Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Article OMITS The Fact That ANY "Covert" Program By Government To Shape News Is UNLAWFUL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:18 PM
Original message
NYT Article OMITS The Fact That ANY "Covert" Program By Government To Shape News Is UNLAWFUL
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 03:20 PM by kpete
The Pentagon’s Media Analyst Domestic Psy-Ops Program: Is It Legal?
By: bmaz Sunday April 20, 2008 12:52 pm

By now you have probably heard that the New York Times has an in-depth piece by David Barstow out for Sunday's edition on the use by the Pentagon of media "military experts" as propaganda conduits.

......................

The bottom line seems to be that any "covert" program by the government to shape the news, or disseminate false news, to the domestic American audience constitutes a violation of both the Appropriations Act prohibitions as well as the Anti-Deficiency Act. As further evidence of how sensitive the United States has historically been on prohibiting the governmental dissemination of domestic propaganda, keep in mind that the Smith-Mundt Act even prohibits the domestic dissemination of information utilized in foreign propaganda efforts of the US, which, of course, are legal (think Voice of America radio).

You would have to imagine that the first rationalization from Bushco will be along the lines of "well this is different than the Armstrong Williams situation because we didn't expend any money paying the military analysts and there was no quid pro quo". I would argue that the following snippets from today's NYT article put the lie to that likely defense:


Early one Friday morning, they put a group of retired military officers on one of the jets normally used by Vice President Dick Cheney and flew them to Cuba for a carefully orchestrated tour of Guantánamo.
...
In turn, members of this group have echoed administration talking points, sometimes even when they suspected the information was false or inflated. Some analysts acknowledge they suppressed doubts because they feared jeopardizing their access.

A few expressed regret for participating in what they regarded as an effort to dupe the American public with propaganda dressed as independent military analysis.
...
Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts as “message force multipliers” or “surrogates” who could be counted on to deliver administration “themes and messages” to millions of Americans “in the form of their own opinions.”
...
Conversely, the administration has demonstrated that there is a price for sustained criticism, many analysts said. “You’ll lose all access,” Dr. McCausland said.
...
Some of these analysts were on the mission to Cuba on June 24, 2005 — the first of six such Guantánamo trips — which was designed to mobilize analysts against the growing perception of Guantánamo as an international symbol of inhumane treatment.
...
It was, he said, “psyops on steroids” — a nuanced exercise in influence through flattery and proximity. “It’s not like it’s, ‘We’ll pay you $500 to get our story out,’ ” he said. “It’s more subtle.” The access came with a condition. Participants were instructed not to quote their briefers directly or otherwise describe their contacts with the Pentagon.
...
The memorandum led to a proposal to take analysts on a tour of Iraq in September 2003, timed to help overcome the sticker shock from Mr. Bush’s request for $87 billion in emergency war financing.
...
Some Pentagon officials said they were well aware that some analysts viewed their special access as a business advantage. “Of course we realized that,” Mr. Krueger said. “We weren’t naïve about that.”
...
Some e-mail messages between the Pentagon and the analysts reveal an implicit trade of privileged access for favorable coverage.
...
The Pentagon paid a private contractor, Omnitec Solutions, hundreds of thousands of dollars to scour databases for any trace of the analysts, be it a segment on “The O’Reilly Factor” or an interview with The Daily Inter Lake in Montana, circulation 20,000.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1208722405-n0YubxZfX3X5gh1TsZcYCw


Sure looks like there was a conscious quid pro quo, and that a lot of money and effort went into this program that was not formally appropriated, and therefore was in violation of both the Appropriations Act yearly provisions and the Anti-Deficiency Act provisions.

more at:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/04/20/the-pentagons-media-analyst-domestic-psy-ops-program-is-it-legal/#more-2051
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. The government told them to leave that part out, silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has The Corporate Media Said Boo About This Story Yet???
Did Timmeh or Streptacocus bring up this report this morning...or were they too obsessed with right wing spin and talking points?

Has there even been a report on CNN...one of the biggest abusers and copped out by saying their generals were to blame for not disclosing...even when it was blatant on how pro-war, pro-surge and pro-regime they were. One of the few Generals to speak out was Wesley Clark and you rarely see him on the cables these days...or any ex-military (and there are many) who dare to speak the truth about this regime's military madness.

I suspect the first network mention won't be until Olbermann tomorrow night. The crickets from the corporate media are deafening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Noone has brought it up because Cheney told them not to.
This whole thing doesn't pass the smell test (and boy does it stink).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. more crimes that will go unpunished
This administration is the most criminal in history, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Outside the USA too? They spent 100 million in Iraq on this, taking over all media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another one for the list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. we have a 'sorta' democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kicked and recommended
Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. thanks
for always being so supportive Uncle Joe
kp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's easy, you always seem to have so many top quality posts.
I'm out of here, have a good weekend.

:hi:

UJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Bush administration is inoculating Americans against
an aversion to its crimes. It has committed so many crimes so many times that we are all numbed. We cannot even feel the emotion of indignation any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's pretty much how it worked in Nazi Germany.
Adolph and Prescott would be so proud of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Numbed? I know that feeling.
uncomfortably numb.
outrage fatigue.
nothing is shocking anymore.

Damn. It's just got to end, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Media News & Hollywood has been under CIA control
CIA's Project Mockingbird, anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. more laws being broken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. we now have a ministry of propaganda....i'm so proud
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. This stinks of Rumsfeld. And Doug Feith. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC