Sunday School Teacher Accused Of Pasting Church Member Faces On Porn Images

[The Straight Story]

Sunday School Teacher Accused Of Pasting Church Member Faces On Porn Images
Sheriff's Office: 38-Year-Old Created Own Child Pornography

POLK COUNTY, Fla. -- A Sunday school teacher is accused of taking pictures of young church and youth group members and pasting their faces on sex images to create child pornography.

Police said Danny Parker, 38, who lives with his parents in Polk County, was arrested after a passerby found about 90 photos of young girls with missing faces in some trash at an egg farm located off of Highway 35-A in Dade City.

An investigation into the faceless photos led to Parker's parent's home in Kathleen.

During a search, police found a homemade photo album that Parker created containing images of young girls, between the ages of 5 and 15 years old, pasted on top of naked, pornographic and sexually explicit pictures of women's bodies, a Polk County Sheriff's news release said.

Parker admitted to purchasing adult pornographic magazines from Hillsborough and Pasco counties and altering the images to reflect child porn, the news release said.

http://www.local6.com/news/15931724/detail.html

[lpbk2713]

1. He is the egg man.

Koo koo kachoo.

:eyes:

[Orrex]

2. This was funny

Until I found out that it involved kids.

And WTF? Hasn't he heard of Photoshop? If you're going to be a freak, you might as well get technological about it.

[Adsos Letter]

4. He is also a Luddite...

[Jamastiene]

6. Most pervs have a higher than their usual

ability to learn highly technical skills if they are TRULY dedicated to their perviness. I give this guy an F- for sheer laziness. Damn, not only is the the kind of perv I don't like, but he showed no real creativity whatsoever.

Thanks for the Photoshop tip, btw. No wonder I've been having trouble attaching head shots of my favorite actresses to nekked pictures using only MSPaint, such a crappy little program. I wonder how much Photoshop costs nowadays?

[Jazzgirl]

10. $500-600 bucks.

[The Straight Story]

11. gimp is free

check it out - does pretty much everything PS does.

[KSinTX]

16. Maybe the charge will be Photo Manipulation Without a License?

[Clear Blue Sky]

3. Nice. Let's hear it for family values... n/t

[RedCappedBandit]

5. thats pretty messed up...

but is it actually a crime?

[Jamastiene]

8. The possession of the child porn to begin with was a crime.

His predatory actions using real children's pictures? Yeah, I'm pretty sure all of it together is still a crime.

[JDPriestly]

13. But, what set off the investigation? I do not believe that it was

the fact that someone found the pictures with the faces cut out. Kids make posters of their friends by cutting up photos of their friends. Just finding pictures with the faces cut out should not have set off a criminal investigation. There was probably some complaint beyond that. Someone was investigating the guy and checking his trash. Some parent probably became concerned about some behavior on his part that gave rise to suspicions about the guy's interests in children. The police would not want to "out" the parent. That would not be right. There is bound to be more to this story than just cutting out pictures and pasting them on pornography. This is really spooky.

[proud2BlibKansan]

15. But it says he had ADULT porn and put kids' faces on it

How is that child porn?

[Jamastiene]

22. In a lot of states, it is considered child porn to

do what he did.

[proud2BlibKansan]

25. That's messed up.

[RedCappedBandit]

17. Yeah, but there was no child porn to begin with

Very odd situation

[ZombieHorde]

9. That is a good question.

Should it be illegal, and if so, why?

[Bigmack]

7. "...38...lives with his parents..."

I'll bet he posts on the Freepsite.

This is icky even to me.... Sunday school teacher jerking off to pics of women with kid faces... eeeewww!

[Rosemary2205]

12. I don't understand how he broke a law.

Creepy as fucking hell, disturbed, and the guy clearly needs to stay away from kids, but the pics weren't "child porn" - as in getting kids to get nekkid and take pics in sexual positions or flat out raping kids and take pics. It will be interesting to see if he's convicted and what of.

If nothing else, the arrest gets his name and face splashed all over the news and makes it a hell of a lot harder to work in contact with children. A good thing. And hopefully will additionally scare the shit out of him so he doesn't move on to actually molesting kids (if he hasn't already).

[proud2BlibKansan]

14. Ok this is kind of creepy but what law did he break?

[varkam]

18. There are several people here wondering what law was broken...

Technically, this is child pornography even despite the fact that there is no child victim portrayed in the pictures. Federal statutes cover the act of "morphing", or taking a picture of a child and combining it with a pornographic image, as child pornography.

[Orrex]

19. I wondered about that, too

I couldn't recall whether that law still stood, but I'm glad to hear that it's in effect.

Does this cover full CGI child pornography, to your knowledge? That would be a sick loophole.

[varkam]

20. I don't believe it does.

Virtual child porn laws were struck down by the SCOTUS under First Ammendment concerns, I believe. As far as I know (and I'm by no means an expert in this area), computer-generated child pornography (i.e. not containing real people) is legal, though there could still be a prosecution for obscenity.

[Jamastiene]

21. I remember hearing a lot of discussion about that,

but I don't know if they ever resolved it. I'd be interested in knowing the answer to that too.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

23. No matter how totally YUCKY this is, I cannot see how he can be arrested for this.

Children did not pose naked or in sexual poses.

[LisaL]

24. But he took (allegedly) actual children's photos and used them in

making of pornographic images. I don't think that qualifies as "virtual porn."

[varkam]

26. As I note above, virtual porn is actually legal.

It's the act of "morphing" that makes it a crime.

[LisaL]

27. If he draw children's faces, it wouldn't be a crime.

But I think because he took actual photos of actual children, that's not legal.