Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Bush preemptively pardon himself and his adminstration before he leaves office?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:03 AM
Original message
Poll question: Will Bush preemptively pardon himself and his adminstration before he leaves office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's that stupid and arrogant enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can he do that?
Or is he hoping John McCain wins so he can have him pardon everybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. well john has already said he does not find this administration
criminal. makes you want to do this :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. At least one thing about such a move would be interesting.
Accepting a pardon is tantamount to an admission of guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. He'll prolly try
not sure there is pardons for war crimes though. I know there are other countries who will no honor one if he did. bushco will be hunted down and dealt with like the war criminals they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Good point
I wonder if he put a pardon for war crimes into one of his signing statements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. which brings to mind reply # 5
which is how I see it too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. I can't answer, because I have no confidence that they'll even LEAVE.
People who've gone to such lengths to seize power illegally
don't generally hand it back voluntarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's been a recurring scenario in my nightmares for several weeks
It would be an interesting turn of events, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. That is also my nightmare scenario
I do not think it is unlikely either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpAgainstTheWall Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Of course!
People are salivating for a Bush war crimes trial. Of course he's going to pardon himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. i don't think you can pardon yourself (unless you burp or fart) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Most constitutional experts think a president CAN pardon himself
There is nothing in the clause that grants the power that would prohibit self pardoning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. In my opinion the Supreme Court should clarify this.
Well, a non-corrupt Supreme court. It seems to me the normal understanding is that someone can only be pardoned if they have been convicted of a crime. This "preemptive pardon" stuff started with Ford, and it should stop. The reasons for instituting the pardon in the Constitution are answered sufficiently by pardons that follow convictions. If you want a quick resolution, say in the aftermath of an actual "Jack Bauer" situation (and I think such a thing actually happening is remote at best), just confess guilt and get the pardon. This maintains an ability to avoid tragic punishment of such "heroics," while leaving a clear demarcation between what the law says and what it doesn't - in other words it maintains the rule of law which this "preemptive pardon" nonsense muddies up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. People will be severely shocked
at the breadth of the pardons when they're pardons. And nothing shocks anyone anymore. But this will. The list will number 250 and maybe up to 500. Maybe more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. No, but he wil pardon everyone else. And he will never be prosecuted.
Not by Obama. Not by Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. Just in general? Or for specific illegal acts?
The pardon them all "just in general" approach probably wouldn't work. The law doesn't like "just in general." On the other hand, it would be highly embarrassing and, frankly, impractical for him to list every single crime of every single one of his accomplices in his administration. That kind of admission of wrongdoing would be unique in the history of mankind. Outgoing leaders simply don't write themselves epitaphs that suggest that they surrounded themselves with criminals while in power, much less that they themselves were criminals. It doesn't read well in the history books. Further, Bush probably does not even admit to his dog that he and his accomplices did nothing but run a scam for the last seven years.

And there is one more thing: the Constitution gives the president to grant pardons except in cases of impeachment. But who would grant a pardon to Bush? Do you realize that if he pardons all his co-conspirators, then they can't plead the Fifth? Should he grant such a pardon, he alone would be left to face the accusations. No, I don't think Bush will pardon all of his partners in crime. Can you imagine the bestsellers they would write? It would create a sensation, and people would demand Bush's indictment. No. That would leave him the sole defendant should justice ever be sought.

I think Bush will figure that he doesn't need to pardon anyone. I think he will count on the fact that Americans have short memories, don't know or care about history, and that the next president will be more concerned about his or her legacy and consolidating his or her power than righting the wrongs of the Bush cronies. Isn't that why Bush's friends in the news media made sure that Edwards would not be running. He was the only one with the guts to go after wrongdoers. He was the only one with the knowledge of the law and skill to see to it that justice be served. He was the only one made enough to take the Bush scoundrels to court.

I haven't heard either Obama or Hillary talk about anything that would suggest they even realize that the Bush bunch are criminals. Besides, by just sitting and voting in the Senate, Hillary and Obama are to some extent co-conspirators themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsdsharp Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The pardons don't need to specify crimes.
Here is the operative language of Ford's pardon of Nixon:

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9,1974.

That's about as general as it can get. I am virtually certain that Bush will issue similar pardons to much of his administration. It would not surprise me if he resigns on the morning of January 20th, and Cheney then pardons him, just to get around the question of whether he can pardon himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. Voted for number 1, but ...
Hoping for number 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Is the pope Catholic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's possible he's so stupid
He'll forget to sign the pardons. Either way he'll pardon himself from Dallas long after he's president. Hey he WAS president that means he can still pardon in Republican world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC