Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The problem in Afghanistan just became a lot worse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:28 PM
Original message
The problem in Afghanistan just became a lot worse
Our good friends the Pakistanis are, again, not acting like good friends.

McClatchy reports:

"Pakistani authorities have resumed sending tens of thousands of Afghan refugees, many of whom have lived for decades in camps near the Afghanistan - Pakistan border, back to Afghanistan . . .

An estimated 2,000 Afghan refugees passed through the border checkpoint at Torkham on Sunday. They came in giant, open-top trucks, heavily laden with everything from doors, window frames and beds to piles of wooden beams and planks that will be used to construct homes in Afghanistan . . .

A Pakistani official at the camp, who declined to be identified because he wasn't authorized to speak to reporters, said that 1,043 families had left the camp as of Saturday. Some 10,000 families remain . . .

Pakistan plans to send all Afghan refugees back by the end of 2009. But the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees in Pakistan has warned that so speedy a resettlement program risks creating a humanitarian crisis, given the conflict in Afghanistan."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080421/wl_mcclatchy/2916396

The fly in the ointment here is that, apparently, the Afghan government demanded this to happen. They just didn't know the Pakistanis planned on sending all these refugees back to them.

NEWSWEEK reported last November:

"The Afghan refugee camps around Peshawar . . . have become vast jihadist sanctuaries. The Jalozai and Shamshatu camps, each housing some 100,000 Afghan refugees, date back to the war against the Soviets. Complaints from the Afghan government have forced Islamabad and the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees to begin the long process of emptying Jalozai, a job that's supposed to be completed by next spring . . . "

http://www.newsweek.com/id/57485/page/4

The Pakistanis aren't about to take all these people in as Pakistani citizens, eventhough most have been there for 20 years or so.

McClatchy again:

"You never know who comes and who goes in these camps,' said Mehmood Shah , a former top provincial interior ministry official. 'The government of Pakistan has decided that the Afghan mujaheddin must finally go back.'"

Oh, I think he has an idea;

NEWSWEEK:

"The Shamshatu camp, just south of Peshawar, is the personal fiefdom of the notorious Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. His guerrillas, the Hizb-i-Islami ("Party of Islam"), operate mainly in Afghanistan's Kunar province, but Shamshatu is their power base, in effect an autonomous enclave within Pakistan. Like Jalozai, the place resembles a sprawling, labyrinthine Afghan village of mud-brick houses surrounded by high mud walls, and it's ruled by strict, Taliban-style Islamic law. Music is forbidden—even musical ringtones on cell phones. So is tobacco. Women are banned from venturing outside except in the company of a male relative. (There are girls' schools, though: unlike his Taliban allies, Hekmatyar believes in women's education.)"

The Pakistanis are thinking they're going to get rid of their jihadias by sending them back to Afghanistan, where the ISAF is struggling already to contain a resurgent Taliban.

Here's the kicker, though:

"Shah said that the U.S. officials he'd discussed the issue with were uncertain whether closing the camps was a good idea.

'The U.S. was 50/50 on this issue,' Shah said."

Yeah, because who knows what would happen in Afghanistan if severval hundred thousand refugees suddenly showed up in Taliban hotbed territory with nothing but the clothes and windowpanes on their backs?

With elections coming up this year, you've got to figure this type of humanitarian disaster and Taliban recruiting boon would be a real plus for democracy in Afghanistan.

Shrug . . . That's the next administration's headache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh. Yet, thanks for the post. McClatchy news service does the best reporting on the ME
in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. McClatchy really is good.
Did you see their Baghdad bureau chief (I think that's what she was) on Bill Moyers Friday night? I thought she was outstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No missed her. I got hooked on McClatchy when they bought our local paper and
started running a few foreign correspondent reports. Now I read the web site pretty regularly. Real honest to goodness journalism, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Our paper is McClatchey too
It really is better than most newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. We get McClatchy articles in our newspaper, also.
I always believe their stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She was wonderful
One of his best interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I just loved her aura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The video and transcript are online for those who missed it.
I agree, she was very much a true journalist, seeking to tell the truths she discovered, despite the danger. By contrast, look at the sniveling ignoramuses who strut and posture and mouth, repeatedly and with great delight, the most banal trivia and petty gossip, while indulging themselves fully in all the luxurious comfort that their status as the official corporate media whores, pundits, commentators, analysts, spokesmodels or whatever they call themselves provide.

Video, transcript an more at this link: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04182008/profile.html
From the transcript:


BILL MOYERS: So do these fellows know who they're shooting at when they're shooting there at in Sadr City?

LEILA FADEL: I asked them, "Who are you fighting?" And he said, "Anybody that shoots at us." "I don't know about the politics. All I know is I'm shooting at the people that shoot at me." And there were--

BILL MOYERS: Who is this talking to you?

LEILA FADEL: This is the platoon leader

BILL MOYERS: How old is he?

LEILA FADEL: He is 23. He was a chemical officer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I've noticed a slight change in McClatchy in the last few months.
Can't quite put my finger on it. But, they're channeling BushCo more than I'd ever expect from them.

I read a lot because I post the Election Reform Daily thread and in general, read about an hour in the morning. McClatchy has been the best for years but lately, something sounds different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC