No simple answer. My take: lots of people want to be ruled by a king. They like the pageantry, etc. Christianity... including (*especially*) it's central doctrines be damned.

Monarchy ( in the medieval sense) is kaput ... for a variety of complicated reasons. Yet many miss the trappings and ceremony. Ergo, the pope remains popular... esp. in areas of the world that are unfamiliar with the history of the church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Heh, Good point :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. The disconnect is stunning and sickening.
A few years ago I got into a rather nasty debate on another forum (not DU) about this very subject. People there were saying the such finery glorfies God and is therefore quite acceptable and appropriate.

I've never understood that since Christ preached and lived the total opposite.

I don't need the eccelastical equivalent of a Vegas floor show to feel reverence and awe at God's presence. In fact, some of the most spiritual times I've had have been in the exact opposite environments of what I've seen on TV.

But if the Pope wants to wear 500 yards of expensive linens and wear $500 Gucci shoes...well, it looks nice. I guess.

I'll be glad when he gets on the Popeplane and goes home. Getting tired of the nonstop coverage, getting tired of the "next best thing to God" references.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coriolis Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ratzo is truly one evil looking old Nazi bastard.
:scared: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe it's just me...but that's just not a kind looking face
Pope Bennie, that is



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coriolis Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That expression is on the wrong end of the exorcism.
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawgHouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. He's still pissed that he was passed over for the role of Palpatine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. ...and I thought I was the only one who thought of Palpatine
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 10:04 AM by notsodumbhillbilly
when I looked at the Pope's eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. Oh, snap. My husband said the exact same thing.
lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Roman Catholic Church is the wealthiest entity on the planet.
That gold & jewel encrusted miter he's wearing is encrusted with actual gold & jewels. His staff is made of pure silver. Ratzo hasn't done too bad for taking a vow of poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He doesn't 'own' any of that...
and I believe those things were donated to the church and to Vatican City
and have been in the possession of The Vatican City for centuries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Thats a distinction without a difference.
Bill Gates doesn't "own" his house either, but just try & take it away from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. You made it as if he did own it. He doesn't but
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 10:11 AM by Breeze54
he has chosen to use the more ornate clothing, more than other pope's
according to what I've read but I don't care what he wears, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. The Church owns it. The Pope is the absolute monarch of the Church. Therefore he owns it.
If he sold his hat, how many children could be fed for a year? A million? 5 million? 10? That's why it matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Wrong... the Church owns it...
He does not personally own it at all.

The Catholic Church has many charities to feed the poor.

Today, http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=290&srcid=193">Catholic Charities is recognized as one of the nation’s largest social service networks.
More than 240,000 compassionate volunteers, staff, and board members comprise the driving force
behind the Catholic Charities network that touches the lives of more than 7.8 million people of
all faiths a year.

Ninety cents of every dollar donated to Catholic Charities agencies goes directly to programs
and services, making the Catholic Charities network one of the most efficient in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Okay...
Then why doesn't he ask the church to sell it? I don't remember any spending or giving limits as set forth by the New Testament. There's nothing along the lines of "And when the multitudes had assembled, Jesus spake thusly: 'Giveth to some, then take a break and weareth thou a jewel-encrusted hat while other bellies bloat with starvation. Let them beg for food and mercy in the name of my Father, but do not help them, for a glimpse of your sterling silver crucifix-stick will feed their sprits.'"

I can't understand how people can use a story about ultimate self-sacrifice as justification for this kind of blatant, materialistic selfishness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Because the aggrandizement of the Holy Mother Church is more important than mere human welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. The Catholic Church donates more to charity than
many other entities including government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. But, again...
But when, according to Christ, would it be okay to be done?

When is it okay to stop and gild a hat, rather than feeding a hungry baby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Why should they sell it? maybe they'll think about it after the crystal Cathedral is sold!
The Crystal Cathedral is a Protestant Christian megachurch
in the city of Garden Grove, in Orange County, California.
www.crystalcathedral.org/visitors/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. So, Catholics (or the Catholic Church - ed. ) will act Christlike...
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 12:58 PM by urgk
Only if somebody else does it first?

That sounds like a thorough understanding of the scriptures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Huh?
The point is there is a lot of wealth among all the denominations.

I'm not a religious person. Are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. A lot of the stuff was borrowed or is part of the Vatican Treasury
The pope's clothing a nod to church history

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-080418-pope-fashion-photogallery,0,1203086.photogallery

The pope's clothing and its historic influence.


------------------------

Pope Benedict XVI wore a traditional white cassock with buttons down the
front and his trademark red shoes Wednesday during a visit to the White House.
(Getty photo by Win McNamee / April 16, 2008)



Pope Benedict XVI wore a gold mitre and heavily embroidered red chasuble
for mass in Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. His gold crozier, once carried
by Pope Leo XIII, was borrowed from the Vatican treasury.
(Getty/AFP photo by Mandel Ngan / April 17, 2008)


The trademark red shoes of Pope Benedict XVI are reportedly handmade by a cobbler
in northern Italy not Prada, as rumored. Pope Benedict revived the traditional papal
red shoes, which had not been worn since early in the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
(Getty/AFP photo by Tim Sloan / April 17, 2008)


While presiding over Vespers in the Crypt at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the
Immaculate Conception, Pope Benedict XVI wore a century-old gold cope from the treasury
of the National Shrine. It was worn by Bishop Thomas Joseph Shahan, the bishop who raised
funds for the shrine, on the day that church's foundation stone was laid in 1920.
(Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception
Photo by Matthew Barrick / April 16, 2008)


At a meeting with American bishops on Wednesdsay, Pope Benedict XVI wore a stole made of gold,
no fabric. The stole, which belonged to Pope Paul VI, is normally on display at the Basilica
of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. (Basilica of the National Shrine of the
Immaculate Conception photo by Matthew Barrick / April 16, 2008)




More pics at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. And the problem remains...
The Catholic Church has a treasury, full of gilded, materialistic things.

And babies still starve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. You don't understand what the term "absolute monarch" means, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I think you don't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. OK Peewee, here's the deal.
Christianity should be all about following the teachings of Christ: feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, clothing the naked, healing the sick. If the absolute monarch of the Catholic Church did that then charitable works would be its primary function.

The fact that it DOESN'T isn't an indication that the Pope CAN'T, that some unknown & unseen force within the Church actively prevents God's representative on earth from implementing His teachings & helping people. It is an indication that he sees the Churchs primary function to be something else - which is ACCUMULATING POWER & INFLUENCE. The immense wealth the Vatican displays is a byproduct of this, and why Bush (always the political animal)was required to go to the airport to get him like some minor acolyte.

The Pope wasn't given the Vatican treasury and the absolute power of the Church to fulfill Christ's teachings, he was put there to maintain & increase its wealth, power & influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Ok, Snotnose, here's the deal.
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 12:04 PM by Breeze54
You can try to rationalize and preach all about what the church should be doing but please include
ALL the denominations when doing so, as a comparison and BTW? The Catholic Church is one of the
top charities helping to feed the poor and help the poor in many ways. Of every dollar donated to
their charities, .90 cents goes to the charity. That's not to shabby. Have a great day; Snotnose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. What is the financial relationship between the Catholic Church & Catholic Charities?
Answer: There is none, other than Church appointees administer the funds donated by INDIVIDUALS and other groups not associated with the Church. Catholic Charities is an independent entity. None of the funds come from the Church, and when you make a donation to the Catholic Charities you are NOT donating to the Church.

The fact is the Church doesn't give anything the charity. None of the profits from its financial holdings, its properties around the world, or its other assets go toward charitable endeavors. All the "Catholic" schools, hospitals, and aide organizations have setups identical to the Catholic Charities: they are independent organizations where the money is donated from elsewhere and the Church is allowed to appoint the people in charge of that money. Other denominations don't play these legal semantic games.


and fyi "Peewee" is a specific reference, not just a random insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
54. And thanks to their stance on contraception, a nearly inexhaustible supply of poor to feed.
And convert along the way, of course.

Tesha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. It's also the oldest multinatonal corporation on earth
What a great con.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Yes and HORROR! They asked the choir to wear WHITE at the mass in DC!!!
Those bastids!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. This image is what really TORKS me: Pope as TOOL for Shrub!1
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//080416/photos_ts/2008_04_16t113636_450x337_us_pope_usa/


His defenders trot out "Pope was against the Iraq Attack" oh, & news items last week about his refusing to meet Condo and refusing to attend dinner with Shrub--


Yet, there he is sitting like painted puppets with Shrub. It DON'T MATTER that he was against the Iraq Attack, he IS LENDING his presence and his supposed "moral authority" to EVERYTHING SHRUB REPRESENTS just by being there.


CLUE: If Shrub is smiling, it AIN'T GOOD!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. That's silly.... he's a visiting dignatary also
and if your theory is correct, then

all dignitaries that visit also support all of *'s policies?

I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. What I said. But another way of saying what YOU said is:
1) Power-wielders/office-holders have a vested interest in legitimizing one another. If head-chopping happens to ONE, it might spread to OTHERS---viz., the other kings and the French Rev.

2) So if some dignitaries don't support all of anybody's policies, why do we demand that SOME dignitaries make a statement, such as against the Chinese at the Olympics? When DO we make a statement, when don't we do?!1


Now, in this situation, the pope has not been popular or "warm" so if he went off criticizing and disapproving, the masses of 'muricans would likely give him a big F-U!1 So there was something in it for him.

Would that da pope had discreetly delivered a big switch to Shrub IN PRIVATE, but why don't I believe he did? It would have been nice to hear Wolf say, after the private meeting, "A visibly shaken and somber pResident Shrub appears to have been ass-whipped by the pope, probably because of Iraq, although there is such a long list of Shrub offenses that it's hard to tell what for."


So le pope got a huge public relations deep tonguing.


Congrats to me for having responded without calling YOU "silly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I said your theory was silly, not you.
Get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. So I'm gripless?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Damn, Ratzo is even shorter than W
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Remember this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good lord, I wonder what the drag coefficient is on that Popemobile?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. Seems to me that John Paul II was much more into the humility thing than Ratzo is
and that's why, if you pay any attention to the pope at all (which I tend not to), he didn't seem so bad. True, I didn't agree with all his stances on issues, but that was hardly surprising given that he was Catholic and I am not. At least he was consistent--he was against both abortion AND the death penalty, for example. He believed both were examples of man taking away life that was only God's to take away. He didn't vilify abortion and glorify execution at the same time.

As for Ratzo, he kind of reminds me of why Lutherans such as the ones I spring from came to be. You know: because the Vatican became a symbol of wealth and riches and power exercised in a kingdom on earth, and, as the OP has pointed out, that was never what Jesus was about in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. I'm an American Catholic and I agree with your assessment.
There was a LOT that I disagreed with Pope John Paul II about, but I respected his convictions, his sincerity, and his absolute dedication to what he thought was right. I do not have the same respect for this Pope. Therein lies the reason people have issues with this pope that you didn't hear with JP II.

JP II lived what he preached. While he was risking his life in Poland for an education during WWII, this pope joined the Nazi youth group to facilitate his survival.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
33. The answer is:
Churches have absolutely nothing to do with God. Churches are entirely man-made institutions, even though they claim to be founded by God, they are man-made entities. I believe that God absolutely hates religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'm sure Jesus didn't teach his message that looked anything like this either.
It's the Mormon temple in Kensington, MD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. In the 80's, some wag spray painted "Surrender Dorothy" on that bridge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
51. It reminds me of the stories about the
Pharisees and Sadducees that Jesus railed about. Puts on a good show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
53. What I don't get
is how the Church is sorry for all the sex abuse yet Bishop Law goes on to become Cardinal Law. If they were sorry they wouldn't have been shifting the predators around and attacking victims that came forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC